Cargando…

Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: We present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anttila, Ahti, Hakama, Matti, Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura, Nieminen, Pekka
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17042938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-252
_version_ 1782130549562802176
author Anttila, Ahti
Hakama, Matti
Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura
Nieminen, Pekka
author_facet Anttila, Ahti
Hakama, Matti
Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura
Nieminen, Pekka
author_sort Anttila, Ahti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: We present here a randomised evaluation trial design integrated to the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, in order to evaluate renewal of the programme using emerging technological alternatives. The main aim of the evaluation is to assess screening effectiveness, using subsequent cancers as the outcome and screen-detected pre-cancers as surrogates. For the time being, approximately 863,000 women have been allocated to automation-assisted cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, or to conventional cytology within the organised screening programme. Follow-up results on subsequent cervical cancers will become available during 2007–2015. DISCUSSION: Large-scale randomised trials are useful to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness issues of the most important technological alternatives in the screening programmes for cervical cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-1621071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16210712006-10-24 Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial Anttila, Ahti Hakama, Matti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Nieminen, Pekka BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: We present here a randomised evaluation trial design integrated to the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, in order to evaluate renewal of the programme using emerging technological alternatives. The main aim of the evaluation is to assess screening effectiveness, using subsequent cancers as the outcome and screen-detected pre-cancers as surrogates. For the time being, approximately 863,000 women have been allocated to automation-assisted cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, or to conventional cytology within the organised screening programme. Follow-up results on subsequent cervical cancers will become available during 2007–2015. DISCUSSION: Large-scale randomised trials are useful to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness issues of the most important technological alternatives in the screening programmes for cervical cancer. BioMed Central 2006-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1621071/ /pubmed/17042938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-252 Text en Copyright © 2006 Anttila et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Anttila, Ahti
Hakama, Matti
Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura
Nieminen, Pekka
Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
title Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
title_full Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
title_fullStr Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
title_full_unstemmed Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
title_short Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
title_sort alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17042938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-252
work_keys_str_mv AT anttilaahti alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial
AT hakamamatti alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial
AT kotaniemitalonenlaura alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial
AT nieminenpekka alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial