Cargando…
Feedback on the FDA's February 2006 draft guidance on Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) measures from a developer of PRO measures
I believe that the FDA guidelines have already had an impact in encouraging good practice in the use of PROs. There are, however, important improvements that need to be made to the guidelines, particularly in the use of health status and quality of life terminology. It is essential to distinguish be...
Autor principal: | Bradley, Clare |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17029628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-78 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cognition comes of age: comments on the new FDA draft guidance for early Alzheimer’s disease
por: Harrison, John E.
Publicado: (2018) -
Capturing the patient experience in systemic lupus erythematosus: Are widely used measures fit-for-purpose and adherent to FDA PRO guidance recommendations?
por: Majercak, Kayleigh R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The FDA guidance for industry on PROs: the point of view of a pharmaceutical company
por: Arpinelli, Fabio, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Response to “Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11) and Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Meet FDA PRO Guidance”
por: Ascher, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Perspectives on the FDA Draft Guidances for Use of Adipose Tissue
por: Johnson, Martin L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)