Cargando…
Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
BACKGROUND: The Levels of Evidence Rating System is widely believed to categorize studies by quality, with Level I studies representing the highest quality evidence. We aimed to determine the reporting quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) published in the most frequently cited general orth...
Autores principales: | Poolman, Rudolf W, Struijs, Peter AA, Krips, Rover, Sierevelt, Inger N, Lutz, Kristina H, Bhandari, Mohit |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1590046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16965628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-44 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago
por: Siebelt, Michiel, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?: A systematic review
por: Wamper, Kim E, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Comparison of published orthopaedic trauma trials following registration in Clinicaltrials.gov
por: Gandhi, Rajiv, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Reverse wedge effect following intramedullary nail fixation of trochanteric fracture, what does it imply?
por: Hao, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures – an update
por: Heineman, David J., et al.
Publicado: (2012)