Cargando…
Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and perfo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16995937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-65 |
_version_ | 1782130357843263488 |
---|---|
author | Atkinson, Mark J Lennox, Richard D |
author_facet | Atkinson, Mark J Lennox, Richard D |
author_sort | Atkinson, Mark J |
collection | PubMed |
description | A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1590011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15900112006-10-05 Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes Atkinson, Mark J Lennox, Richard D Health Qual Life Outcomes Commentary A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities. BioMed Central 2006-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1590011/ /pubmed/16995937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-65 Text en Copyright © 2006 Atkinson and Lennox; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Atkinson, Mark J Lennox, Richard D Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes |
title | Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes |
title_full | Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes |
title_short | Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes |
title_sort | extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of patient reported outcomes |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16995937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atkinsonmarkj extendingbasicprinciplesofmeasurementmodelstothedesignandvalidationofpatientreportedoutcomes AT lennoxrichardd extendingbasicprinciplesofmeasurementmodelstothedesignandvalidationofpatientreportedoutcomes |