Cargando…
Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated
We retrospectively evaluated acute toxicity in 88 patients that were treated with capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen. These patients included 28 (32%) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 (20%) with cholangiocarcinoma, 11 (13%) with ampullary carcinoma, 11 (13%) with other p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-41 |
_version_ | 1782130641927667712 |
---|---|
author | Das, Prajnan Wolff, Robert A Abbruzzese, James L Varadhachary, Gauri R Evans, Douglas B Vauthey, Jean Nicolas Baschnagel, Andrew Delclos, Marc E Krishnan, Sunil Janjan, Nora A Crane, Christopher H |
author_facet | Das, Prajnan Wolff, Robert A Abbruzzese, James L Varadhachary, Gauri R Evans, Douglas B Vauthey, Jean Nicolas Baschnagel, Andrew Delclos, Marc E Krishnan, Sunil Janjan, Nora A Crane, Christopher H |
author_sort | Das, Prajnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | We retrospectively evaluated acute toxicity in 88 patients that were treated with capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen. These patients included 28 (32%) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 (20%) with cholangiocarcinoma, 11 (13%) with ampullary carcinoma, 11 (13%) with other primary tumors, 14 (16%) with liver metastases, and 6 (7%) with metastases at other sites. The median dose of radiotherapy was 45 Gy (range 30–72 Gy). The median dose of capecitabine was 850 mg/m(2 )twice daily, with 77% receiving 800–900 mg/m(2 )twice daily. The highest grade of acute toxicity was Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade 0 in 5 (6%), grade 1 in 60 (68%), grade 2 in 18 (20%), and grade 3 in 5 (6%) patients. No patient had CTC grade 4 toxicity. The most common grade 2 toxicities were nausea, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, anorexia and diarrhea. The grade 3 toxicities included nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Three patients (3%) required hospitalization due to grade 3 acute toxicity. Capecitabine was interrupted, discontinued or given at an adjusted dose in 13 (15%) patients because of acute toxicity. Therefore, capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen appears to be well tolerated. Capecitabine may serve as an alternative to bolus or infusional 5-FU during chemoradiation for upper gastrointestinal malignancies. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1634749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16347492006-11-04 Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated Das, Prajnan Wolff, Robert A Abbruzzese, James L Varadhachary, Gauri R Evans, Douglas B Vauthey, Jean Nicolas Baschnagel, Andrew Delclos, Marc E Krishnan, Sunil Janjan, Nora A Crane, Christopher H Radiat Oncol Short Report We retrospectively evaluated acute toxicity in 88 patients that were treated with capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen. These patients included 28 (32%) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 18 (20%) with cholangiocarcinoma, 11 (13%) with ampullary carcinoma, 11 (13%) with other primary tumors, 14 (16%) with liver metastases, and 6 (7%) with metastases at other sites. The median dose of radiotherapy was 45 Gy (range 30–72 Gy). The median dose of capecitabine was 850 mg/m(2 )twice daily, with 77% receiving 800–900 mg/m(2 )twice daily. The highest grade of acute toxicity was Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade 0 in 5 (6%), grade 1 in 60 (68%), grade 2 in 18 (20%), and grade 3 in 5 (6%) patients. No patient had CTC grade 4 toxicity. The most common grade 2 toxicities were nausea, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, anorexia and diarrhea. The grade 3 toxicities included nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Three patients (3%) required hospitalization due to grade 3 acute toxicity. Capecitabine was interrupted, discontinued or given at an adjusted dose in 13 (15%) patients because of acute toxicity. Therefore, capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy to the upper abdomen appears to be well tolerated. Capecitabine may serve as an alternative to bolus or infusional 5-FU during chemoradiation for upper gastrointestinal malignancies. BioMed Central 2006-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1634749/ /pubmed/17062148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-41 Text en Copyright © 2006 Das et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Das, Prajnan Wolff, Robert A Abbruzzese, James L Varadhachary, Gauri R Evans, Douglas B Vauthey, Jean Nicolas Baschnagel, Andrew Delclos, Marc E Krishnan, Sunil Janjan, Nora A Crane, Christopher H Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
title | Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
title_full | Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
title_fullStr | Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
title_full_unstemmed | Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
title_short | Concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
title_sort | concurrent capecitabine and upper abdominal radiation therapy is well tolerated |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-41 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasprajnan concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT wolffroberta concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT abbruzzesejamesl concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT varadhacharygaurir concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT evansdouglasb concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT vautheyjeannicolas concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT baschnagelandrew concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT delclosmarce concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT krishnansunil concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT janjannoraa concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated AT cranechristopherh concurrentcapecitabineandupperabdominalradiationtherapyiswelltolerated |