Cargando…
How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure
The evaluation and use of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures requires detailed understanding of the meaning of the outcome of interest. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently presented its draft guidance and view on the use of PRO measures as endpoints in clinical trials. One section o...
Autores principales: | Brożek, Jan L, Guyatt, Gordon H, Schünemann, Holger J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1599713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17005037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-69 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Interpreting the results of patient reported outcome measures in clinical trials: The clinician's perspective
por: Schünemann, Holger J, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis – clinical management guided by the evidence-based GRADE approach: what arguments can be made against transparency in guideline development?
por: Rochwerg, Bram, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Commentary: Can pathologists interpret digital images as well as they interpret microscope slides?
por: Bauer, Thomas W.
Publicado: (2016) -
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
por: Langendam, Miranda W, et al.
Publicado: (2013)