Cargando…
Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping
BACKGROUND: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allele-specific extension (Pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1657021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17107626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-291 |
_version_ | 1782131022376206336 |
---|---|
author | Käller, Max Hultin, Emilie Holmberg, Kristina Persson, Marie-Louise Odeberg, Jacob Lundeberg, Joakim Ahmadian, Afshin |
author_facet | Käller, Max Hultin, Emilie Holmberg, Kristina Persson, Marie-Louise Odeberg, Jacob Lundeberg, Joakim Ahmadian, Afshin |
author_sort | Käller, Max |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allele-specific extension (PrASE), the protease constrains the elongation reaction and thus prevents incorrect nucleotide incorporation to mismatched 3'-termini primers. RESULTS: The assay is automated for 48 genotyping reactions in parallel followed by a tag-microarray detection system. A script automatically visualizes the results in cluster diagrams and assigns the genotypes. Ten polymorphic positions suggested as prothrombotic genetic variations were analyzed with Pyrosequencing and PrASE technologies in 442 samples and 99.8 % concordance was achieved. In addition to accuracy, the robustness and reproducibility of the technique has been investigated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study strongly indicate that the PrASE technology can offer significant improvements in terms of accuracy and robustness and thereof increased number of typeable SNPs. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1657021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16570212006-11-22 Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping Käller, Max Hultin, Emilie Holmberg, Kristina Persson, Marie-Louise Odeberg, Jacob Lundeberg, Joakim Ahmadian, Afshin BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: There is an imperative need for SNP genotyping technologies that are cost-effective per sample with retained high accuracy, throughput and flexibility. We have developed a microarray-based technique and compared it to Pyrosequencing. In the protease-mediated allele-specific extension (PrASE), the protease constrains the elongation reaction and thus prevents incorrect nucleotide incorporation to mismatched 3'-termini primers. RESULTS: The assay is automated for 48 genotyping reactions in parallel followed by a tag-microarray detection system. A script automatically visualizes the results in cluster diagrams and assigns the genotypes. Ten polymorphic positions suggested as prothrombotic genetic variations were analyzed with Pyrosequencing and PrASE technologies in 442 samples and 99.8 % concordance was achieved. In addition to accuracy, the robustness and reproducibility of the technique has been investigated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study strongly indicate that the PrASE technology can offer significant improvements in terms of accuracy and robustness and thereof increased number of typeable SNPs. BioMed Central 2006-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1657021/ /pubmed/17107626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-291 Text en Copyright © 2006 Käller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Käller, Max Hultin, Emilie Holmberg, Kristina Persson, Marie-Louise Odeberg, Jacob Lundeberg, Joakim Ahmadian, Afshin Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping |
title | Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping |
title_full | Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping |
title_fullStr | Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping |
title_short | Comparison of PrASE and Pyrosequencing for SNP Genotyping |
title_sort | comparison of prase and pyrosequencing for snp genotyping |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1657021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17107626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kallermax comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping AT hultinemilie comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping AT holmbergkristina comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping AT perssonmarielouise comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping AT odebergjacob comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping AT lundebergjoakim comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping AT ahmadianafshin comparisonofpraseandpyrosequencingforsnpgenotyping |