Cargando…

PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment

BACKGROUND: Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the progress of lymphatic filariasis elimination programs. In this study, we compared dissection of the vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess filarial infection levels in mosquit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodman, David S, Orelus, Jean-Nicolas, Roberts, Jacquelin M, Lammie, Patrick J, Streit, Thomas G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC169178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12890288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-2-11
_version_ 1782120865308082176
author Goodman, David S
Orelus, Jean-Nicolas
Roberts, Jacquelin M
Lammie, Patrick J
Streit, Thomas G
author_facet Goodman, David S
Orelus, Jean-Nicolas
Roberts, Jacquelin M
Lammie, Patrick J
Streit, Thomas G
author_sort Goodman, David S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the progress of lymphatic filariasis elimination programs. In this study, we compared dissection of the vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess filarial infection levels in mosquitoes in the context of a lymphatic filariasis elimination program in Leogane, Haiti. METHODS: Mosquitoes were collected using gravid traps located in 4 sentinel communities with Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaria prevalence that ranged from 0.8% to 15.9%. Captured mosquitoes were divided between dissection, to enumerate W. bancrofti larvae (L1, L2, L3) and desiccation for later analysis by PCR. PCR was conducted on DNA extracts from pooled mosquitoes (1–15 pooled females) utilizing a competitive PCR system with primers specific for the Ssp I repeat. PCR products were analyzed with a hybridization ELISA using probes specific for a control sequence and the Ssp I repeat. RESULTS: The prevalence of mosquito infection with W. bancrofti ranged from 0%–3.66% by dissection (L1–L3) and point estimates of infection prevalence, as assayed by PCR, ranged from 0.25% – 9.16%. Following mass treatment, W. bancrofti infection prevalence dropped significantly as determined by PCR and dissection in 2 of the 4 sentinel sites (Leogane and Barrier Jeudi, P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively). Although transmission declined in the other two sites, larval recoveries were low and these changes were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that a single round of mass treatment can have an impact on transmission of lymphatic filariasis. The use of entomologic methods as a tool to monitor filariasis programs and the statistical limitations of mosquito trapping are discussed.
format Text
id pubmed-169178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1691782003-08-06 PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment Goodman, David S Orelus, Jean-Nicolas Roberts, Jacquelin M Lammie, Patrick J Streit, Thomas G Filaria J Research BACKGROUND: Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the progress of lymphatic filariasis elimination programs. In this study, we compared dissection of the vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess filarial infection levels in mosquitoes in the context of a lymphatic filariasis elimination program in Leogane, Haiti. METHODS: Mosquitoes were collected using gravid traps located in 4 sentinel communities with Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaria prevalence that ranged from 0.8% to 15.9%. Captured mosquitoes were divided between dissection, to enumerate W. bancrofti larvae (L1, L2, L3) and desiccation for later analysis by PCR. PCR was conducted on DNA extracts from pooled mosquitoes (1–15 pooled females) utilizing a competitive PCR system with primers specific for the Ssp I repeat. PCR products were analyzed with a hybridization ELISA using probes specific for a control sequence and the Ssp I repeat. RESULTS: The prevalence of mosquito infection with W. bancrofti ranged from 0%–3.66% by dissection (L1–L3) and point estimates of infection prevalence, as assayed by PCR, ranged from 0.25% – 9.16%. Following mass treatment, W. bancrofti infection prevalence dropped significantly as determined by PCR and dissection in 2 of the 4 sentinel sites (Leogane and Barrier Jeudi, P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively). Although transmission declined in the other two sites, larval recoveries were low and these changes were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that a single round of mass treatment can have an impact on transmission of lymphatic filariasis. The use of entomologic methods as a tool to monitor filariasis programs and the statistical limitations of mosquito trapping are discussed. BioMed Central 2003-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC169178/ /pubmed/12890288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-2-11 Text en Copyright © 2003 Goodman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Goodman, David S
Orelus, Jean-Nicolas
Roberts, Jacquelin M
Lammie, Patrick J
Streit, Thomas G
PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
title PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
title_full PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
title_fullStr PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
title_full_unstemmed PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
title_short PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
title_sort pcr and mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC169178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12890288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-2-11
work_keys_str_mv AT goodmandavids pcrandmosquitodissectionastoolstomonitorfilarialinfectionlevelsfollowingmasstreatment
AT orelusjeannicolas pcrandmosquitodissectionastoolstomonitorfilarialinfectionlevelsfollowingmasstreatment
AT robertsjacquelinm pcrandmosquitodissectionastoolstomonitorfilarialinfectionlevelsfollowingmasstreatment
AT lammiepatrickj pcrandmosquitodissectionastoolstomonitorfilarialinfectionlevelsfollowingmasstreatment
AT streitthomasg pcrandmosquitodissectionastoolstomonitorfilarialinfectionlevelsfollowingmasstreatment