Cargando…
Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
BACKGROUND: To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population. METHODS: The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the di...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1660574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-87 |
_version_ | 1782131043657056256 |
---|---|
author | Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N Terwee, Caroline B Stalman, Wim AB van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM |
author_facet | Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N Terwee, Caroline B Stalman, Wim AB van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM |
author_sort | Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population. METHODS: The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the diagnosis and prognosis of hand and wrist problems completed the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 twice within 1 to 2 weeks. The data were used to assess test-retest reliability (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC, based on the standard error of measurement (SEM)). To assess responsiveness, changes in scores between baseline and the 3 month follow-up were related to an external criterion to estimate the minimal important change (MIC). We calculated the group size needed to detect the MIC beyond measurement error. RESULTS: The ICC for the Symptom Severity Scale was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54–0.78). The SDC was 1.00 at individual level and 0.11 at group level, both on a 5-point scale. The MIC was 0.23, exceeding the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 19 for the Symptom Severity Scale. The ICC for the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47–0.74). The SDC was 3.80 at individual level and 0.42 at group level, both on an 11-point scale. The MIC was 0.31, which was less than the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 150. CONCLUSION: In our heterogeneous primary care population the Symptom Severity Scale was found to be a suitable instrument to assess the severity of symptoms, whereas the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was less suitable for the measurement of physical functioning in patients with hand and wrist problems. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1660574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16605742006-11-24 Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N Terwee, Caroline B Stalman, Wim AB van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population. METHODS: The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the diagnosis and prognosis of hand and wrist problems completed the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 twice within 1 to 2 weeks. The data were used to assess test-retest reliability (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC, based on the standard error of measurement (SEM)). To assess responsiveness, changes in scores between baseline and the 3 month follow-up were related to an external criterion to estimate the minimal important change (MIC). We calculated the group size needed to detect the MIC beyond measurement error. RESULTS: The ICC for the Symptom Severity Scale was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54–0.78). The SDC was 1.00 at individual level and 0.11 at group level, both on a 5-point scale. The MIC was 0.23, exceeding the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 19 for the Symptom Severity Scale. The ICC for the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47–0.74). The SDC was 3.80 at individual level and 0.42 at group level, both on an 11-point scale. The MIC was 0.31, which was less than the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 150. CONCLUSION: In our heterogeneous primary care population the Symptom Severity Scale was found to be a suitable instrument to assess the severity of symptoms, whereas the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was less suitable for the measurement of physical functioning in patients with hand and wrist problems. BioMed Central 2006-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1660574/ /pubmed/17096845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-87 Text en Copyright © 2006 Spies-Dorgelo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N Terwee, Caroline B Stalman, Wim AB van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
title | Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
title_full | Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
title_short | Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
title_sort | reproducibility and responsiveness of the symptom severity scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (dutch-aims2-hff) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1660574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-87 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spiesdorgelomarindan reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems AT terweecarolineb reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems AT stalmanwimab reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems AT vanderwindtdanielleawm reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems |