Cargando…

Secondary penile tumours revisited

OBJECTIVE: To highlight the salient features of metastatic malignancies involving the penis, with special reference to the primary tumour sites, metastatic mechanisms, clinical features, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cherian, Jacob, Rajan, Sreekumar, Thwaini, Ali, Elmasry, Yaser, Shah, Tariq, Puri, Rajiv
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1618838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17032461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-33
_version_ 1782130529963868160
author Cherian, Jacob
Rajan, Sreekumar
Thwaini, Ali
Elmasry, Yaser
Shah, Tariq
Puri, Rajiv
author_facet Cherian, Jacob
Rajan, Sreekumar
Thwaini, Ali
Elmasry, Yaser
Shah, Tariq
Puri, Rajiv
author_sort Cherian, Jacob
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To highlight the salient features of metastatic malignancies involving the penis, with special reference to the primary tumour sites, metastatic mechanisms, clinical features, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE, using the keywords 'penis', 'secondary malignancy', 'metastasis' and 'malignant priapism' to identify reviews and case reports of secondary penile malignancy. A case of rare clinical presentation of metastatic penile lesion is presented along with the review of the literature. CONCLUSION: Secondary malignancy of the penis is a rare clinical entity, despite the rich vascularisation of this organ. The majority of metastatic lesions take their origin from the neighbouring genito-urinary organs, mainly prostate and bladder. These lesions are often associated with disseminated malignancy and hence have a poor outcome. Nodular or ulcerative lesions involving the corpora cavernosa or priapism are the main modes of clinical presentation. In most cases, only palliative or supportive therapy is indicated.
format Text
id pubmed-1618838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16188382006-10-21 Secondary penile tumours revisited Cherian, Jacob Rajan, Sreekumar Thwaini, Ali Elmasry, Yaser Shah, Tariq Puri, Rajiv Int Semin Surg Oncol Review OBJECTIVE: To highlight the salient features of metastatic malignancies involving the penis, with special reference to the primary tumour sites, metastatic mechanisms, clinical features, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE, using the keywords 'penis', 'secondary malignancy', 'metastasis' and 'malignant priapism' to identify reviews and case reports of secondary penile malignancy. A case of rare clinical presentation of metastatic penile lesion is presented along with the review of the literature. CONCLUSION: Secondary malignancy of the penis is a rare clinical entity, despite the rich vascularisation of this organ. The majority of metastatic lesions take their origin from the neighbouring genito-urinary organs, mainly prostate and bladder. These lesions are often associated with disseminated malignancy and hence have a poor outcome. Nodular or ulcerative lesions involving the corpora cavernosa or priapism are the main modes of clinical presentation. In most cases, only palliative or supportive therapy is indicated. BioMed Central 2006-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1618838/ /pubmed/17032461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-33 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cherian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Cherian, Jacob
Rajan, Sreekumar
Thwaini, Ali
Elmasry, Yaser
Shah, Tariq
Puri, Rajiv
Secondary penile tumours revisited
title Secondary penile tumours revisited
title_full Secondary penile tumours revisited
title_fullStr Secondary penile tumours revisited
title_full_unstemmed Secondary penile tumours revisited
title_short Secondary penile tumours revisited
title_sort secondary penile tumours revisited
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1618838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17032461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7800-3-33
work_keys_str_mv AT cherianjacob secondarypeniletumoursrevisited
AT rajansreekumar secondarypeniletumoursrevisited
AT thwainiali secondarypeniletumoursrevisited
AT elmasryyaser secondarypeniletumoursrevisited
AT shahtariq secondarypeniletumoursrevisited
AT purirajiv secondarypeniletumoursrevisited