Cargando…

Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meneghini, R Michael, Hallab, Nadim J, Berger, Richard A, Jacobs, Joshua J, Paprosky, Wayne G, Rosenberg, Aaron G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17150125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-1-5
_version_ 1782130659078176768
author Meneghini, R Michael
Hallab, Nadim J
Berger, Richard A
Jacobs, Joshua J
Paprosky, Wayne G
Rosenberg, Aaron G
author_facet Meneghini, R Michael
Hallab, Nadim J
Berger, Richard A
Jacobs, Joshua J
Paprosky, Wayne G
Rosenberg, Aaron G
author_sort Meneghini, R Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-four cadaveric femoral specimens were implanted with a fully porous-coated stem. Two different diameters were tested and the stems were implanted at multiple contact lengths without proximal bone support. Each specimen underwent torsional testing to failure and rotational micromotion was measured at the implant-bone interface. RESULTS: The larger stem diameter demonstrated a greater torsional stability for a given length of cortical contact (p ≤ 0.05). Decreasing length of diaphyseal contact length was associated with less torsional stability. Torsional resistance was inconsistent at 2 cm of depth. CONCLUSION: Larger stem diameters frequently used in revisions may be associated with less diaphyseal contact length to achieve equivalent rotational stability compared to smaller diameter stems. Furthermore, a minimum of 3 cm or 4 cm of diaphyseal contact with a porous-coated stem should be achieved in proximal femoral bone deficiency and will likely be dependent on the stem diameter utilized at the time of surgery.
format Text
id pubmed-1635007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16350072006-11-07 Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis Meneghini, R Michael Hallab, Nadim J Berger, Richard A Jacobs, Joshua J Paprosky, Wayne G Rosenberg, Aaron G J Orthop Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-four cadaveric femoral specimens were implanted with a fully porous-coated stem. Two different diameters were tested and the stems were implanted at multiple contact lengths without proximal bone support. Each specimen underwent torsional testing to failure and rotational micromotion was measured at the implant-bone interface. RESULTS: The larger stem diameter demonstrated a greater torsional stability for a given length of cortical contact (p ≤ 0.05). Decreasing length of diaphyseal contact length was associated with less torsional stability. Torsional resistance was inconsistent at 2 cm of depth. CONCLUSION: Larger stem diameters frequently used in revisions may be associated with less diaphyseal contact length to achieve equivalent rotational stability compared to smaller diameter stems. Furthermore, a minimum of 3 cm or 4 cm of diaphyseal contact with a porous-coated stem should be achieved in proximal femoral bone deficiency and will likely be dependent on the stem diameter utilized at the time of surgery. BioMed Central 2006-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1635007/ /pubmed/17150125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-1-5 Text en Copyright © 2006 Meneghini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meneghini, R Michael
Hallab, Nadim J
Berger, Richard A
Jacobs, Joshua J
Paprosky, Wayne G
Rosenberg, Aaron G
Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_full Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_fullStr Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_short Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
title_sort stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17150125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-1-5
work_keys_str_mv AT meneghinirmichael stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT hallabnadimj stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT bergerricharda stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT jacobsjoshuaj stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT paproskywayneg stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis
AT rosenbergaarong stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis