Cargando…

The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers

BACKGROUND: Neck and upper limb symptoms are frequently reported by computer workers. Work style interventions are most commonly used to reduce work-related neck and upper limb symptoms but lifestyle physical activity interventions are becoming more popular to enhance workers health and reduce work-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernaards, Claire M, Ariëns, Geertje AM, Hildebrandt, Vincent H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-80
_version_ 1782130646633676800
author Bernaards, Claire M
Ariëns, Geertje AM
Hildebrandt, Vincent H
author_facet Bernaards, Claire M
Ariëns, Geertje AM
Hildebrandt, Vincent H
author_sort Bernaards, Claire M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neck and upper limb symptoms are frequently reported by computer workers. Work style interventions are most commonly used to reduce work-related neck and upper limb symptoms but lifestyle physical activity interventions are becoming more popular to enhance workers health and reduce work-related symptoms. A combined approach targeting work style and lifestyle physical activity seems promising, but little is known on the effectiveness of such combined interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: The RSI@Work study is a randomised controlled trial that aims to assess the added value of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention to reduce neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers. Computer workers from seven Dutch companies with frequent or long-term neck and upper limb symptoms in the preceding six months and/or the last two weeks are randomised into three groups: (1) work style group, (2) work style and physical activity group, or (3) control group. The work style intervention consists of six group meetings in a six month period that take place at the workplace, during work time, and under the supervision of a specially trained counsellor. The goal of this intervention is to stimulate workplace adjustment and to improve body posture, the number and quality of breaks and coping behaviour with regard to high work demands. In the combined (work style and physical activity) intervention the additional goal is to increase moderate to heavy physical activity. The control group receives usual care. Primary outcome measures are degree of recovery, pain intensity, disability, number of days with neck and upper limb symptoms, and number of months without neck and upper limb symptoms. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and six and 12 months after randomisation. Cost-effectiveness of the group meetings will be assessed using an employer's perspective. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first to assess the added value of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention in reducing neck and upper limb symptoms of computer workers. The results of the study are expected in 2007.
format Text
id pubmed-1634849
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16348492006-11-07 The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers Bernaards, Claire M Ariëns, Geertje AM Hildebrandt, Vincent H BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Neck and upper limb symptoms are frequently reported by computer workers. Work style interventions are most commonly used to reduce work-related neck and upper limb symptoms but lifestyle physical activity interventions are becoming more popular to enhance workers health and reduce work-related symptoms. A combined approach targeting work style and lifestyle physical activity seems promising, but little is known on the effectiveness of such combined interventions. METHODS/DESIGN: The RSI@Work study is a randomised controlled trial that aims to assess the added value of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention to reduce neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers. Computer workers from seven Dutch companies with frequent or long-term neck and upper limb symptoms in the preceding six months and/or the last two weeks are randomised into three groups: (1) work style group, (2) work style and physical activity group, or (3) control group. The work style intervention consists of six group meetings in a six month period that take place at the workplace, during work time, and under the supervision of a specially trained counsellor. The goal of this intervention is to stimulate workplace adjustment and to improve body posture, the number and quality of breaks and coping behaviour with regard to high work demands. In the combined (work style and physical activity) intervention the additional goal is to increase moderate to heavy physical activity. The control group receives usual care. Primary outcome measures are degree of recovery, pain intensity, disability, number of days with neck and upper limb symptoms, and number of months without neck and upper limb symptoms. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and six and 12 months after randomisation. Cost-effectiveness of the group meetings will be assessed using an employer's perspective. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first to assess the added value of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention in reducing neck and upper limb symptoms of computer workers. The results of the study are expected in 2007. BioMed Central 2006-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1634849/ /pubmed/17062141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-80 Text en Copyright © 2006 Bernaards et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bernaards, Claire M
Ariëns, Geertje AM
Hildebrandt, Vincent H
The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
title The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
title_full The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
title_fullStr The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
title_full_unstemmed The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
title_short The (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
title_sort (cost-)effectiveness of a lifestyle physical activity intervention in addition to a work style intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17062141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-80
work_keys_str_mv AT bernaardsclairem thecosteffectivenessofalifestylephysicalactivityinterventioninadditiontoaworkstyleinterventionontherecoveryfromneckandupperlimbsymptomsincomputerworkers
AT ariensgeertjeam thecosteffectivenessofalifestylephysicalactivityinterventioninadditiontoaworkstyleinterventionontherecoveryfromneckandupperlimbsymptomsincomputerworkers
AT hildebrandtvincenth thecosteffectivenessofalifestylephysicalactivityinterventioninadditiontoaworkstyleinterventionontherecoveryfromneckandupperlimbsymptomsincomputerworkers
AT bernaardsclairem costeffectivenessofalifestylephysicalactivityinterventioninadditiontoaworkstyleinterventionontherecoveryfromneckandupperlimbsymptomsincomputerworkers
AT ariensgeertjeam costeffectivenessofalifestylephysicalactivityinterventioninadditiontoaworkstyleinterventionontherecoveryfromneckandupperlimbsymptomsincomputerworkers
AT hildebrandtvincenth costeffectivenessofalifestylephysicalactivityinterventioninadditiontoaworkstyleinterventionontherecoveryfromneckandupperlimbsymptomsincomputerworkers