Cargando…

Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes

A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atkinson, Mark J, Lennox, Richard D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16995937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-65
_version_ 1782130357843263488
author Atkinson, Mark J
Lennox, Richard D
author_facet Atkinson, Mark J
Lennox, Richard D
author_sort Atkinson, Mark J
collection PubMed
description A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities.
format Text
id pubmed-1590011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15900112006-10-05 Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes Atkinson, Mark J Lennox, Richard D Health Qual Life Outcomes Commentary A recently published article by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust presents guidelines for selecting and evaluating health status and health-related quality of life measures used in health outcomes research. In their article, they propose a number of validation and performance criteria with which to evaluate such self-report measures. We provide an alternate, yet complementary, perspective by extending the types of measurement models which are available to the instrument designer. During psychometric development or selection of a Patient Reported Outcome measure it is necessary to determine which, of the five types of measurement models, the measure is based on; 1) a Multiple Effect Indicator model, 2) a Multiple Cause Indicator model, 3) a Single Item Effect Indicator model, 4) a Single Item Cause Indicator model, or 5) a Mixed Multiple Indicator model. Specification of the measurement model has a major influence on decisions about item and scale design, the appropriate application of statistical validation methods, and the suitability of the resulting measure for a particular use in clinical and population-based outcomes research activities. BioMed Central 2006-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1590011/ /pubmed/16995937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-65 Text en Copyright © 2006 Atkinson and Lennox; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Atkinson, Mark J
Lennox, Richard D
Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
title Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
title_full Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
title_fullStr Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
title_short Extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of Patient Reported Outcomes
title_sort extending basic principles of measurement models to the design and validation of patient reported outcomes
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16995937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-65
work_keys_str_mv AT atkinsonmarkj extendingbasicprinciplesofmeasurementmodelstothedesignandvalidationofpatientreportedoutcomes
AT lennoxrichardd extendingbasicprinciplesofmeasurementmodelstothedesignandvalidationofpatientreportedoutcomes