Cargando…

Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology

Positron emission tomography (PET) in uro-oncology has been one of the slowest areas to develop. There are problems because of the excretion of tracer through the renal tract. Its use in prostate cancer has generally being disappointing, with PET being unable to differentiate malignancy from benign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hain, S F
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: e-MED 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1665217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16154810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0001
_version_ 1782131079624261632
author Hain, S F
author_facet Hain, S F
author_sort Hain, S F
collection PubMed
description Positron emission tomography (PET) in uro-oncology has been one of the slowest areas to develop. There are problems because of the excretion of tracer through the renal tract. Its use in prostate cancer has generally being disappointing, with PET being unable to differentiate malignancy from benign prostatic hypertrophy. In more advanced disease and in the search for the site of recurrence, PET can be of more use. Also, new tracers may prove to be more effective. PET has been shown to be of value in testicular cancer, particularly in defining recurrent disease in residual masses and in patients with raised markers. There is a clear place for PET in some of these cases. Early studies at staging are promising but more work is required to define its exact place. In renal and bladder cancer, PET may be a useful adjunct to conventional imaging in difficult cases and may assist in local staging. In all tumours it is valuable to differentiate fibrosis from recurrent disease in the treatment bed, an area of difficulty for CT/MR.
format Text
id pubmed-1665217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher e-MED
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16652172006-12-14 Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology Hain, S F Cancer Imaging Article Positron emission tomography (PET) in uro-oncology has been one of the slowest areas to develop. There are problems because of the excretion of tracer through the renal tract. Its use in prostate cancer has generally being disappointing, with PET being unable to differentiate malignancy from benign prostatic hypertrophy. In more advanced disease and in the search for the site of recurrence, PET can be of more use. Also, new tracers may prove to be more effective. PET has been shown to be of value in testicular cancer, particularly in defining recurrent disease in residual masses and in patients with raised markers. There is a clear place for PET in some of these cases. Early studies at staging are promising but more work is required to define its exact place. In renal and bladder cancer, PET may be a useful adjunct to conventional imaging in difficult cases and may assist in local staging. In all tumours it is valuable to differentiate fibrosis from recurrent disease in the treatment bed, an area of difficulty for CT/MR. e-MED 2005-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC1665217/ /pubmed/16154810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0001 Text en Copyright © 2005 International Cancer Imaging Society
spellingShingle Article
Hain, S F
Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
title Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
title_full Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
title_fullStr Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
title_full_unstemmed Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
title_short Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
title_sort positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1665217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16154810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0001
work_keys_str_mv AT hainsf positronemissiontomographyinurooncology