Cargando…
Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis
BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17150125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-1-5 |
_version_ | 1782130659078176768 |
---|---|
author | Meneghini, R Michael Hallab, Nadim J Berger, Richard A Jacobs, Joshua J Paprosky, Wayne G Rosenberg, Aaron G |
author_facet | Meneghini, R Michael Hallab, Nadim J Berger, Richard A Jacobs, Joshua J Paprosky, Wayne G Rosenberg, Aaron G |
author_sort | Meneghini, R Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-four cadaveric femoral specimens were implanted with a fully porous-coated stem. Two different diameters were tested and the stems were implanted at multiple contact lengths without proximal bone support. Each specimen underwent torsional testing to failure and rotational micromotion was measured at the implant-bone interface. RESULTS: The larger stem diameter demonstrated a greater torsional stability for a given length of cortical contact (p ≤ 0.05). Decreasing length of diaphyseal contact length was associated with less torsional stability. Torsional resistance was inconsistent at 2 cm of depth. CONCLUSION: Larger stem diameters frequently used in revisions may be associated with less diaphyseal contact length to achieve equivalent rotational stability compared to smaller diameter stems. Furthermore, a minimum of 3 cm or 4 cm of diaphyseal contact with a porous-coated stem should be achieved in proximal femoral bone deficiency and will likely be dependent on the stem diameter utilized at the time of surgery. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1635007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16350072006-11-07 Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis Meneghini, R Michael Hallab, Nadim J Berger, Richard A Jacobs, Joshua J Paprosky, Wayne G Rosenberg, Aaron G J Orthop Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty often requires bypassing the deficient metaphyseal bone to obtain distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of stem diameter and length of diaphyseal contact in achieving rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-four cadaveric femoral specimens were implanted with a fully porous-coated stem. Two different diameters were tested and the stems were implanted at multiple contact lengths without proximal bone support. Each specimen underwent torsional testing to failure and rotational micromotion was measured at the implant-bone interface. RESULTS: The larger stem diameter demonstrated a greater torsional stability for a given length of cortical contact (p ≤ 0.05). Decreasing length of diaphyseal contact length was associated with less torsional stability. Torsional resistance was inconsistent at 2 cm of depth. CONCLUSION: Larger stem diameters frequently used in revisions may be associated with less diaphyseal contact length to achieve equivalent rotational stability compared to smaller diameter stems. Furthermore, a minimum of 3 cm or 4 cm of diaphyseal contact with a porous-coated stem should be achieved in proximal femoral bone deficiency and will likely be dependent on the stem diameter utilized at the time of surgery. BioMed Central 2006-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1635007/ /pubmed/17150125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-1-5 Text en Copyright © 2006 Meneghini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meneghini, R Michael Hallab, Nadim J Berger, Richard A Jacobs, Joshua J Paprosky, Wayne G Rosenberg, Aaron G Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
title | Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
title_full | Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
title_fullStr | Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
title_short | Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
title_sort | stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17150125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-1-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meneghinirmichael stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis AT hallabnadimj stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis AT bergerricharda stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis AT jacobsjoshuaj stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis AT paproskywayneg stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis AT rosenbergaarong stemdiameterandrotationalstabilityinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyabiomechanicalanalysis |