Cargando…

Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human

BACKGROUND: The annual James Arthur lecture series on the Evolution of the Human Brain was inaugurated at the American Museum of Natural History in 1932, through a bequest from a successful manufacturer with a particular interest in mechanisms. Karl Pribram's thirty-ninth lecture of the series,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tattersall, Ian
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17134484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-1-15
_version_ 1782131210566238208
author Tattersall, Ian
author_facet Tattersall, Ian
author_sort Tattersall, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The annual James Arthur lecture series on the Evolution of the Human Brain was inaugurated at the American Museum of Natural History in 1932, through a bequest from a successful manufacturer with a particular interest in mechanisms. Karl Pribram's thirty-ninth lecture of the series, delivered in 1970, was a seminal event that heralded much of the research agenda, since pursued by representatives of diverse disciplines, that touches on the evolution of human uniqueness. DISCUSSION: In his James Arthur lecture Pribram raised questions about the coding of information in the brain and about the complex association between language, symbol, and the unique human cognitive system. These questions are as pertinent today as in 1970. The emergence of modern human symbolic cognition is often viewed as a gradual, incremental process, governed by inexorable natural selection and propelled by the apparent advantages of increasing intelligence. However, there are numerous theoretical considerations that render such a scenario implausible, and an examination of the pattern of acquisition of behavioral and anatomical novelties in human evolution indicates that, throughout, major change was both sporadic and rare. What is more, modern bony anatomy and brain size were apparently both achieved well before we have any evidence for symbolic behavior patterns. This suggests that the biological substrate underlying the symbolic thought that is so distinctive of Homo sapiens today was exaptively achieved, long before its potential was actually put to use. In which case we need to look for the agent, perforce a cultural one, that stimulated the adoption of symbolic thought patterns. That stimulus may well have been the spontaneous invention of articulate language.
format Text
id pubmed-1693914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16939142006-12-09 Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human Tattersall, Ian J Biomed Discov Collab Focus BACKGROUND: The annual James Arthur lecture series on the Evolution of the Human Brain was inaugurated at the American Museum of Natural History in 1932, through a bequest from a successful manufacturer with a particular interest in mechanisms. Karl Pribram's thirty-ninth lecture of the series, delivered in 1970, was a seminal event that heralded much of the research agenda, since pursued by representatives of diverse disciplines, that touches on the evolution of human uniqueness. DISCUSSION: In his James Arthur lecture Pribram raised questions about the coding of information in the brain and about the complex association between language, symbol, and the unique human cognitive system. These questions are as pertinent today as in 1970. The emergence of modern human symbolic cognition is often viewed as a gradual, incremental process, governed by inexorable natural selection and propelled by the apparent advantages of increasing intelligence. However, there are numerous theoretical considerations that render such a scenario implausible, and an examination of the pattern of acquisition of behavioral and anatomical novelties in human evolution indicates that, throughout, major change was both sporadic and rare. What is more, modern bony anatomy and brain size were apparently both achieved well before we have any evidence for symbolic behavior patterns. This suggests that the biological substrate underlying the symbolic thought that is so distinctive of Homo sapiens today was exaptively achieved, long before its potential was actually put to use. In which case we need to look for the agent, perforce a cultural one, that stimulated the adoption of symbolic thought patterns. That stimulus may well have been the spontaneous invention of articulate language. BioMed Central 2006-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1693914/ /pubmed/17134484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-1-15 Text en Copyright © 2006 Tattersall; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Focus
Tattersall, Ian
Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human
title Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human
title_full Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human
title_fullStr Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human
title_full_unstemmed Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human
title_short Karl Pribram, the James Arthur Lectures, and What Makes Us Human
title_sort karl pribram, the james arthur lectures, and what makes us human
topic Focus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17134484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-1-15
work_keys_str_mv AT tattersallian karlpribramthejamesarthurlecturesandwhatmakesushuman