Cargando…

Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: PROCON was designed to assess the clinical outcome, development of adjacent disc disease and costs of cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion using a stand alone cage and implantation of a Bryan's disc prosthesis. Description of rationale and design of PROCON trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartels, Ronald HMA, Donk, Roland, van der Wilt, Gert Jan, Grotenhuis, J André, Venderink, Dick
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1637105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-85
_version_ 1782130786803122176
author Bartels, Ronald HMA
Donk, Roland
van der Wilt, Gert Jan
Grotenhuis, J André
Venderink, Dick
author_facet Bartels, Ronald HMA
Donk, Roland
van der Wilt, Gert Jan
Grotenhuis, J André
Venderink, Dick
author_sort Bartels, Ronald HMA
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: PROCON was designed to assess the clinical outcome, development of adjacent disc disease and costs of cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion using a stand alone cage and implantation of a Bryan's disc prosthesis. Description of rationale and design of PROCON trial and discussion of its strengths and limitations. METHODS/DESIGN: Since proof justifying the use of implants or arthroplasty after cervical anterior discectomy is lacking, PROCON was designed. PROCON is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion with a stand alone cage or with implantation of a disc. The study population will be enrolled from patients with a single level cervical disc disease without myelopathic signs. Each treatment arm will need 90 patients. The patients will be followed for a minimum of five years, with visits scheduled at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, and then yearly. At one year postoperatively, clinical outcome and self reported outcomes will be evaluated. At five years, the development of adjacent disc disease will be investigated. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will contribute to the discussion whether additional fusion or arthroplasty is needed and cost effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41681847
format Text
id pubmed-1637105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16371052006-11-17 Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty Bartels, Ronald HMA Donk, Roland van der Wilt, Gert Jan Grotenhuis, J André Venderink, Dick BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: PROCON was designed to assess the clinical outcome, development of adjacent disc disease and costs of cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion using a stand alone cage and implantation of a Bryan's disc prosthesis. Description of rationale and design of PROCON trial and discussion of its strengths and limitations. METHODS/DESIGN: Since proof justifying the use of implants or arthroplasty after cervical anterior discectomy is lacking, PROCON was designed. PROCON is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion with a stand alone cage or with implantation of a disc. The study population will be enrolled from patients with a single level cervical disc disease without myelopathic signs. Each treatment arm will need 90 patients. The patients will be followed for a minimum of five years, with visits scheduled at 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, and then yearly. At one year postoperatively, clinical outcome and self reported outcomes will be evaluated. At five years, the development of adjacent disc disease will be investigated. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will contribute to the discussion whether additional fusion or arthroplasty is needed and cost effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN41681847 BioMed Central 2006-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1637105/ /pubmed/17096851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-85 Text en Copyright © 2006 Bartels et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bartels, Ronald HMA
Donk, Roland
van der Wilt, Gert Jan
Grotenhuis, J André
Venderink, Dick
Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
title Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
title_full Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
title_fullStr Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
title_short Design of the PROCON trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
title_sort design of the procon trial: a prospective, randomized multi – center study comparing cervical anterior discectomy without fusion, with fusion or with arthroplasty
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1637105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-85
work_keys_str_mv AT bartelsronaldhma designoftheprocontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingcervicalanteriordiscectomywithoutfusionwithfusionorwitharthroplasty
AT donkroland designoftheprocontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingcervicalanteriordiscectomywithoutfusionwithfusionorwitharthroplasty
AT vanderwiltgertjan designoftheprocontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingcervicalanteriordiscectomywithoutfusionwithfusionorwitharthroplasty
AT grotenhuisjandre designoftheprocontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingcervicalanteriordiscectomywithoutfusionwithfusionorwitharthroplasty
AT venderinkdick designoftheprocontrialaprospectiverandomizedmulticenterstudycomparingcervicalanteriordiscectomywithoutfusionwithfusionorwitharthroplasty