Cargando…

Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling

The identification of pseudogenes is an integral and significant part of the genome annotation because of their abundance and their impact on the experimental analysis of functional genes. Most of the computational annotation systems are not optimized for systematic pseudogene recognition, often ann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Alison, Charlab, Rosane, Li, Peter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1636364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16945953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl591
_version_ 1782130739328843776
author Yao, Alison
Charlab, Rosane
Li, Peter
author_facet Yao, Alison
Charlab, Rosane
Li, Peter
author_sort Yao, Alison
collection PubMed
description The identification of pseudogenes is an integral and significant part of the genome annotation because of their abundance and their impact on the experimental analysis of functional genes. Most of the computational annotation systems are not optimized for systematic pseudogene recognition, often annotating pseudogenes as functional genes, and users then propagate these errors to subsequent analyses and interpretations. In order to validate gene annotations and to identify pseudogenes that are potentially mis-annotated, we developed a novel approach based on whole genome profiling of existing transcript and protein sequences. This method has two important features: (i) equally detects both processed and non-processed pseudogenes and (ii) can identify transcribed pseudogenes. Applying this method to the human Ensembl gene predictions, we discovered that 2011 (9% of total) Ensembl genes in the categories of known and novel might be pseudogenes based on expression evidence. Of these, 1200 genes are found to have no existing evidence of transcription, and 811 genes are found with transcription evidence but contain significant translation disruption. Approximately 40% of the 2011 identified pseudogenes presented a multi-exon structure, representing non-processed pseudogenes. We have demonstrated the power of whole genome profiling of expression sequences to improve the accuracy of gene annotations.
format Text
id pubmed-1636364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16363642006-11-29 Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling Yao, Alison Charlab, Rosane Li, Peter Nucleic Acids Res Computational Biology The identification of pseudogenes is an integral and significant part of the genome annotation because of their abundance and their impact on the experimental analysis of functional genes. Most of the computational annotation systems are not optimized for systematic pseudogene recognition, often annotating pseudogenes as functional genes, and users then propagate these errors to subsequent analyses and interpretations. In order to validate gene annotations and to identify pseudogenes that are potentially mis-annotated, we developed a novel approach based on whole genome profiling of existing transcript and protein sequences. This method has two important features: (i) equally detects both processed and non-processed pseudogenes and (ii) can identify transcribed pseudogenes. Applying this method to the human Ensembl gene predictions, we discovered that 2011 (9% of total) Ensembl genes in the categories of known and novel might be pseudogenes based on expression evidence. Of these, 1200 genes are found to have no existing evidence of transcription, and 811 genes are found with transcription evidence but contain significant translation disruption. Approximately 40% of the 2011 identified pseudogenes presented a multi-exon structure, representing non-processed pseudogenes. We have demonstrated the power of whole genome profiling of expression sequences to improve the accuracy of gene annotations. Oxford University Press 2006-09 2006-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1636364/ /pubmed/16945953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl591 Text en © 2006 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Computational Biology
Yao, Alison
Charlab, Rosane
Li, Peter
Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
title Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
title_full Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
title_fullStr Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
title_full_unstemmed Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
title_short Systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
title_sort systematic identification of pseudogenes through whole genome expression evidence profiling
topic Computational Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1636364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16945953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl591
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoalison systematicidentificationofpseudogenesthroughwholegenomeexpressionevidenceprofiling
AT charlabrosane systematicidentificationofpseudogenesthroughwholegenomeexpressionevidenceprofiling
AT lipeter systematicidentificationofpseudogenesthroughwholegenomeexpressionevidenceprofiling