Cargando…
Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL). METHODS: In total, 53 kidney tran...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1660533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17109746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-7-17 |
_version_ | 1782131034183172096 |
---|---|
author | Stavem, Knut Ganss, Rüdiger |
author_facet | Stavem, Knut Ganss, Rüdiger |
author_sort | Stavem, Knut |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL). METHODS: In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including the ESRD-SCL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability with 2 weeks between assessments. Construct validity was assessed by correlations of the ESRD-SCL subscales with related and unrelated SF-36 scales, demographic, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Subscales of the ESRD-SCL showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.72–0.81) and for the aggregate total scale α was 0.94. Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. The pattern of correlations of the ESRD-SCL scales with related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales and demographic and clinical characteristics gave support to the construct validity of the ESRD-SCL. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian translation of the ESRD-SCL showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, at the level of the original German version. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1660533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16605332006-11-23 Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients Stavem, Knut Ganss, Rüdiger BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to validate the Norwegian version of a self-administered 43-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life in kidney transplant recipients, the End-Stage Renal Disease Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module (ESRD-SCL). METHODS: In total, 53 kidney transplant recipients from one university-affiliated hospital responded to a questionnaire including the ESRD-SCL and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). We assessed internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability with 2 weeks between assessments. Construct validity was assessed by correlations of the ESRD-SCL subscales with related and unrelated SF-36 scales, demographic, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Subscales of the ESRD-SCL showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's = 0.72–0.81) and for the aggregate total scale α was 0.94. Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficients ranging from 0.87 to 0.95. The pattern of correlations of the ESRD-SCL scales with related and unrelated scales SF-36 scales and demographic and clinical characteristics gave support to the construct validity of the ESRD-SCL. CONCLUSION: The Norwegian translation of the ESRD-SCL showed satisfactory internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability and construct validity, at the level of the original German version. BioMed Central 2006-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1660533/ /pubmed/17109746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-7-17 Text en Copyright © 2006 Stavem and Ganss; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Stavem, Knut Ganss, Rüdiger Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title | Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_full | Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_short | Reliability and validity of the ESRD Symptom Checklist – Transplantation Module in Norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the esrd symptom checklist – transplantation module in norwegian kidney transplant recipients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1660533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17109746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-7-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stavemknut reliabilityandvalidityoftheesrdsymptomchecklisttransplantationmoduleinnorwegiankidneytransplantrecipients AT ganssrudiger reliabilityandvalidityoftheesrdsymptomchecklisttransplantationmoduleinnorwegiankidneytransplantrecipients |