Cargando…

c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?

The predictive and prognostic implication of oncogene amplification in breast cancer has received great attention in the past two decades. her-2/neu and c-myc are two oncogenes that are frequently amplified and overexpressed in breast carcinomas. Despite the extensive data on these oncogenes, their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitt, Fernando C, Reis-Filho, Jorge S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC165018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12817989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr606
_version_ 1782120818395840512
author Schmitt, Fernando C
Reis-Filho, Jorge S
author_facet Schmitt, Fernando C
Reis-Filho, Jorge S
author_sort Schmitt, Fernando C
collection PubMed
description The predictive and prognostic implication of oncogene amplification in breast cancer has received great attention in the past two decades. her-2/neu and c-myc are two oncogenes that are frequently amplified and overexpressed in breast carcinomas. Despite the extensive data on these oncogenes, their prognostic and predictive impact on breast cancer patients remains controversial. Schlotter and colleagues have recently suggested that c-myc, and not her-2/neu, could predict the recurrence and mortality of patients with node-negative breast carcinomas. Regardless of the promising results, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of data from studies assessing gene amplification without in situ analysis. We address the novelty, accuracy and clinical significance of the study by Schlotter and colleagues.
format Text
id pubmed-165018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1650182003-07-12 c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant? Schmitt, Fernando C Reis-Filho, Jorge S Breast Cancer Res Commentary The predictive and prognostic implication of oncogene amplification in breast cancer has received great attention in the past two decades. her-2/neu and c-myc are two oncogenes that are frequently amplified and overexpressed in breast carcinomas. Despite the extensive data on these oncogenes, their prognostic and predictive impact on breast cancer patients remains controversial. Schlotter and colleagues have recently suggested that c-myc, and not her-2/neu, could predict the recurrence and mortality of patients with node-negative breast carcinomas. Regardless of the promising results, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of data from studies assessing gene amplification without in situ analysis. We address the novelty, accuracy and clinical significance of the study by Schlotter and colleagues. BioMed Central 2003 2003-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC165018/ /pubmed/12817989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr606 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Schmitt, Fernando C
Reis-Filho, Jorge S
c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
title c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
title_full c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
title_fullStr c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
title_full_unstemmed c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
title_short c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
title_sort c-myc, not her-2/neu, can predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients: how novel, how accurate, and how significant?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC165018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12817989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr606
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittfernandoc cmycnother2neucanpredicttheprognosisofbreastcancerpatientshownovelhowaccurateandhowsignificant
AT reisfilhojorges cmycnother2neucanpredicttheprognosisofbreastcancerpatientshownovelhowaccurateandhowsignificant