Cargando…
UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study
BACKGROUND: Home ultraviolet B (UVB) treatment is a much-debated treatment, especially with regard to effectiveness, safety and side effects. However, it is increasingly being prescribed, especially in the Netherlands. Despite ongoing discussions, no randomised research has been performed, and only...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-39 |
_version_ | 1782130289235984384 |
---|---|
author | Koek, Mayke BG Buskens, Erik Steegmans, Paul HA van Weelden, Huib Bruijnzeel-Koomen, Carla AFM Sigurdsson, Vigfús |
author_facet | Koek, Mayke BG Buskens, Erik Steegmans, Paul HA van Weelden, Huib Bruijnzeel-Koomen, Carla AFM Sigurdsson, Vigfús |
author_sort | Koek, Mayke BG |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Home ultraviolet B (UVB) treatment is a much-debated treatment, especially with regard to effectiveness, safety and side effects. However, it is increasingly being prescribed, especially in the Netherlands. Despite ongoing discussions, no randomised research has been performed, and only two studies actually compare two groups of patients. Thus, firm evidence to support or discourage the use of home UVB phototherapy has not yet been obtained. This is the goal of the present study, the PLUTO study (Dutch acronym for "national trial on home UVB phototherapy for psoriasis"). METHODS: We designed a pragmatic randomised single-blind multi-centre trial. This trial is designed to evaluate the impact of home UVB treatment versus UVB phototherapy in a hospital outpatient clinic as to effectiveness, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. In total 196 patients with psoriasis who were clinically eligible for UVB phototherapy were included. Normally 85% of the patients treated with UVB show a relevant clinical response. With a power of 80% and a 0.05 significance level it will be possible to detect a reduction in effectiveness of 15%. Effectiveness will be determined by calculating differences in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Self Administered PASI (SAPASI) scores. Quality of life is measured using several validated generic questionnaires and a disease-specific questionnaire. Other outcome measures include costs, side effects, dosimetry, concomitant use of medication and patient satisfaction. Patients are followed throughout the therapy and for 12 months thereafter. The study is no longer recruiting patients, and is expected to report in 2006. DISCUSSION: In the field of home UVB phototherapy this trial is the first randomised parallel group study. As such, this trial addresses the weaknesses encountered in previous studies. The pragmatic design ensures that the results can be well generalised to the target population. Because, in addition to effectiveness, aspects such as quality of life and cost-effectiveness are also taken into consideration, this study will produce valuable evidence to either support or discourage prescription of home UVB phototherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials/Nederlands Trial register: ISRCTN83025173. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00150930 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1574336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15743362006-09-25 UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study Koek, Mayke BG Buskens, Erik Steegmans, Paul HA van Weelden, Huib Bruijnzeel-Koomen, Carla AFM Sigurdsson, Vigfús BMC Med Res Methodol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Home ultraviolet B (UVB) treatment is a much-debated treatment, especially with regard to effectiveness, safety and side effects. However, it is increasingly being prescribed, especially in the Netherlands. Despite ongoing discussions, no randomised research has been performed, and only two studies actually compare two groups of patients. Thus, firm evidence to support or discourage the use of home UVB phototherapy has not yet been obtained. This is the goal of the present study, the PLUTO study (Dutch acronym for "national trial on home UVB phototherapy for psoriasis"). METHODS: We designed a pragmatic randomised single-blind multi-centre trial. This trial is designed to evaluate the impact of home UVB treatment versus UVB phototherapy in a hospital outpatient clinic as to effectiveness, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. In total 196 patients with psoriasis who were clinically eligible for UVB phototherapy were included. Normally 85% of the patients treated with UVB show a relevant clinical response. With a power of 80% and a 0.05 significance level it will be possible to detect a reduction in effectiveness of 15%. Effectiveness will be determined by calculating differences in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Self Administered PASI (SAPASI) scores. Quality of life is measured using several validated generic questionnaires and a disease-specific questionnaire. Other outcome measures include costs, side effects, dosimetry, concomitant use of medication and patient satisfaction. Patients are followed throughout the therapy and for 12 months thereafter. The study is no longer recruiting patients, and is expected to report in 2006. DISCUSSION: In the field of home UVB phototherapy this trial is the first randomised parallel group study. As such, this trial addresses the weaknesses encountered in previous studies. The pragmatic design ensures that the results can be well generalised to the target population. Because, in addition to effectiveness, aspects such as quality of life and cost-effectiveness are also taken into consideration, this study will produce valuable evidence to either support or discourage prescription of home UVB phototherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials/Nederlands Trial register: ISRCTN83025173. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00150930 BioMed Central 2006-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1574336/ /pubmed/16882343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-39 Text en Copyright © 2006 Koek et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Koek, Mayke BG Buskens, Erik Steegmans, Paul HA van Weelden, Huib Bruijnzeel-Koomen, Carla AFM Sigurdsson, Vigfús UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study |
title | UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study |
title_full | UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study |
title_fullStr | UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study |
title_full_unstemmed | UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study |
title_short | UVB phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. The PLUTO study |
title_sort | uvb phototherapy in an outpatient setting or at home: a pragmatic randomised single-blind trial designed to settle the discussion. the pluto study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1574336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koekmaykebg uvbphototherapyinanoutpatientsettingorathomeapragmaticrandomisedsingleblindtrialdesignedtosettlethediscussiontheplutostudy AT buskenserik uvbphototherapyinanoutpatientsettingorathomeapragmaticrandomisedsingleblindtrialdesignedtosettlethediscussiontheplutostudy AT steegmanspaulha uvbphototherapyinanoutpatientsettingorathomeapragmaticrandomisedsingleblindtrialdesignedtosettlethediscussiontheplutostudy AT vanweeldenhuib uvbphototherapyinanoutpatientsettingorathomeapragmaticrandomisedsingleblindtrialdesignedtosettlethediscussiontheplutostudy AT bruijnzeelkoomencarlaafm uvbphototherapyinanoutpatientsettingorathomeapragmaticrandomisedsingleblindtrialdesignedtosettlethediscussiontheplutostudy AT sigurdssonvigfus uvbphototherapyinanoutpatientsettingorathomeapragmaticrandomisedsingleblindtrialdesignedtosettlethediscussiontheplutostudy |