Cargando…
Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer?
Background. Transfection efficacy after nonviral gene transfer in primary epithelial cells is limited. The aim of this study was to compare transfection efficacy of the recently available method of nucleofection with the established transfection reagent FuGENE6. Methods. Primary human keratinocytes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/26060 |
_version_ | 1782131228237889536 |
---|---|
author | Jacobsen, Frank Mertens-Rill, Janine Beller, Juergen Hirsch, Tobias Daigeler, Adrien Langer, Stefan Lehnhardt, Marcus Steinau, Hans-Ulrich Steinstraesser, Lars |
author_facet | Jacobsen, Frank Mertens-Rill, Janine Beller, Juergen Hirsch, Tobias Daigeler, Adrien Langer, Stefan Lehnhardt, Marcus Steinau, Hans-Ulrich Steinstraesser, Lars |
author_sort | Jacobsen, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Transfection efficacy after nonviral gene transfer in primary epithelial cells is limited. The aim of this study was to compare transfection efficacy of the recently available method of nucleofection with the established transfection reagent FuGENE6. Methods. Primary human keratinocytes (HKC), primary human fibroblasts (HFB), and a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were transfected with reporter gene construct by FuGENE6 or Amaxa Nucleofector device. At corresponding time points, β-galactosidase expression, cell proliferation (MTT-Test), transduction efficiency (X-gal staining), cell morphology, and cytotoxicity (CASY) were determined. Results. Transgene expression after nucleofection was significantly higher in HKC and HFB and detected earlier (3 h vs. 24 h) than in FuGENE6. After lipofection 80%–90% of the cells remained proliferative without any influence on cell morphology. In contrast, nucleofection led to a decrease in keratinocyte cell size, with only 20%–42% proliferative cells. Conclusion. Related to the method-dependent increase of cytotoxicity, transgene expression after nucleofection was earlier and higher than after lipofection. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1698260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-16982602007-01-17 Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? Jacobsen, Frank Mertens-Rill, Janine Beller, Juergen Hirsch, Tobias Daigeler, Adrien Langer, Stefan Lehnhardt, Marcus Steinau, Hans-Ulrich Steinstraesser, Lars J Biomed Biotechnol Methods Report Background. Transfection efficacy after nonviral gene transfer in primary epithelial cells is limited. The aim of this study was to compare transfection efficacy of the recently available method of nucleofection with the established transfection reagent FuGENE6. Methods. Primary human keratinocytes (HKC), primary human fibroblasts (HFB), and a human keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) were transfected with reporter gene construct by FuGENE6 or Amaxa Nucleofector device. At corresponding time points, β-galactosidase expression, cell proliferation (MTT-Test), transduction efficiency (X-gal staining), cell morphology, and cytotoxicity (CASY) were determined. Results. Transgene expression after nucleofection was significantly higher in HKC and HFB and detected earlier (3 h vs. 24 h) than in FuGENE6. After lipofection 80%–90% of the cells remained proliferative without any influence on cell morphology. In contrast, nucleofection led to a decrease in keratinocyte cell size, with only 20%–42% proliferative cells. Conclusion. Related to the method-dependent increase of cytotoxicity, transgene expression after nucleofection was earlier and higher than after lipofection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2006 2006-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1698260/ /pubmed/17489014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/26060 Text en Copyright © 2006 Frank Jacobsen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Report Jacobsen, Frank Mertens-Rill, Janine Beller, Juergen Hirsch, Tobias Daigeler, Adrien Langer, Stefan Lehnhardt, Marcus Steinau, Hans-Ulrich Steinstraesser, Lars Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? |
title | Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? |
title_full | Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? |
title_fullStr | Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? |
title_short | Nucleofection: A New Method for Cutaneous Gene Transfer? |
title_sort | nucleofection: a new method for cutaneous gene transfer? |
topic | Methods Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/26060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobsenfrank nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT mertensrilljanine nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT bellerjuergen nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT hirschtobias nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT daigeleradrien nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT langerstefan nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT lehnhardtmarcus nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT steinauhansulrich nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer AT steinstraesserlars nucleofectionanewmethodforcutaneousgenetransfer |