Cargando…

Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population. METHODS: The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N, Terwee, Caroline B, Stalman, Wim AB, van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1660574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-87
_version_ 1782131043657056256
author Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N
Terwee, Caroline B
Stalman, Wim AB
van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
author_facet Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N
Terwee, Caroline B
Stalman, Wim AB
van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
author_sort Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population. METHODS: The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the diagnosis and prognosis of hand and wrist problems completed the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 twice within 1 to 2 weeks. The data were used to assess test-retest reliability (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC, based on the standard error of measurement (SEM)). To assess responsiveness, changes in scores between baseline and the 3 month follow-up were related to an external criterion to estimate the minimal important change (MIC). We calculated the group size needed to detect the MIC beyond measurement error. RESULTS: The ICC for the Symptom Severity Scale was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54–0.78). The SDC was 1.00 at individual level and 0.11 at group level, both on a 5-point scale. The MIC was 0.23, exceeding the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 19 for the Symptom Severity Scale. The ICC for the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47–0.74). The SDC was 3.80 at individual level and 0.42 at group level, both on an 11-point scale. The MIC was 0.31, which was less than the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 150. CONCLUSION: In our heterogeneous primary care population the Symptom Severity Scale was found to be a suitable instrument to assess the severity of symptoms, whereas the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was less suitable for the measurement of physical functioning in patients with hand and wrist problems.
format Text
id pubmed-1660574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16605742006-11-24 Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N Terwee, Caroline B Stalman, Wim AB van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To determine the clinimetric properties of two questionnaires assessing symptoms (Symptom Severity Scale) and physical functioning (hand and finger function subscale of the AIMS2) in a Dutch primary care population. METHODS: The first 84 participants in a 1-year follow-up study on the diagnosis and prognosis of hand and wrist problems completed the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 twice within 1 to 2 weeks. The data were used to assess test-retest reliability (ICC) and smallest detectable change (SDC, based on the standard error of measurement (SEM)). To assess responsiveness, changes in scores between baseline and the 3 month follow-up were related to an external criterion to estimate the minimal important change (MIC). We calculated the group size needed to detect the MIC beyond measurement error. RESULTS: The ICC for the Symptom Severity Scale was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54–0.78). The SDC was 1.00 at individual level and 0.11 at group level, both on a 5-point scale. The MIC was 0.23, exceeding the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 19 for the Symptom Severity Scale. The ICC for the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.47–0.74). The SDC was 3.80 at individual level and 0.42 at group level, both on an 11-point scale. The MIC was 0.31, which was less than the SDC at group level. The group size required to detect a MIC beyond measurement error was 150. CONCLUSION: In our heterogeneous primary care population the Symptom Severity Scale was found to be a suitable instrument to assess the severity of symptoms, whereas the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch-AIMS2 was less suitable for the measurement of physical functioning in patients with hand and wrist problems. BioMed Central 2006-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1660574/ /pubmed/17096845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-87 Text en Copyright © 2006 Spies-Dorgelo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Spies-Dorgelo, Marinda N
Terwee, Caroline B
Stalman, Wim AB
van der Windt, Daniëlle AWM
Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
title Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
title_full Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
title_fullStr Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
title_short Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Symptom Severity Scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (Dutch-AIMS2-HFF) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
title_sort reproducibility and responsiveness of the symptom severity scale and the hand and finger function subscale of the dutch arthritis impact measurement scales (dutch-aims2-hff) in primary care patients with wrist or hand problems
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1660574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-87
work_keys_str_mv AT spiesdorgelomarindan reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems
AT terweecarolineb reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems
AT stalmanwimab reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems
AT vanderwindtdanielleawm reproducibilityandresponsivenessofthesymptomseverityscaleandthehandandfingerfunctionsubscaleofthedutcharthritisimpactmeasurementscalesdutchaims2hffinprimarycarepatientswithwristorhandproblems