Cargando…

Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping

BACKGROUND: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allele-specific extension (Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Käller, Max, Hultin, Emilie, Holmberg, Kristina, Persson, Marie-Louise, Odeberg, Jacob, Lundeberg, Joakim, Ahmadian, Afshin
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1657021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17107626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-291
_version_ 1782131022376206336
author Käller, Max
Hultin, Emilie
Holmberg, Kristina
Persson, Marie-Louise
Odeberg, Jacob
Lundeberg, Joakim
Ahmadian, Afshin
author_facet Käller, Max
Hultin, Emilie
Holmberg, Kristina
Persson, Marie-Louise
Odeberg, Jacob
Lundeberg, Joakim
Ahmadian, Afshin
author_sort Käller, Max
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allele-specific extension (PrASE), the protease constrains the elongation reaction and thus prevents incorrect nucleotide incorporation to mismatched 3'-termini primers. RESULTS: The assay is automated for 48 genotyping reactions in parallel followed by a tag-microarray detection system. A script automatically visualizes the results in cluster diagrams and assigns the genotypes. Ten polymorphic positions suggested as prothrombotic genetic variations were analyzed with Pyrosequencing and PrASE technologies in 442 samples and 99.8 % concordance was achieved. In addition to accuracy, the robustness and reproducibility of the technique has been investigated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study strongly indicate that the PrASE technology can offer significant improvements in terms of accuracy and robustness and thereof increased number of typeable SNPs.
format Text
id pubmed-1657021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16570212006-11-22 Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping Käller, Max Hultin, Emilie Holmberg, Kristina Persson, Marie-Louise Odeberg, Jacob Lundeberg, Joakim Ahmadian, Afshin BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allele-specific extension (PrASE), the protease constrains the elongation reaction and thus prevents incorrect nucleotide incorporation to mismatched 3'-termini primers. RESULTS: The assay is automated for 48 genotyping reactions in parallel followed by a tag-microarray detection system. A script automatically visualizes the results in cluster diagrams and assigns the genotypes. Ten polymorphic positions suggested as prothrombotic genetic variations were analyzed with Pyrosequencing and PrASE technologies in 442 samples and 99.8 % concordance was achieved. In addition to accuracy, the robustness and reproducibility of the technique has been investigated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study strongly indicate that the PrASE technology can offer significant improvements in terms of accuracy and robustness and thereof increased number of typeable SNPs. BioMed Central 2006-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1657021/ /pubmed/17107626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-291 Text en Copyright © 2006 Käller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Käller, Max
Hultin, Emilie
Holmberg, Kristina
Persson, Marie-Louise
Odeberg, Jacob
Lundeberg, Joakim
Ahmadian, Afshin
Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
title Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
title_full Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
title_fullStr Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
title_short Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
title_sort comparison of prase and pyrosequencing for snp genotyping
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1657021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17107626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-291
work_keys_str_mv AT kallermax comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping
AT hultinemilie comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping
AT holmbergkristina comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping
AT perssonmarielouise comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping
AT odebergjacob comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping
AT lundebergjoakim comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping
AT ahmadianafshin comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping