Cargando…

Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of intravenous (IV) antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in emergency departments, the practice patterns in seven emergency departments serving the adult residents of one Canadian city were observed. METHODS: An observational study of nonhosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrie, Anita G, Marrie, Thomas J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18360543
_version_ 1782131049604579328
author Carrie, Anita G
Marrie, Thomas J
author_facet Carrie, Anita G
Marrie, Thomas J
author_sort Carrie, Anita G
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of intravenous (IV) antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in emergency departments, the practice patterns in seven emergency departments serving the adult residents of one Canadian city were observed. METHODS: An observational study of nonhospitalized adults diagnosed with CAP in seven emergency departments was conducted between November 15, 2000, and November 19, 2002. Data related to antibiotic treatment of CAP administered in the emergency department and patient-specific characteristics potentially predictive of IV treatment were collected. RESULTS: A total of 3512 subjects were identified, of which 4.9% received treatment with IV antibiotics. Cefuroxime and levofloxacin were the most commonly used IV agents, while orally-treated subjects primarily received a macrolide or levofloxacin. The proportion of subjects receiving IV antibiotics differed significantly among the seven sites: 1.4%–10.6% (p > 0.0001). Logistic regression identified a number of independent predictors of receipt of IV antibiotics including risk class, temperature, respiratory rate, study year, presence of vomiting, prior antibiotic treatment, and personal care home residence. However, these predictors did not explain intersite differences. CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of patients (4.9%) presenting to the emergency department with CAP received IV antibiotics. While patient demographics and severity indicators influenced the likelihood of receipt of IV antibiotics, considerable intersite variation existed, despite adjustment for such factors.
format Text
id pubmed-1661611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16616112008-03-21 Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department Carrie, Anita G Marrie, Thomas J Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of intravenous (IV) antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in emergency departments, the practice patterns in seven emergency departments serving the adult residents of one Canadian city were observed. METHODS: An observational study of nonhospitalized adults diagnosed with CAP in seven emergency departments was conducted between November 15, 2000, and November 19, 2002. Data related to antibiotic treatment of CAP administered in the emergency department and patient-specific characteristics potentially predictive of IV treatment were collected. RESULTS: A total of 3512 subjects were identified, of which 4.9% received treatment with IV antibiotics. Cefuroxime and levofloxacin were the most commonly used IV agents, while orally-treated subjects primarily received a macrolide or levofloxacin. The proportion of subjects receiving IV antibiotics differed significantly among the seven sites: 1.4%–10.6% (p > 0.0001). Logistic regression identified a number of independent predictors of receipt of IV antibiotics including risk class, temperature, respiratory rate, study year, presence of vomiting, prior antibiotic treatment, and personal care home residence. However, these predictors did not explain intersite differences. CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of patients (4.9%) presenting to the emergency department with CAP received IV antibiotics. While patient demographics and severity indicators influenced the likelihood of receipt of IV antibiotics, considerable intersite variation existed, despite adjustment for such factors. Dove Medical Press 2005-03 2005-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1661611/ /pubmed/18360543 Text en © 2005 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved
spellingShingle Original Research
Carrie, Anita G
Marrie, Thomas J
Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
title Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
title_full Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
title_fullStr Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
title_short Use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
title_sort use of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18360543
work_keys_str_mv AT carrieanitag useofintravenousantibioticsforthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaintheemergencydepartment
AT marriethomasj useofintravenousantibioticsforthetreatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaintheemergencydepartment