Cargando…

Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake

BACKGROUND: The population's views concerning influenza vaccine are important in maintaining high uptake of a vaccine that is required yearly to be effective. Little is also known about the views of the more vulnerable older population over the age of 74 years. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangtani, Punam, Breeze, Elizabeth, Stirling, Sue, Hanciles, Smita, Kovats, Sari, Fletcher, Astrid
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17034625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-249
_version_ 1782130549091991552
author Mangtani, Punam
Breeze, Elizabeth
Stirling, Sue
Hanciles, Smita
Kovats, Sari
Fletcher, Astrid
author_facet Mangtani, Punam
Breeze, Elizabeth
Stirling, Sue
Hanciles, Smita
Kovats, Sari
Fletcher, Astrid
author_sort Mangtani, Punam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The population's views concerning influenza vaccine are important in maintaining high uptake of a vaccine that is required yearly to be effective. Little is also known about the views of the more vulnerable older population over the age of 74 years. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of community dwelling people aged 75 years and over wh, previous participant was conducted using a postal questionnaire. Responses were analysed by vaccine uptake records and by socio-demographic and medical factors. RESULTS: 85% of men and 75% of women were vaccinated against influenza in the previous year. Over 80% reported being influenced by a recommendation by a health care worker. The most common reason reported for non uptake was good health (44%), or illness considered to be due to the vaccine (25%). An exploration of the crude associations with socio-economic status suggested there may be some differences in the population with these two main reasons. 81% of people reporting good health lived in owner occupied housing with central heating vs. 63% who did not state this as a reason (p = 0.04), whereas people reporting ill health due to the vaccine was associated with poorer social circumstances. 11% lived in the least deprived neighbourhood compared to 36% who did not state this as a reason (p = 0.05) and were less likely to be currently married than those who did not state this as a reason (25% vs 48% p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Vaccine uptake was high, but non uptake was still noted in 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men aged over 74 years. Around 70% reported they would not have the vaccine in the following year. The divergent reasons for non-uptake, and the positive influence from a health care worker, suggests further uptake will require education and encouragement from a health care worker tailored towards the different views for not having influenza vaccination. Non-uptake of influenza vaccine because people viewed themselves as in good health may explain the modest socio-economic differentials in influenza vaccine uptake in elderly people noted elsewhere. Reporting of ill-health due to the vaccine may be associated with a different, poorer background.
format Text
id pubmed-1621069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16210692006-10-24 Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake Mangtani, Punam Breeze, Elizabeth Stirling, Sue Hanciles, Smita Kovats, Sari Fletcher, Astrid BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The population's views concerning influenza vaccine are important in maintaining high uptake of a vaccine that is required yearly to be effective. Little is also known about the views of the more vulnerable older population over the age of 74 years. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of community dwelling people aged 75 years and over wh, previous participant was conducted using a postal questionnaire. Responses were analysed by vaccine uptake records and by socio-demographic and medical factors. RESULTS: 85% of men and 75% of women were vaccinated against influenza in the previous year. Over 80% reported being influenced by a recommendation by a health care worker. The most common reason reported for non uptake was good health (44%), or illness considered to be due to the vaccine (25%). An exploration of the crude associations with socio-economic status suggested there may be some differences in the population with these two main reasons. 81% of people reporting good health lived in owner occupied housing with central heating vs. 63% who did not state this as a reason (p = 0.04), whereas people reporting ill health due to the vaccine was associated with poorer social circumstances. 11% lived in the least deprived neighbourhood compared to 36% who did not state this as a reason (p = 0.05) and were less likely to be currently married than those who did not state this as a reason (25% vs 48% p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Vaccine uptake was high, but non uptake was still noted in 1 in 4 women and 1 in 7 men aged over 74 years. Around 70% reported they would not have the vaccine in the following year. The divergent reasons for non-uptake, and the positive influence from a health care worker, suggests further uptake will require education and encouragement from a health care worker tailored towards the different views for not having influenza vaccination. Non-uptake of influenza vaccine because people viewed themselves as in good health may explain the modest socio-economic differentials in influenza vaccine uptake in elderly people noted elsewhere. Reporting of ill-health due to the vaccine may be associated with a different, poorer background. BioMed Central 2006-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1621069/ /pubmed/17034625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-249 Text en Copyright © 2006 Mangtani et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mangtani, Punam
Breeze, Elizabeth
Stirling, Sue
Hanciles, Smita
Kovats, Sari
Fletcher, Astrid
Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
title Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
title_full Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
title_fullStr Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
title_short Cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
title_sort cross-sectional survey of older peoples' views related to influenza vaccine uptake
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17034625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-249
work_keys_str_mv AT mangtanipunam crosssectionalsurveyofolderpeoplesviewsrelatedtoinfluenzavaccineuptake
AT breezeelizabeth crosssectionalsurveyofolderpeoplesviewsrelatedtoinfluenzavaccineuptake
AT stirlingsue crosssectionalsurveyofolderpeoplesviewsrelatedtoinfluenzavaccineuptake
AT hancilessmita crosssectionalsurveyofolderpeoplesviewsrelatedtoinfluenzavaccineuptake
AT kovatssari crosssectionalsurveyofolderpeoplesviewsrelatedtoinfluenzavaccineuptake
AT fletcherastrid crosssectionalsurveyofolderpeoplesviewsrelatedtoinfluenzavaccineuptake