Cargando…
Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: We present...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17042938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-252 |
_version_ | 1782130549562802176 |
---|---|
author | Anttila, Ahti Hakama, Matti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Nieminen, Pekka |
author_facet | Anttila, Ahti Hakama, Matti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Nieminen, Pekka |
author_sort | Anttila, Ahti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: We present here a randomised evaluation trial design integrated to the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, in order to evaluate renewal of the programme using emerging technological alternatives. The main aim of the evaluation is to assess screening effectiveness, using subsequent cancers as the outcome and screen-detected pre-cancers as surrogates. For the time being, approximately 863,000 women have been allocated to automation-assisted cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, or to conventional cytology within the organised screening programme. Follow-up results on subsequent cervical cancers will become available during 2007–2015. DISCUSSION: Large-scale randomised trials are useful to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness issues of the most important technological alternatives in the screening programmes for cervical cancer. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1621071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16210712006-10-24 Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial Anttila, Ahti Hakama, Matti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Nieminen, Pekka BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening programmes have markedly reduced the incidence and mortality rates of the disease. A substantial amount of deaths from the disease could be prevented further by organised screening programmes or improving currently running programmes. METHODS/DESIGN: We present here a randomised evaluation trial design integrated to the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme, in order to evaluate renewal of the programme using emerging technological alternatives. The main aim of the evaluation is to assess screening effectiveness, using subsequent cancers as the outcome and screen-detected pre-cancers as surrogates. For the time being, approximately 863,000 women have been allocated to automation-assisted cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, or to conventional cytology within the organised screening programme. Follow-up results on subsequent cervical cancers will become available during 2007–2015. DISCUSSION: Large-scale randomised trials are useful to clarify effectiveness and cost-effectiveness issues of the most important technological alternatives in the screening programmes for cervical cancer. BioMed Central 2006-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1621071/ /pubmed/17042938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-252 Text en Copyright © 2006 Anttila et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Anttila, Ahti Hakama, Matti Kotaniemi-Talonen, Laura Nieminen, Pekka Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
title | Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
title_full | Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
title_fullStr | Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
title_short | Alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
title_sort | alternative technologies in cervical cancer screening: a randomised evaluation trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17042938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anttilaahti alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial AT hakamamatti alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial AT kotaniemitalonenlaura alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial AT nieminenpekka alternativetechnologiesincervicalcancerscreeningarandomisedevaluationtrial |