Cargando…

Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices

BACKGROUND: To explain why rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening including fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy (CS), and barium enema (BE), are low, this study assessed determinants of CRC screening from medical records. METHODS: Data were abstracted from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmerman, Richard K, Nowalk, Mary Patricia, Tabbarah, Melissa, Grufferman, Seymour
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16970813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-116
_version_ 1782130359741186048
author Zimmerman, Richard K
Nowalk, Mary Patricia
Tabbarah, Melissa
Grufferman, Seymour
author_facet Zimmerman, Richard K
Nowalk, Mary Patricia
Tabbarah, Melissa
Grufferman, Seymour
author_sort Zimmerman, Richard K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To explain why rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening including fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy (CS), and barium enema (BE), are low, this study assessed determinants of CRC screening from medical records. METHODS: Data were abstracted from patients aged ≥64 years selected from each clinician from 30 diverse primary care practices (n = 981). Measurements included the rates of annual FOBT, ever receiving FOBT, ever receiving FS/CS/BE under a combination variable, endoscopy/barium enema (EBE). RESULTS: Over five years, 8% had received annual FOBT, 53% had ever received FOBT and 22% had ever received EBE. Annual FOBT was negatively associated with female gender, odds ratio (OR) = .23; 95% confidence interval = .12–.44 and positively associated with routinely receiving influenza vaccine, OR = 2.55 (1.45–4.47); and more office visits: 3 to <5 visits/year, OR = 2.78 (1.41–5.51), and ≥5 visits/year, OR = 3.35 (1.52-7.42). Ever receiving EBE was negatively associated with age ≥75 years, OR = .66 (.46–.95); being widowed, OR = .59 (.38–.92); and positively associated with more office visits: 3 to <5 visits/year, OR = 1.83 (1.18–2.82) and ≥5 visits/year, OR = 2.01 (1.14–3.55). CONCLUSION: Overall CRC screening rates were low, but were related to the number of primary care office visits. FOBT was related to immunization status, suggesting the possible benefit of linking these preventive services.
format Text
id pubmed-1590019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15900192006-10-05 Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices Zimmerman, Richard K Nowalk, Mary Patricia Tabbarah, Melissa Grufferman, Seymour BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: To explain why rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening including fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy (CS), and barium enema (BE), are low, this study assessed determinants of CRC screening from medical records. METHODS: Data were abstracted from patients aged ≥64 years selected from each clinician from 30 diverse primary care practices (n = 981). Measurements included the rates of annual FOBT, ever receiving FOBT, ever receiving FS/CS/BE under a combination variable, endoscopy/barium enema (EBE). RESULTS: Over five years, 8% had received annual FOBT, 53% had ever received FOBT and 22% had ever received EBE. Annual FOBT was negatively associated with female gender, odds ratio (OR) = .23; 95% confidence interval = .12–.44 and positively associated with routinely receiving influenza vaccine, OR = 2.55 (1.45–4.47); and more office visits: 3 to <5 visits/year, OR = 2.78 (1.41–5.51), and ≥5 visits/year, OR = 3.35 (1.52-7.42). Ever receiving EBE was negatively associated with age ≥75 years, OR = .66 (.46–.95); being widowed, OR = .59 (.38–.92); and positively associated with more office visits: 3 to <5 visits/year, OR = 1.83 (1.18–2.82) and ≥5 visits/year, OR = 2.01 (1.14–3.55). CONCLUSION: Overall CRC screening rates were low, but were related to the number of primary care office visits. FOBT was related to immunization status, suggesting the possible benefit of linking these preventive services. BioMed Central 2006-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1590019/ /pubmed/16970813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-116 Text en Copyright © 2006 Zimmerman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zimmerman, Richard K
Nowalk, Mary Patricia
Tabbarah, Melissa
Grufferman, Seymour
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
title Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
title_full Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
title_fullStr Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
title_short Predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
title_sort predictors of colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16970813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-116
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermanrichardk predictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningindiverseprimarycarepractices
AT nowalkmarypatricia predictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningindiverseprimarycarepractices
AT tabbarahmelissa predictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningindiverseprimarycarepractices
AT gruffermanseymour predictorsofcolorectalcancerscreeningindiverseprimarycarepractices