Cargando…

Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks

BACKGROUND: The design of an optimal neuroprostheses controller and its clinical use presents several challenges. First, the physiological system is characterized by highly inter-subjects varying properties and also by non stationary behaviour with time, due to conditioning level and fatigue. Second...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedrocchi, Alessandra, Ferrante, Simona, De Momi, Elena, Ferrigno, Giancarlo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1624841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17029636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-25
_version_ 1782130573153665024
author Pedrocchi, Alessandra
Ferrante, Simona
De Momi, Elena
Ferrigno, Giancarlo
author_facet Pedrocchi, Alessandra
Ferrante, Simona
De Momi, Elena
Ferrigno, Giancarlo
author_sort Pedrocchi, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The design of an optimal neuroprostheses controller and its clinical use presents several challenges. First, the physiological system is characterized by highly inter-subjects varying properties and also by non stationary behaviour with time, due to conditioning level and fatigue. Secondly, the easiness to use in routine clinical practice requires experienced operators. Therefore, feedback controllers, avoiding long setting procedures, are required. METHODS: The error mapping controller (EMC) here proposed uses artificial neural networks (ANNs) both for the design of an inverse model and of a feedback controller. A neuromuscular model is used to validate the performance of the controllers in simulations. The EMC performance is compared to a Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) included in an anti wind-up scheme (called PIDAW) and to a controller with an ANN as inverse model and a PID in the feedback loop (NEUROPID). In addition tests on the EMC robustness in response to variations of the Plant parameters and to mechanical disturbances are carried out. RESULTS: The EMC shows improvements with respect to the other controllers in tracking accuracy, capability to prolong exercise managing fatigue, robustness to parameter variations and resistance to mechanical disturbances. CONCLUSION: Different from the other controllers, the EMC is capable of balancing between tracking accuracy and mapping of fatigue during the exercise. In this way, it avoids overstressing muscles and allows a considerable prolongation of the movement. The collection of the training sets does not require any particular experimental setting and can be introduced in routine clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-1624841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16248412006-10-26 Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks Pedrocchi, Alessandra Ferrante, Simona De Momi, Elena Ferrigno, Giancarlo J Neuroengineering Rehabil Methodology BACKGROUND: The design of an optimal neuroprostheses controller and its clinical use presents several challenges. First, the physiological system is characterized by highly inter-subjects varying properties and also by non stationary behaviour with time, due to conditioning level and fatigue. Secondly, the easiness to use in routine clinical practice requires experienced operators. Therefore, feedback controllers, avoiding long setting procedures, are required. METHODS: The error mapping controller (EMC) here proposed uses artificial neural networks (ANNs) both for the design of an inverse model and of a feedback controller. A neuromuscular model is used to validate the performance of the controllers in simulations. The EMC performance is compared to a Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) included in an anti wind-up scheme (called PIDAW) and to a controller with an ANN as inverse model and a PID in the feedback loop (NEUROPID). In addition tests on the EMC robustness in response to variations of the Plant parameters and to mechanical disturbances are carried out. RESULTS: The EMC shows improvements with respect to the other controllers in tracking accuracy, capability to prolong exercise managing fatigue, robustness to parameter variations and resistance to mechanical disturbances. CONCLUSION: Different from the other controllers, the EMC is capable of balancing between tracking accuracy and mapping of fatigue during the exercise. In this way, it avoids overstressing muscles and allows a considerable prolongation of the movement. The collection of the training sets does not require any particular experimental setting and can be introduced in routine clinical practice. BioMed Central 2006-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1624841/ /pubmed/17029636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-25 Text en Copyright © 2006 Pedrocchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Pedrocchi, Alessandra
Ferrante, Simona
De Momi, Elena
Ferrigno, Giancarlo
Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
title Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
title_full Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
title_fullStr Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
title_short Error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
title_sort error mapping controller: a closed loop neuroprosthesis controlled by artificial neural networks
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1624841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17029636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-25
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrocchialessandra errormappingcontrolleraclosedloopneuroprosthesiscontrolledbyartificialneuralnetworks
AT ferrantesimona errormappingcontrolleraclosedloopneuroprosthesiscontrolledbyartificialneuralnetworks
AT demomielena errormappingcontrolleraclosedloopneuroprosthesiscontrolledbyartificialneuralnetworks
AT ferrignogiancarlo errormappingcontrolleraclosedloopneuroprosthesiscontrolledbyartificialneuralnetworks