Cargando…

Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly

BACKGROUND: Synchronization of action potentials between neurons is considered to be an encoding process that allows the grouping of various and multiple features of an image leading to a coherent perception. How this coding neuronal assembly is configured is debated. We have previously shown that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duret, Florence, Shumikhina, Svetlana, Molotchnikoff, Stéphane
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1633739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17069653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-72
_version_ 1782130636748750848
author Duret, Florence
Shumikhina, Svetlana
Molotchnikoff, Stéphane
author_facet Duret, Florence
Shumikhina, Svetlana
Molotchnikoff, Stéphane
author_sort Duret, Florence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Synchronization of action potentials between neurons is considered to be an encoding process that allows the grouping of various and multiple features of an image leading to a coherent perception. How this coding neuronal assembly is configured is debated. We have previously shown that the magnitude of synchronization between excited neurons is stimulus-dependent. In the present investigation we compare the levels of synchronization between synchronizing individual neurons and the synchronizing pool of cells to which they belong. RESULTS: Even though neurons belonged to their respective pools, some cells synchronized for all presented stimuli while others were rather selective and only a few stimulating conditions produced a significant synchronization. In addition the experiments show that one synchronizing pair rarely replicates the level of synchrony between corresponding groups of units. But when synchronizing clusters of neurons increase in number, the correlation (measured as a coefficient of determination) between unit synchronization and the synchronization between the entire pools of cells to which individual neurons belong improves. CONCLUSION: These results prompt the hypothesis that random or spontaneous synchronization becomes progressively less important, whereas coincident spikes related to encoding properties of targets gain significance because a particular configuration of an image biases the excitatory inputs in favor of connections driven by the applied features of the stimulus.
format Text
id pubmed-1633739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16337392006-11-03 Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly Duret, Florence Shumikhina, Svetlana Molotchnikoff, Stéphane BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Synchronization of action potentials between neurons is considered to be an encoding process that allows the grouping of various and multiple features of an image leading to a coherent perception. How this coding neuronal assembly is configured is debated. We have previously shown that the magnitude of synchronization between excited neurons is stimulus-dependent. In the present investigation we compare the levels of synchronization between synchronizing individual neurons and the synchronizing pool of cells to which they belong. RESULTS: Even though neurons belonged to their respective pools, some cells synchronized for all presented stimuli while others were rather selective and only a few stimulating conditions produced a significant synchronization. In addition the experiments show that one synchronizing pair rarely replicates the level of synchrony between corresponding groups of units. But when synchronizing clusters of neurons increase in number, the correlation (measured as a coefficient of determination) between unit synchronization and the synchronization between the entire pools of cells to which individual neurons belong improves. CONCLUSION: These results prompt the hypothesis that random or spontaneous synchronization becomes progressively less important, whereas coincident spikes related to encoding properties of targets gain significance because a particular configuration of an image biases the excitatory inputs in favor of connections driven by the applied features of the stimulus. BioMed Central 2006-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1633739/ /pubmed/17069653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-72 Text en Copyright © 2006 Duret et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duret, Florence
Shumikhina, Svetlana
Molotchnikoff, Stéphane
Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
title Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
title_full Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
title_fullStr Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
title_full_unstemmed Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
title_short Neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
title_sort neuron participation in a synchrony-encoding assembly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1633739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17069653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-72
work_keys_str_mv AT duretflorence neuronparticipationinasynchronyencodingassembly
AT shumikhinasvetlana neuronparticipationinasynchronyencodingassembly
AT molotchnikoffstephane neuronparticipationinasynchronyencodingassembly