Cargando…

Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?

Background. Transfection efficacy after nonviral gene transfer in primary epithelial cells is limited. The aim of this study was to compare transfection efficacy of the recently available method of nucleofection with the established transfection reagent FuGENE6. Methods. Primary human keratinocytes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobsen, Frank, Mertens-Rill, Janine, Beller, Juergen, Hirsch, Tobias, Daigeler, Adrien, Langer, Stefan, Lehnhardt, Marcus, Steinau, Hans-Ulrich, Steinstraesser, Lars
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/26060
_version_ 1782131228237889536
author Jacobsen, Frank
Mertens-Rill, Janine
Beller, Juergen
Hirsch, Tobias
Daigeler, Adrien
Langer, Stefan
Lehnhardt, Marcus
Steinau, Hans-Ulrich
Steinstraesser, Lars
author_facet Jacobsen, Frank
Mertens-Rill, Janine
Beller, Juergen
Hirsch, Tobias
Daigeler, Adrien
Langer, Stefan
Lehnhardt, Marcus
Steinau, Hans-Ulrich
Steinstraesser, Lars
author_sort Jacobsen, Frank
collection PubMed
description Background. Transfection efficacy after nonviral gene transfer in primary epithelial cells is limited. The aim of this study was to compare transfection efficacy of the recently available method of nucleofection with the established transfection reagent FuGENE6. Methods. Primary human keratinocytes (HKC), primary human fibroblasts (HFB), and a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were transfected with reporter gene construct by FuGENE6 or Amaxa Nucleofector device. At corresponding time points, β-galactosidase expression, cell proliferation (MTT-Test), transduction efficiency (X-gal staining), cell morphology, and cytotoxicity (CASY) were determined. Results. Transgene expression after nucleofection was significantly higher in HKC and HFB and detected earlier (3 h vs. 24 h) than in FuGENE6. After lipofection 80%–90% of the cells remained proliferative without any influence on cell morphology. In contrast, nucleofection led to a decrease in keratinocyte cell size, with only 20%–42% proliferative cells. Conclusion. Related to the method-dependent increase of cytotoxicity, transgene expression after nucleofection was earlier and higher than after lipofection.
format Text
id pubmed-1698260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16982602007-01-17 Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? Jacobsen, Frank Mertens-Rill, Janine Beller, Juergen Hirsch, Tobias Daigeler, Adrien Langer, Stefan Lehnhardt, Marcus Steinau, Hans-Ulrich Steinstraesser, Lars J Biomed Biotechnol Methods Report Background. Transfection efficacy after nonviral gene transfer in primary epithelial cells is limited. The aim of this study was to compare transfection efficacy of the recently available method of nucleofection with the established transfection reagent FuGENE6. Methods. Primary human keratinocytes (HKC), primary human fibroblasts (HFB), and a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were transfected with reporter gene construct by FuGENE6 or Amaxa Nucleofector device. At corresponding time points, β-galactosidase expression, cell proliferation (MTT-Test), transduction efficiency (X-gal staining), cell morphology, and cytotoxicity (CASY) were determined. Results. Transgene expression after nucleofection was significantly higher in HKC and HFB and detected earlier (3 h vs. 24 h) than in FuGENE6. After lipofection 80%–90% of the cells remained proliferative without any influence on cell morphology. In contrast, nucleofection led to a decrease in keratinocyte cell size, with only 20%–42% proliferative cells. Conclusion. Related to the method-dependent increase of cytotoxicity, transgene expression after nucleofection was earlier and higher than after lipofection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006 2006-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1698260/ /pubmed/17489014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/26060 Text en Copyright © 2006 Frank Jacobsen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Report
Jacobsen, Frank
Mertens-Rill, Janine
Beller, Juergen
Hirsch, Tobias
Daigeler, Adrien
Langer, Stefan
Lehnhardt, Marcus
Steinau, Hans-Ulrich
Steinstraesser, Lars
Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
title Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
title_full Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
title_fullStr Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
title_full_unstemmed Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
title_short Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
title_sort nucleofection: a new method for cutaneous gene transfer?
topic Methods Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/26060
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsenfrank nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT mertensrilljanine nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT bellerjuergen nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT hirschtobias nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT daigeleradrien nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT langerstefan nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT lehnhardtmarcus nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT steinauhansulrich nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer
AT steinstraesserlars nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer