Cargando…

Distributed data processing for public health surveillance

BACKGROUND: Many systems for routine public health surveillance rely on centralized collection of potentially identifiable, individual, identifiable personal health information (PHI) records. Although individual, identifiable patient records are essential for conditions for which there is mandated r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazarus, Ross, Yih, Katherine, Platt, Richard
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1618842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16984658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-235
_version_ 1782130530926460928
author Lazarus, Ross
Yih, Katherine
Platt, Richard
author_facet Lazarus, Ross
Yih, Katherine
Platt, Richard
author_sort Lazarus, Ross
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many systems for routine public health surveillance rely on centralized collection of potentially identifiable, individual, identifiable personal health information (PHI) records. Although individual, identifiable patient records are essential for conditions for which there is mandated reporting, such as tuberculosis or sexually transmitted diseases, they are not routinely required for effective syndromic surveillance. Public concern about the routine collection of large quantities of PHI to support non-traditional public health functions may make alternative surveillance methods that do not rely on centralized identifiable PHI databases increasingly desirable. METHODS: The National Bioterrorism Syndromic Surveillance Demonstration Program (NDP) is an example of one alternative model. All PHI in this system is initially processed within the secured infrastructure of the health care provider that collects and holds the data, using uniform software distributed and supported by the NDP. Only highly aggregated count data is transferred to the datacenter for statistical processing and display. RESULTS: Detailed, patient level information is readily available to the health care provider to elucidate signals observed in the aggregated data, or for ad hoc queries. We briefly describe the benefits and disadvantages associated with this distributed processing model for routine automated syndromic surveillance. CONCLUSION: For well-defined surveillance requirements, the model can be successfully deployed with very low risk of inadvertent disclosure of PHI – a feature that may make participation in surveillance systems more feasible for organizations and more appealing to the individuals whose PHI they hold. It is possible to design and implement distributed systems to support non-routine public health needs if required.
format Text
id pubmed-1618842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16188422006-10-21 Distributed data processing for public health surveillance Lazarus, Ross Yih, Katherine Platt, Richard BMC Public Health Correspondence BACKGROUND: Many systems for routine public health surveillance rely on centralized collection of potentially identifiable, individual, identifiable personal health information (PHI) records. Although individual, identifiable patient records are essential for conditions for which there is mandated reporting, such as tuberculosis or sexually transmitted diseases, they are not routinely required for effective syndromic surveillance. Public concern about the routine collection of large quantities of PHI to support non-traditional public health functions may make alternative surveillance methods that do not rely on centralized identifiable PHI databases increasingly desirable. METHODS: The National Bioterrorism Syndromic Surveillance Demonstration Program (NDP) is an example of one alternative model. All PHI in this system is initially processed within the secured infrastructure of the health care provider that collects and holds the data, using uniform software distributed and supported by the NDP. Only highly aggregated count data is transferred to the datacenter for statistical processing and display. RESULTS: Detailed, patient level information is readily available to the health care provider to elucidate signals observed in the aggregated data, or for ad hoc queries. We briefly describe the benefits and disadvantages associated with this distributed processing model for routine automated syndromic surveillance. CONCLUSION: For well-defined surveillance requirements, the model can be successfully deployed with very low risk of inadvertent disclosure of PHI – a feature that may make participation in surveillance systems more feasible for organizations and more appealing to the individuals whose PHI they hold. It is possible to design and implement distributed systems to support non-routine public health needs if required. BioMed Central 2006-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1618842/ /pubmed/16984658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-235 Text en Copyright © 2006 Lazarus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Lazarus, Ross
Yih, Katherine
Platt, Richard
Distributed data processing for public health surveillance
title Distributed data processing for public health surveillance
title_full Distributed data processing for public health surveillance
title_fullStr Distributed data processing for public health surveillance
title_full_unstemmed Distributed data processing for public health surveillance
title_short Distributed data processing for public health surveillance
title_sort distributed data processing for public health surveillance
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1618842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16984658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-235
work_keys_str_mv AT lazarusross distributeddataprocessingforpublichealthsurveillance
AT yihkatherine distributeddataprocessingforpublichealthsurveillance
AT plattrichard distributeddataprocessingforpublichealthsurveillance