Cargando…

MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an alternative to diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for investigating biliary obstruction. The use of MRCP, a non-invasive procedure, may prevent the use of unnecessary invasive procedures. The aim of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaltenthaler, Eva C, Walters, Stephen J, Chilcott, Jim, Blakeborough, Anthony, Vergel, Yolanda Bravo, Thomas, Steven
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1579209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16907974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-6-9
_version_ 1782130310638469120
author Kaltenthaler, Eva C
Walters, Stephen J
Chilcott, Jim
Blakeborough, Anthony
Vergel, Yolanda Bravo
Thomas, Steven
author_facet Kaltenthaler, Eva C
Walters, Stephen J
Chilcott, Jim
Blakeborough, Anthony
Vergel, Yolanda Bravo
Thomas, Steven
author_sort Kaltenthaler, Eva C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an alternative to diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for investigating biliary obstruction. The use of MRCP, a non-invasive procedure, may prevent the use of unnecessary invasive procedures. The aim of the study was to compare the findings of MRCP with those of ERCP by the computation of accuracy statistics. METHODS: Thirteen electronic bibliographic databases, covering biomedical, science, health economics and grey literature were searched. A systematic review of studies comparing MRCP to diagnostic ERCP in patients with suspected biliary obstruction was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, acceptability and adverse events were reported. RESULTS: 25 studies were identified reporting several conditions including choledocholithiasis (18 studies), malignancy (four studies), obstruction (three studies), stricture (two studies) and dilatation (five studies). Three of the 18 studies reporting choledocholithiasis were excluded from the analysis due to lack of data, or differences in study design. The sensitivity for the 15 studies of choledocholithiasis ranged from 0.50 to 1.00 while specificity ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The positive likelihood ratio ranged: from 5.44–47.72 and the negative likelihood ratio for the 15 studies ranged from 0.00–0.51. Significant heterogeneity was found across the 15 studies so the sensitivities and specificities were summarised by a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. For malignancy, sensitivity ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 and specificity from 0.92 to 1.00. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 10.12 to 43 and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.15 to 0.21, although these estimates were less reliable. CONCLUSION: MRCP is a comparable diagnostic investigation in comparison to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction.
format Text
id pubmed-1579209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15792092006-09-28 MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review Kaltenthaler, Eva C Walters, Stephen J Chilcott, Jim Blakeborough, Anthony Vergel, Yolanda Bravo Thomas, Steven BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an alternative to diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for investigating biliary obstruction. The use of MRCP, a non-invasive procedure, may prevent the use of unnecessary invasive procedures. The aim of the study was to compare the findings of MRCP with those of ERCP by the computation of accuracy statistics. METHODS: Thirteen electronic bibliographic databases, covering biomedical, science, health economics and grey literature were searched. A systematic review of studies comparing MRCP to diagnostic ERCP in patients with suspected biliary obstruction was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, acceptability and adverse events were reported. RESULTS: 25 studies were identified reporting several conditions including choledocholithiasis (18 studies), malignancy (four studies), obstruction (three studies), stricture (two studies) and dilatation (five studies). Three of the 18 studies reporting choledocholithiasis were excluded from the analysis due to lack of data, or differences in study design. The sensitivity for the 15 studies of choledocholithiasis ranged from 0.50 to 1.00 while specificity ranged from 0.83 to 1.00. The positive likelihood ratio ranged: from 5.44–47.72 and the negative likelihood ratio for the 15 studies ranged from 0.00–0.51. Significant heterogeneity was found across the 15 studies so the sensitivities and specificities were summarised by a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. For malignancy, sensitivity ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 and specificity from 0.92 to 1.00. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 10.12 to 43 and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.15 to 0.21, although these estimates were less reliable. CONCLUSION: MRCP is a comparable diagnostic investigation in comparison to ERCP for diagnosing biliary obstruction. BioMed Central 2006-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC1579209/ /pubmed/16907974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-6-9 Text en Copyright © 2006 Kaltenthaler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaltenthaler, Eva C
Walters, Stephen J
Chilcott, Jim
Blakeborough, Anthony
Vergel, Yolanda Bravo
Thomas, Steven
MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
title MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
title_full MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
title_fullStr MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
title_short MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
title_sort mrcp compared to diagnostic ercp for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1579209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16907974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-6-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kaltenthalerevac mrcpcomparedtodiagnosticercpfordiagnosiswhenbiliaryobstructionissuspectedasystematicreview
AT waltersstephenj mrcpcomparedtodiagnosticercpfordiagnosiswhenbiliaryobstructionissuspectedasystematicreview
AT chilcottjim mrcpcomparedtodiagnosticercpfordiagnosiswhenbiliaryobstructionissuspectedasystematicreview
AT blakeboroughanthony mrcpcomparedtodiagnosticercpfordiagnosiswhenbiliaryobstructionissuspectedasystematicreview
AT vergelyolandabravo mrcpcomparedtodiagnosticercpfordiagnosiswhenbiliaryobstructionissuspectedasystematicreview
AT thomassteven mrcpcomparedtodiagnosticercpfordiagnosiswhenbiliaryobstructionissuspectedasystematicreview