Cargando…

Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice

BACKGROUND: Few patients with lower bowel symptoms who consult their general practitioner need a specialist opinion. However data from referred patients suggest that those who are referred would benefit from detailed assessment before referral. METHODS: A cluster randomised factorial trial. 44 gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiwa, Moyez, Skinner, Paul, Coker, Akinoso Olujimi, Shaw, Lindsey, Campbell, Michael J, Thompson, Joanne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17078894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-65
_version_ 1782130664494071808
author Jiwa, Moyez
Skinner, Paul
Coker, Akinoso Olujimi
Shaw, Lindsey
Campbell, Michael J
Thompson, Joanne
author_facet Jiwa, Moyez
Skinner, Paul
Coker, Akinoso Olujimi
Shaw, Lindsey
Campbell, Michael J
Thompson, Joanne
author_sort Jiwa, Moyez
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few patients with lower bowel symptoms who consult their general practitioner need a specialist opinion. However data from referred patients suggest that those who are referred would benefit from detailed assessment before referral. METHODS: A cluster randomised factorial trial. 44 general practices in North Trent, UK. Practices were offered either an electronic interactive referral pro forma, an educational outreach visit by a local colorectal surgeon, both or neither. The main outcome measure was the proportion of cases with severe diverticular disease, cancer or precancerous lesions and inflammatory bowel disease in those referred by each group. A secondary outcome was a referral letter quality score. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify key themes relating to the use of the software RESULTS: From 150 invitations, 44 practices were recruited with a total list size of 265,707. There were 716 consecutive referrals recorded over a six-month period, for which a diagnosis was available for 514. In the combined software arms 14% (37/261) had significant pathology, compared with 19% (49/253) in the non-software arms, relative risk 0.73 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.15). In the combined educational outreach arms 15% (38/258) had significant pathology compared with 19% (48/256) in the non-educational arms, relative risk 0.79 (95% CI: 0.50 to 1.24). Pro forma practices documented better assessment of patients at referral. CONCLUSION: There was a lack of evidence that either intervention increased the proportion of patients with organic pathology among those referred. The interactive software did improve the amount of information relayed in referral letters although we were unable to confirm if this made a significant difference to patients or their health care providers. The potential value of either intervention may have been diminished by their limited uptake within the context of a cluster randomised clinical trial. A number of lessons were learned in this trial of novel innovations.
format Text
id pubmed-1635053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16350532006-11-08 Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice Jiwa, Moyez Skinner, Paul Coker, Akinoso Olujimi Shaw, Lindsey Campbell, Michael J Thompson, Joanne BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Few patients with lower bowel symptoms who consult their general practitioner need a specialist opinion. However data from referred patients suggest that those who are referred would benefit from detailed assessment before referral. METHODS: A cluster randomised factorial trial. 44 general practices in North Trent, UK. Practices were offered either an electronic interactive referral pro forma, an educational outreach visit by a local colorectal surgeon, both or neither. The main outcome measure was the proportion of cases with severe diverticular disease, cancer or precancerous lesions and inflammatory bowel disease in those referred by each group. A secondary outcome was a referral letter quality score. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify key themes relating to the use of the software RESULTS: From 150 invitations, 44 practices were recruited with a total list size of 265,707. There were 716 consecutive referrals recorded over a six-month period, for which a diagnosis was available for 514. In the combined software arms 14% (37/261) had significant pathology, compared with 19% (49/253) in the non-software arms, relative risk 0.73 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.15). In the combined educational outreach arms 15% (38/258) had significant pathology compared with 19% (48/256) in the non-educational arms, relative risk 0.79 (95% CI: 0.50 to 1.24). Pro forma practices documented better assessment of patients at referral. CONCLUSION: There was a lack of evidence that either intervention increased the proportion of patients with organic pathology among those referred. The interactive software did improve the amount of information relayed in referral letters although we were unable to confirm if this made a significant difference to patients or their health care providers. The potential value of either intervention may have been diminished by their limited uptake within the context of a cluster randomised clinical trial. A number of lessons were learned in this trial of novel innovations. BioMed Central 2006-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC1635053/ /pubmed/17078894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-65 Text en Copyright © 2006 Jiwa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jiwa, Moyez
Skinner, Paul
Coker, Akinoso Olujimi
Shaw, Lindsey
Campbell, Michael J
Thompson, Joanne
Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
title Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
title_full Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
title_fullStr Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
title_short Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
title_sort implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17078894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-65
work_keys_str_mv AT jiwamoyez implementingreferralguidelineslessonsfromanegativeoutcomeclusterrandomisedfactorialtrialingeneralpractice
AT skinnerpaul implementingreferralguidelineslessonsfromanegativeoutcomeclusterrandomisedfactorialtrialingeneralpractice
AT cokerakinosoolujimi implementingreferralguidelineslessonsfromanegativeoutcomeclusterrandomisedfactorialtrialingeneralpractice
AT shawlindsey implementingreferralguidelineslessonsfromanegativeoutcomeclusterrandomisedfactorialtrialingeneralpractice
AT campbellmichaelj implementingreferralguidelineslessonsfromanegativeoutcomeclusterrandomisedfactorialtrialingeneralpractice
AT thompsonjoanne implementingreferralguidelineslessonsfromanegativeoutcomeclusterrandomisedfactorialtrialingeneralpractice