Cargando…

A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas

PURPOSE: As a foundation for a dose escalation trial, we sought to characterize duodenal and non-duodenal small bowel organ motion between fractions of pancreatic radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (4 women, 5 men) undergoing radiation therapy were enrolled in this prospective st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Anurag K, Tierney, Ryan M, Low, Daniel A, Parikh, Parag J, Myerson, Robert J, Deasy, Joseph O, Wu, Catherine S, Pereira, Gisele C, Wahab, Sasha H, Mutic MS, Sasa, Grigsby, Perry W, Hope, Andrew J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16952315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-33
_version_ 1782130286805385216
author Singh, Anurag K
Tierney, Ryan M
Low, Daniel A
Parikh, Parag J
Myerson, Robert J
Deasy, Joseph O
Wu, Catherine S
Pereira, Gisele C
Wahab, Sasha H
Mutic MS, Sasa
Grigsby, Perry W
Hope, Andrew J
author_facet Singh, Anurag K
Tierney, Ryan M
Low, Daniel A
Parikh, Parag J
Myerson, Robert J
Deasy, Joseph O
Wu, Catherine S
Pereira, Gisele C
Wahab, Sasha H
Mutic MS, Sasa
Grigsby, Perry W
Hope, Andrew J
author_sort Singh, Anurag K
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: As a foundation for a dose escalation trial, we sought to characterize duodenal and non-duodenal small bowel organ motion between fractions of pancreatic radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (4 women, 5 men) undergoing radiation therapy were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients had up to four weekly CT scans performed during their course of radiation therapy. Pancreas, duodenum and non-duodenal small bowel were then contoured for each CT scan. On the initial scan, a four-field plan was generated to fully cover the pancreas. This plan was registered to each subsequent CT scan. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analyses were performed for the duodenum, non-duodenal small bowel, large bowel, and pancreas. RESULTS: With significant individual variation, the volume of duodenum receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose was consistently greater than the remaining small bowel. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of non-duodenal small bowel irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 1% to 20%. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of duodenum irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 30% to 100%. CONCLUSION: The volume of small bowel irradiated during four-field pancreatic radiation therapy changes substantially between fractions. This suggests dose escalation may be possible. However, dose limits to the duodenum should be stricter than for other segments of small bowel.
format Text
id pubmed-1574326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15743262006-09-23 A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas Singh, Anurag K Tierney, Ryan M Low, Daniel A Parikh, Parag J Myerson, Robert J Deasy, Joseph O Wu, Catherine S Pereira, Gisele C Wahab, Sasha H Mutic MS, Sasa Grigsby, Perry W Hope, Andrew J Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: As a foundation for a dose escalation trial, we sought to characterize duodenal and non-duodenal small bowel organ motion between fractions of pancreatic radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (4 women, 5 men) undergoing radiation therapy were enrolled in this prospective study. The patients had up to four weekly CT scans performed during their course of radiation therapy. Pancreas, duodenum and non-duodenal small bowel were then contoured for each CT scan. On the initial scan, a four-field plan was generated to fully cover the pancreas. This plan was registered to each subsequent CT scan. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analyses were performed for the duodenum, non-duodenal small bowel, large bowel, and pancreas. RESULTS: With significant individual variation, the volume of duodenum receiving at least 80% of the prescribed dose was consistently greater than the remaining small bowel. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of non-duodenal small bowel irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 1% to 20%. In the patient with the largest inter-fraction variation, the fractional volume of duodenum irradiated to at least the 80% isodose line ranged from 30% to 100%. CONCLUSION: The volume of small bowel irradiated during four-field pancreatic radiation therapy changes substantially between fractions. This suggests dose escalation may be possible. However, dose limits to the duodenum should be stricter than for other segments of small bowel. BioMed Central 2006-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1574326/ /pubmed/16952315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-33 Text en Copyright © 2006 Singh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Singh, Anurag K
Tierney, Ryan M
Low, Daniel A
Parikh, Parag J
Myerson, Robert J
Deasy, Joseph O
Wu, Catherine S
Pereira, Gisele C
Wahab, Sasha H
Mutic MS, Sasa
Grigsby, Perry W
Hope, Andrew J
A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_full A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_fullStr A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_short A prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: Implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
title_sort prospective study of differences in duodenum compared to remaining small bowel motion between radiation treatments: implications for radiation dose escalation in carcinoma of the pancreas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16952315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-33
work_keys_str_mv AT singhanuragk aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT tierneyryanm aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT lowdaniela aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT parikhparagj aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT myersonrobertj aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT deasyjosepho aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wucatherines aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT pereiragiselec aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wahabsashah aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT muticmssasa aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT grigsbyperryw aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT hopeandrewj aprospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT singhanuragk prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT tierneyryanm prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT lowdaniela prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT parikhparagj prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT myersonrobertj prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT deasyjosepho prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wucatherines prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT pereiragiselec prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT wahabsashah prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT muticmssasa prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT grigsbyperryw prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas
AT hopeandrewj prospectivestudyofdifferencesinduodenumcomparedtoremainingsmallbowelmotionbetweenradiationtreatmentsimplicationsforradiationdoseescalationincarcinomaofthepancreas