Cargando…

Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the hypothesis that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor use might have counteracted a beneficial effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and account for the absence of cardioprotection in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Estrogen increases COX expression, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsia, Judith, Manson, JoAnn E, Kuller, Lewis, Pettinger, Mary, Choe, John H, Langer, Robert D, Limacher, Marian, Oberman, Albert, Ockene, Judith, O'Sullivan, Mary Jo, Robinson, Jennifer G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1584256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17016543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010026
_version_ 1782130332500230144
author Hsia, Judith
Manson, JoAnn E
Kuller, Lewis
Pettinger, Mary
Choe, John H
Langer, Robert D
Limacher, Marian
Oberman, Albert
Ockene, Judith
O'Sullivan, Mary Jo
Robinson, Jennifer G
author_facet Hsia, Judith
Manson, JoAnn E
Kuller, Lewis
Pettinger, Mary
Choe, John H
Langer, Robert D
Limacher, Marian
Oberman, Albert
Ockene, Judith
O'Sullivan, Mary Jo
Robinson, Jennifer G
author_sort Hsia, Judith
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the hypothesis that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor use might have counteracted a beneficial effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and account for the absence of cardioprotection in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Estrogen increases COX expression, and inhibitors of COX such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents appear to increase coronary risk, raising the possibility of a clinically important interaction in the trials. DESIGN: The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was assessed at baseline and at years 1, 3, and 6. SETTING: The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials were conducted at 40 clinical sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50–79 y. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or to placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo. OUTCOME MEASURES: Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and coronary revascularization were ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial. RESULTS: Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated from Cox proportional hazard models stratified by COX inhibitor use. The hazard ratio for myocardial infarction/coronary death with estrogen plus progestin was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.68–1.89) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.35 (95% confidence interval 0.86–2.10) among continuous users. The hazard ratio with estrogen alone was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.57–1.48) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.69–1.70) among continuous users. In a second analytic approach, hazard ratios were calculated from Cox models that included hormone trial assignment as well as a time-dependent covariate for medication use, and an interaction term. No significant interaction was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Use of COX inhibitors did not significantly affect the Women's Health Initiative hormone trial results.
format Text
id pubmed-1584256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15842562007-04-12 Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial Hsia, Judith Manson, JoAnn E Kuller, Lewis Pettinger, Mary Choe, John H Langer, Robert D Limacher, Marian Oberman, Albert Ockene, Judith O'Sullivan, Mary Jo Robinson, Jennifer G PLoS Clin Trials Research Article OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the hypothesis that cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor use might have counteracted a beneficial effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy, and account for the absence of cardioprotection in the Women's Health Initiative hormone trials. Estrogen increases COX expression, and inhibitors of COX such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents appear to increase coronary risk, raising the possibility of a clinically important interaction in the trials. DESIGN: The hormone trials were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was assessed at baseline and at years 1, 3, and 6. SETTING: The Women's Health Initiative hormone trials were conducted at 40 clinical sites in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: The trials enrolled 27,347 postmenopausal women, aged 50–79 y. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized 16,608 women with intact uterus to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg daily or to placebo, and 10,739 women with prior hysterectomy to conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg daily or placebo. OUTCOME MEASURES: Myocardial infarction, coronary death, and coronary revascularization were ascertained during 5.6 y of follow-up in the estrogen plus progestin trial and 6.8 y of follow-up in the estrogen alone trial. RESULTS: Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated from Cox proportional hazard models stratified by COX inhibitor use. The hazard ratio for myocardial infarction/coronary death with estrogen plus progestin was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.68–1.89) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.35 (95% confidence interval 0.86–2.10) among continuous users. The hazard ratio with estrogen alone was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.57–1.48) among non-users of COX inhibitors, and 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.69–1.70) among continuous users. In a second analytic approach, hazard ratios were calculated from Cox models that included hormone trial assignment as well as a time-dependent covariate for medication use, and an interaction term. No significant interaction was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Use of COX inhibitors did not significantly affect the Women's Health Initiative hormone trial results. Public Library of Science 2006-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1584256/ /pubmed/17016543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010026 Text en © 2006 Hsia et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hsia, Judith
Manson, JoAnn E
Kuller, Lewis
Pettinger, Mary
Choe, John H
Langer, Robert D
Limacher, Marian
Oberman, Albert
Ockene, Judith
O'Sullivan, Mary Jo
Robinson, Jennifer G
Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
title Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
title_full Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
title_short Impact of Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trials: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial
title_sort impact of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the women's health initiative hormone trials: secondary analysis of a randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1584256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17016543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0010026
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiajudith impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT mansonjoanne impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT kullerlewis impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT pettingermary impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT choejohnh impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT langerrobertd impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT limachermarian impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT obermanalbert impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT ockenejudith impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT osullivanmaryjo impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT robinsonjenniferg impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial
AT impactofcyclooxygenaseinhibitorsinthewomenshealthinitiativehormonetrialssecondaryanalysisofarandomizedtrial