Cargando…

Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Wound infections are a common complication of surgery that add significantly to the morbidity of patients and costs of treatment. The global trend towards reducing length of hospital stay post-surgery and the increase in day case surgery means that surgical site infections (SSI) will inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petherick, Emily S, Dalton, Jane E, Moore, Peter J, Cullum, Nicky
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1697816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-170
_version_ 1782131223334748160
author Petherick, Emily S
Dalton, Jane E
Moore, Peter J
Cullum, Nicky
author_facet Petherick, Emily S
Dalton, Jane E
Moore, Peter J
Cullum, Nicky
author_sort Petherick, Emily S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Wound infections are a common complication of surgery that add significantly to the morbidity of patients and costs of treatment. The global trend towards reducing length of hospital stay post-surgery and the increase in day case surgery means that surgical site infections (SSI) will increasingly occur after hospital discharge. Surveillance of SSIs is important because rates of SSI are viewed as a measure of hospital performance, however accurate detection of SSIs post-hospital discharge is not straightforward. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of methods of post discharge surveillance for surgical wound infection and undertook a national audit of methods of post-discharge surveillance for surgical site infection currently used within United Kingdom NHS Trusts. RESULTS: Seven reports of six comparative studies which examined the validity of post-discharge surveillance methods were located; these involved different comparisons and some had methodological limitations, making it difficult to identify an optimal method. Several studies evaluated automated screening of electronic records and found this to be a useful strategy for the identification of SSIs that occurred post discharge. The audit identified a wide range of relevant post-discharge surveillance programmes in England, Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland; however, these programmes used varying approaches for which there is little supporting evidence of validity and/or reliability. CONCLUSION: In order to establish robust methods of surveillance for those surgical site infections that occur post discharge, there is a need to develop a method of case ascertainment that is valid and reliable post discharge. Existing research has not identified a valid and reliable method. A standardised definition of wound infection (e.g. that of the Centres for Disease Control) should be used as a basis for developing a feasible, valid and reliable approach to defining post discharge SSI. At a local level, the method used to ascertain post discharge SSI will depend upon the purpose of the surveillance, the nature of available routine data and the resources available.
format Text
id pubmed-1697816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16978162006-12-12 Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review Petherick, Emily S Dalton, Jane E Moore, Peter J Cullum, Nicky BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Wound infections are a common complication of surgery that add significantly to the morbidity of patients and costs of treatment. The global trend towards reducing length of hospital stay post-surgery and the increase in day case surgery means that surgical site infections (SSI) will increasingly occur after hospital discharge. Surveillance of SSIs is important because rates of SSI are viewed as a measure of hospital performance, however accurate detection of SSIs post-hospital discharge is not straightforward. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of methods of post discharge surveillance for surgical wound infection and undertook a national audit of methods of post-discharge surveillance for surgical site infection currently used within United Kingdom NHS Trusts. RESULTS: Seven reports of six comparative studies which examined the validity of post-discharge surveillance methods were located; these involved different comparisons and some had methodological limitations, making it difficult to identify an optimal method. Several studies evaluated automated screening of electronic records and found this to be a useful strategy for the identification of SSIs that occurred post discharge. The audit identified a wide range of relevant post-discharge surveillance programmes in England, Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland; however, these programmes used varying approaches for which there is little supporting evidence of validity and/or reliability. CONCLUSION: In order to establish robust methods of surveillance for those surgical site infections that occur post discharge, there is a need to develop a method of case ascertainment that is valid and reliable post discharge. Existing research has not identified a valid and reliable method. A standardised definition of wound infection (e.g. that of the Centres for Disease Control) should be used as a basis for developing a feasible, valid and reliable approach to defining post discharge SSI. At a local level, the method used to ascertain post discharge SSI will depend upon the purpose of the surveillance, the nature of available routine data and the resources available. BioMed Central 2006-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1697816/ /pubmed/17129368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-170 Text en Copyright © 2006 Petherick et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petherick, Emily S
Dalton, Jane E
Moore, Peter J
Cullum, Nicky
Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
title Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
title_full Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
title_fullStr Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
title_short Methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
title_sort methods for identifying surgical wound infection after discharge from hospital: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1697816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-170
work_keys_str_mv AT petherickemilys methodsforidentifyingsurgicalwoundinfectionafterdischargefromhospitalasystematicreview
AT daltonjanee methodsforidentifyingsurgicalwoundinfectionafterdischargefromhospitalasystematicreview
AT moorepeterj methodsforidentifyingsurgicalwoundinfectionafterdischargefromhospitalasystematicreview
AT cullumnicky methodsforidentifyingsurgicalwoundinfectionafterdischargefromhospitalasystematicreview