Cargando…

Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification

BACKGROUND: A protocol of electronic portal imaging (EPI) registration for the verification of radiation treatment fields has been implemented at our institution. A template is generated using the reference images, which is then registered with the EPI for treatment verification. This study examines...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berthelet, Eric, Truong, Pauline T, Zavgorodni, Sergei, Moravan, Veronika, Liu, Mitchell C, Runkel, Jim, Bendorffe, Bill, Sayers, Dorothy
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1592498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16984655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-37
_version_ 1782130407988264960
author Berthelet, Eric
Truong, Pauline T
Zavgorodni, Sergei
Moravan, Veronika
Liu, Mitchell C
Runkel, Jim
Bendorffe, Bill
Sayers, Dorothy
author_facet Berthelet, Eric
Truong, Pauline T
Zavgorodni, Sergei
Moravan, Veronika
Liu, Mitchell C
Runkel, Jim
Bendorffe, Bill
Sayers, Dorothy
author_sort Berthelet, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A protocol of electronic portal imaging (EPI) registration for the verification of radiation treatment fields has been implemented at our institution. A template is generated using the reference images, which is then registered with the EPI for treatment verification. This study examines interobserver consistency among trained radiation therapists in the registration and verification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing EBRT were analyzed. The EPIs from the initial 10 fractions were registered independently by 6 trained radiation therapist observers. For each fraction, an anterior-posterior (AP or PA) and left lateral (Lat) EPIs were generated and registered with the reference images. Two measures of displacement for the AP EPI in the superior-inferior (SI) and right left (RL) directions and two measures of displacement for the Lat EPI in the AP and SI directions were prospectively recorded. A total of 2400 images and 4800 measures were analyzed. Means and standard deviations, as well as systematic and random errors were calculated for each observer. Differences between observers were compared using the chi-square test. Variance components analysis was used to evaluate how much variance is attributed to the observers. Time trends were estimated using repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Inter-observer variation expressed as the standard deviation of the six observers' measurements within each image were 0.7, 1.0, 1.7 and 1.4 mm for APLR, APSI, LatAP and LatSI respectively. Variance components analysis showed that the variation attributed to the observers was small compared to variation due to the images. On repeated measure analysis, time trends were apparent only for the APLR and LatSI measurements. Their magnitude however was small. CONCLUSION: No clinically important systematic observer effect or time trends were identified in the registration of EPI by the radiation therapist observers in this study. These findings are useful in the documentation of consistency and reliability in the quality assurance of treatment verification of EBRT for prostate cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-1592498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15924982006-10-07 Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification Berthelet, Eric Truong, Pauline T Zavgorodni, Sergei Moravan, Veronika Liu, Mitchell C Runkel, Jim Bendorffe, Bill Sayers, Dorothy Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: A protocol of electronic portal imaging (EPI) registration for the verification of radiation treatment fields has been implemented at our institution. A template is generated using the reference images, which is then registered with the EPI for treatment verification. This study examines interobserver consistency among trained radiation therapists in the registration and verification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing EBRT were analyzed. The EPIs from the initial 10 fractions were registered independently by 6 trained radiation therapist observers. For each fraction, an anterior-posterior (AP or PA) and left lateral (Lat) EPIs were generated and registered with the reference images. Two measures of displacement for the AP EPI in the superior-inferior (SI) and right left (RL) directions and two measures of displacement for the Lat EPI in the AP and SI directions were prospectively recorded. A total of 2400 images and 4800 measures were analyzed. Means and standard deviations, as well as systematic and random errors were calculated for each observer. Differences between observers were compared using the chi-square test. Variance components analysis was used to evaluate how much variance is attributed to the observers. Time trends were estimated using repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Inter-observer variation expressed as the standard deviation of the six observers' measurements within each image were 0.7, 1.0, 1.7 and 1.4 mm for APLR, APSI, LatAP and LatSI respectively. Variance components analysis showed that the variation attributed to the observers was small compared to variation due to the images. On repeated measure analysis, time trends were apparent only for the APLR and LatSI measurements. Their magnitude however was small. CONCLUSION: No clinically important systematic observer effect or time trends were identified in the registration of EPI by the radiation therapist observers in this study. These findings are useful in the documentation of consistency and reliability in the quality assurance of treatment verification of EBRT for prostate cancer. BioMed Central 2006-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1592498/ /pubmed/16984655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-37 Text en Copyright © 2006 Berthelet et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Berthelet, Eric
Truong, Pauline T
Zavgorodni, Sergei
Moravan, Veronika
Liu, Mitchell C
Runkel, Jim
Bendorffe, Bill
Sayers, Dorothy
Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
title Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
title_full Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
title_fullStr Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
title_full_unstemmed Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
title_short Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
title_sort consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1592498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16984655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-37
work_keys_str_mv AT bertheleteric consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT truongpaulinet consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT zavgorodnisergei consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT moravanveronika consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT liumitchellc consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT runkeljim consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT bendorffebill consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification
AT sayersdorothy consistencyinelectronicportalimagingregistrationinprostatecancerradiationtreatmentverification