Cargando…
The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes
BACKGROUND: With the increased availability of sequenced genomes there have been several initiatives to infer evolutionary relationships by whole genome characteristics. One of these studies suggested good congruence between genome synteny, shared gene content, 16S ribosomal DNA identity, codon usag...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17040564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-84 |
_version_ | 1782130552181096448 |
---|---|
author | van Passel, Mark WJ Kuramae, Eiko E Luyf, Angela CM Bart, Aldert Boekhout, Teun |
author_facet | van Passel, Mark WJ Kuramae, Eiko E Luyf, Angela CM Bart, Aldert Boekhout, Teun |
author_sort | van Passel, Mark WJ |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the increased availability of sequenced genomes there have been several initiatives to infer evolutionary relationships by whole genome characteristics. One of these studies suggested good congruence between genome synteny, shared gene content, 16S ribosomal DNA identity, codon usage and the genome signature in prokaryotes. Here we rigorously test the phylogenetic signal of the genome signature, which consists of the genome-specific relative frequencies of dinucleotides, on 334 sequenced prokaryotic genome sequences. RESULTS: Intrageneric comparisons show that in general the genomic dissimilarity scores are higher than in intraspecific comparisons, in accordance with the suggested phylogenetic signal of the genome signature. Exceptions to this trend, (Bartonella spp., Bordetella spp., Salmonella spp. and Yersinia spp.), which have low average intrageneric genomic dissimilarity scores, suggest that members of these genera might be considered the same species. On the other hand, high genomic dissimilarity values for intraspecific analyses suggest that in some cases (e.g.Prochlorococcus marinus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Buchnera aphidicola and Rhodopseudomonas palustris) different strains from the same species may actually represent different species. Comparing 16S rDNA identity with genomic dissimilarity values corroborates the previously suggested trend in phylogenetic signal, albeit that the dissimilarity values only provide low resolution. CONCLUSION: The genome signature has a distinct phylogenetic signal, independent of individual genetic marker genes. A reliable phylogenetic clustering cannot be based on dissimilarity values alone, as bootstrapping is not possible for this parameter. It can however be used to support or refute a given phylogeny and resulting taxonomy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1621082 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16210822006-10-24 The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes van Passel, Mark WJ Kuramae, Eiko E Luyf, Angela CM Bart, Aldert Boekhout, Teun BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: With the increased availability of sequenced genomes there have been several initiatives to infer evolutionary relationships by whole genome characteristics. One of these studies suggested good congruence between genome synteny, shared gene content, 16S ribosomal DNA identity, codon usage and the genome signature in prokaryotes. Here we rigorously test the phylogenetic signal of the genome signature, which consists of the genome-specific relative frequencies of dinucleotides, on 334 sequenced prokaryotic genome sequences. RESULTS: Intrageneric comparisons show that in general the genomic dissimilarity scores are higher than in intraspecific comparisons, in accordance with the suggested phylogenetic signal of the genome signature. Exceptions to this trend, (Bartonella spp., Bordetella spp., Salmonella spp. and Yersinia spp.), which have low average intrageneric genomic dissimilarity scores, suggest that members of these genera might be considered the same species. On the other hand, high genomic dissimilarity values for intraspecific analyses suggest that in some cases (e.g.Prochlorococcus marinus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Buchnera aphidicola and Rhodopseudomonas palustris) different strains from the same species may actually represent different species. Comparing 16S rDNA identity with genomic dissimilarity values corroborates the previously suggested trend in phylogenetic signal, albeit that the dissimilarity values only provide low resolution. CONCLUSION: The genome signature has a distinct phylogenetic signal, independent of individual genetic marker genes. A reliable phylogenetic clustering cannot be based on dissimilarity values alone, as bootstrapping is not possible for this parameter. It can however be used to support or refute a given phylogeny and resulting taxonomy. BioMed Central 2006-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1621082/ /pubmed/17040564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-84 Text en Copyright © 2006 van Passel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Passel, Mark WJ Kuramae, Eiko E Luyf, Angela CM Bart, Aldert Boekhout, Teun The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
title | The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
title_full | The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
title_fullStr | The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
title_full_unstemmed | The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
title_short | The reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
title_sort | reach of the genome signature in prokaryotes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1621082/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17040564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-6-84 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanpasselmarkwj thereachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT kuramaeeikoe thereachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT luyfangelacm thereachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT bartaldert thereachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT boekhoutteun thereachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT vanpasselmarkwj reachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT kuramaeeikoe reachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT luyfangelacm reachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT bartaldert reachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes AT boekhoutteun reachofthegenomesignatureinprokaryotes |