Cargando…
Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain
BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain (LBP), there continues to be wide variation in general practitioners' (GPs') referral rates for lumbar spine x-ray (LSX). This study aims to explain variation in GPs' referral rates for LSX...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16884536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-15 |
_version_ | 1782130271810748416 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Rachel Lecouturier, Jan Bond, Senga |
author_facet | Baker, Rachel Lecouturier, Jan Bond, Senga |
author_sort | Baker, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain (LBP), there continues to be wide variation in general practitioners' (GPs') referral rates for lumbar spine x-ray (LSX). This study aims to explain variation in GPs' referral rates for LSX from their accounts of the management of patients with low back pain. METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 29 GPs with high and low referral rates for LSX in North East England. Thematic analysis used constant comparative techniques. RESULTS: Common and divergent themes were identified among high- and low-users of LSX. Themes that were similar in both groups included an awareness of current guidelines for the use of LSX for patients with LBP and the pressure from patients and institutional factors to order a LSX. Differentiating themes for the high-user group included: a belief that LSX provides reassurance to patients that can outweigh risks, pessimism about the management options for LBP, and a belief that denying LSX would adversely affect doctor-patient relationships. Two specific differentiating themes are considered in more depth: GPs' awareness of their use of lumbar spine radiology relative to others, and the perceived risks associated with LSX radiation. CONCLUSION: Several key factors differentiate the accounts of GPs who have high and low rates of referral for LSX, even though they are aware of clinical guideline recommendations. Intervention studies that aim to increase adherence to guideline recommendations on the use of LSX by changing the ordering behaviour of practitioners in primary care should focus on these factors. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1570475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15704752006-09-21 Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain Baker, Rachel Lecouturier, Jan Bond, Senga Implement Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain (LBP), there continues to be wide variation in general practitioners' (GPs') referral rates for lumbar spine x-ray (LSX). This study aims to explain variation in GPs' referral rates for LSX from their accounts of the management of patients with low back pain. METHODS: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 29 GPs with high and low referral rates for LSX in North East England. Thematic analysis used constant comparative techniques. RESULTS: Common and divergent themes were identified among high- and low-users of LSX. Themes that were similar in both groups included an awareness of current guidelines for the use of LSX for patients with LBP and the pressure from patients and institutional factors to order a LSX. Differentiating themes for the high-user group included: a belief that LSX provides reassurance to patients that can outweigh risks, pessimism about the management options for LBP, and a belief that denying LSX would adversely affect doctor-patient relationships. Two specific differentiating themes are considered in more depth: GPs' awareness of their use of lumbar spine radiology relative to others, and the perceived risks associated with LSX radiation. CONCLUSION: Several key factors differentiate the accounts of GPs who have high and low rates of referral for LSX, even though they are aware of clinical guideline recommendations. Intervention studies that aim to increase adherence to guideline recommendations on the use of LSX by changing the ordering behaviour of practitioners in primary care should focus on these factors. BioMed Central 2006-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1570475/ /pubmed/16884536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-15 Text en Copyright © 2006 Baker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baker, Rachel Lecouturier, Jan Bond, Senga Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
title | Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
title_full | Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
title_fullStr | Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
title_short | Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
title_sort | explaining variation in gp referral rates for x-rays for back pain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16884536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakerrachel explainingvariationingpreferralratesforxraysforbackpain AT lecouturierjan explainingvariationingpreferralratesforxraysforbackpain AT bondsenga explainingvariationingpreferralratesforxraysforbackpain |