Cargando…

Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare uterine cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements employing two probes of different sizes, and to employ a finite element model to predict and compare the fraction of electrical current derived from subepithelial stromal tissue. METHODS: Cervical impeda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gandhi, Saurabh V, Walker, Dawn C, Brown, Brian H, Anumba, Dilly OC
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1684260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17125510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-62
_version_ 1782131178206134272
author Gandhi, Saurabh V
Walker, Dawn C
Brown, Brian H
Anumba, Dilly OC
author_facet Gandhi, Saurabh V
Walker, Dawn C
Brown, Brian H
Anumba, Dilly OC
author_sort Gandhi, Saurabh V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to compare uterine cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements employing two probes of different sizes, and to employ a finite element model to predict and compare the fraction of electrical current derived from subepithelial stromal tissue. METHODS: Cervical impedance was measured in 12 subjects during early pregnancy using 2 different sizes of the probes on each subject. RESULTS: Mean cervical resistivity was significantly higher (5.4 vs. 2.8 Ωm; p < 0.001) with the smaller probe in the frequency rage of 4–819 kHz. There was no difference in the short-term intra-observer variability between the two probes. The cervical impedance measurements derived in vivo followed the pattern predicted by the finite element model. CONCLUSION: Inter-electrode distance on the probes for measuring cervical impedance influences the tissue resistivity values obtained. Determining the appropriate probe size is necessary when conducting clinical studies of resistivity of the cervix and other human tissues.
format Text
id pubmed-1684260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16842602006-12-06 Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes Gandhi, Saurabh V Walker, Dawn C Brown, Brian H Anumba, Dilly OC Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: We sought to compare uterine cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements employing two probes of different sizes, and to employ a finite element model to predict and compare the fraction of electrical current derived from subepithelial stromal tissue. METHODS: Cervical impedance was measured in 12 subjects during early pregnancy using 2 different sizes of the probes on each subject. RESULTS: Mean cervical resistivity was significantly higher (5.4 vs. 2.8 Ωm; p < 0.001) with the smaller probe in the frequency rage of 4–819 kHz. There was no difference in the short-term intra-observer variability between the two probes. The cervical impedance measurements derived in vivo followed the pattern predicted by the finite element model. CONCLUSION: Inter-electrode distance on the probes for measuring cervical impedance influences the tissue resistivity values obtained. Determining the appropriate probe size is necessary when conducting clinical studies of resistivity of the cervix and other human tissues. BioMed Central 2006-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC1684260/ /pubmed/17125510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-62 Text en Copyright © 2006 Gandhi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gandhi, Saurabh V
Walker, Dawn C
Brown, Brian H
Anumba, Dilly OC
Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
title Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
title_full Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
title_fullStr Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
title_short Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
title_sort comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1684260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17125510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-62
work_keys_str_mv AT gandhisaurabhv comparisonofhumanuterinecervicalelectricalimpedancemeasurementsderivedusingtwotetrapolarprobesofdifferentsizes
AT walkerdawnc comparisonofhumanuterinecervicalelectricalimpedancemeasurementsderivedusingtwotetrapolarprobesofdifferentsizes
AT brownbrianh comparisonofhumanuterinecervicalelectricalimpedancemeasurementsderivedusingtwotetrapolarprobesofdifferentsizes
AT anumbadillyoc comparisonofhumanuterinecervicalelectricalimpedancemeasurementsderivedusingtwotetrapolarprobesofdifferentsizes