Cargando…

Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics

BACKGROUND: The collection of ethnicity information as part of cancer datasets is important for planning services and ensuring equal access, and for epidemiological studies. However, ethnicity has generally not been well recorded in cancer registries in the UK. The aim of this study was to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jack, Ruth H, Linklater, Karen M, Hofman, David, Fitzpatrick, Justine, Møller, Henrik
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1657017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-281
_version_ 1782131021427245056
author Jack, Ruth H
Linklater, Karen M
Hofman, David
Fitzpatrick, Justine
Møller, Henrik
author_facet Jack, Ruth H
Linklater, Karen M
Hofman, David
Fitzpatrick, Justine
Møller, Henrik
author_sort Jack, Ruth H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The collection of ethnicity information as part of cancer datasets is important for planning services and ensuring equal access, and for epidemiological studies. However, ethnicity has generally not been well recorded in cancer registries in the UK. The aim of this study was to determine the completeness of ethnicity coding in the Thames Cancer Registry (TCR) database and within the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data as held by the London Health Observatory, and to investigate factors associated with ethnicity being recorded. METHODS: Records for 111821 hospital admissions of London residents with a malignant cancer as a primary diagnosis between April 2002 and March 2003 and records for 25581 London residents diagnosed with cancer in 2002 were examined. Data on sex, age, cancer network of residence, deprivation, proportion of non-whites in the local authority population, and site of cancer were available. The proportion of patients in each group with a valid ethnicity code was calculated. In the TCR data proportions were also calculated adjusted for all other variables. RESULTS: Ethnicity was recorded for 90661 (81.1%) of the hospital admissions in the HES data and 5796 (22.7%) patients on the TCR database. Patients resident in areas with a higher proportion of non-white residents and the most deprived populations were more likely to have an ethnic code on the TCR database, though this pattern was not seen in the HES data. Adjustment did not materially affect the association between deprivation and ethnicity being recorded in the TCR data. CONCLUSION: There was a large difference in completeness of ethnicity between the data sources. In order to improve the level of recording in TCR data there needs to be better recording of ethnicity in sources TCR data collection staff have access to, or use of information from other sources e.g. electronic data feeds from hospitals or pathology laboratories, or HES data itself supplied directly to TCR. Efforts to collect ethnicity data should be encouraged in all healthcare settings. Future research should explore where the difficulties collecting ethnicity information lie, whether with patients, healthcare professionals or the recording procedure, and how such problems can be overcome.
format Text
id pubmed-1657017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16570172006-11-22 Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics Jack, Ruth H Linklater, Karen M Hofman, David Fitzpatrick, Justine Møller, Henrik BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The collection of ethnicity information as part of cancer datasets is important for planning services and ensuring equal access, and for epidemiological studies. However, ethnicity has generally not been well recorded in cancer registries in the UK. The aim of this study was to determine the completeness of ethnicity coding in the Thames Cancer Registry (TCR) database and within the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data as held by the London Health Observatory, and to investigate factors associated with ethnicity being recorded. METHODS: Records for 111821 hospital admissions of London residents with a malignant cancer as a primary diagnosis between April 2002 and March 2003 and records for 25581 London residents diagnosed with cancer in 2002 were examined. Data on sex, age, cancer network of residence, deprivation, proportion of non-whites in the local authority population, and site of cancer were available. The proportion of patients in each group with a valid ethnicity code was calculated. In the TCR data proportions were also calculated adjusted for all other variables. RESULTS: Ethnicity was recorded for 90661 (81.1%) of the hospital admissions in the HES data and 5796 (22.7%) patients on the TCR database. Patients resident in areas with a higher proportion of non-white residents and the most deprived populations were more likely to have an ethnic code on the TCR database, though this pattern was not seen in the HES data. Adjustment did not materially affect the association between deprivation and ethnicity being recorded in the TCR data. CONCLUSION: There was a large difference in completeness of ethnicity between the data sources. In order to improve the level of recording in TCR data there needs to be better recording of ethnicity in sources TCR data collection staff have access to, or use of information from other sources e.g. electronic data feeds from hospitals or pathology laboratories, or HES data itself supplied directly to TCR. Efforts to collect ethnicity data should be encouraged in all healthcare settings. Future research should explore where the difficulties collecting ethnicity information lie, whether with patients, healthcare professionals or the recording procedure, and how such problems can be overcome. BioMed Central 2006-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1657017/ /pubmed/17096838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-281 Text en Copyright © 2006 Jack et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jack, Ruth H
Linklater, Karen M
Hofman, David
Fitzpatrick, Justine
Møller, Henrik
Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics
title Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics
title_full Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics
title_fullStr Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics
title_full_unstemmed Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics
title_short Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics
title_sort ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in hospital episode statistics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1657017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-281
work_keys_str_mv AT jackruthh ethnicitycodinginaregionalcancerregistryandinhospitalepisodestatistics
AT linklaterkarenm ethnicitycodinginaregionalcancerregistryandinhospitalepisodestatistics
AT hofmandavid ethnicitycodinginaregionalcancerregistryandinhospitalepisodestatistics
AT fitzpatrickjustine ethnicitycodinginaregionalcancerregistryandinhospitalepisodestatistics
AT møllerhenrik ethnicitycodinginaregionalcancerregistryandinhospitalepisodestatistics