Cargando…

A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms

BACKGROUND: The development of large genomic resources has become a prerequisite to elucidate the wide-scale evolution of genomes and the molecular basis of complex traits. Linkage maps represent a first level of integration and utilization of such resources and the primary framework for molecular a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guyomard, René, Mauger, Stéphane, Tabet-Canale, Kamila, Martineau, Sylvain, Genet, Carine, Krieg, Francine, Quillet, Edwige
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17137492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-302
_version_ 1782131233600307200
author Guyomard, René
Mauger, Stéphane
Tabet-Canale, Kamila
Martineau, Sylvain
Genet, Carine
Krieg, Francine
Quillet, Edwige
author_facet Guyomard, René
Mauger, Stéphane
Tabet-Canale, Kamila
Martineau, Sylvain
Genet, Carine
Krieg, Francine
Quillet, Edwige
author_sort Guyomard, René
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of large genomic resources has become a prerequisite to elucidate the wide-scale evolution of genomes and the molecular basis of complex traits. Linkage maps represent a first level of integration and utilization of such resources and the primary framework for molecular analyses of quantitative traits. Previously published linkage maps have already outlined the main peculiarities of the rainbow trout meiosis and a correspondance between linkage groups and chromosome arms has been recently established using fluorescent in situ hybridization. The number of chromosome arms which were covered by these maps remained unknown. RESULTS: We report an updated linkage map based on segregation analysis of more than nine hundred microsatellite markers in two doubled haploid gynogenetic lines. These markers segregated into 31 linkage groups spanning an approximate total map length of 2750 cM. Centromeres were mapped for all the linkage groups using meiogenetic lines. For each of the 31 linkage groups, the meta or acrocentric structure infered from centromere mapping was identical with those recently found with fluorescent in situ hybridization results. The present map is therefore assumed to cover the 52 chromosome arms which constitute the rainbow trout karyotype. Our data confirm the occurrence of a high interference level in this species. Homeologous regions were identified in eleven linkage groups, reflecting the tetraploid nature of the salmonid genome. The data supported the assumption that gene orders are conserved between duplicated groups and that each group is located on a single chromosome arm. Overall, a high congruence with already published rainbow trout linkage maps was found for both gene syntenies and orders. CONCLUSION: This new map is likely to cover the whole set of chromosome arms and should provide a useful framework to integrate existing or forthcoming rainbow trout linkage maps and other genomic resources. Since very large numbers of EST containing microsatellite sequences are available in databases, it becomes feasible to construct high-density linkage maps localizing known genes. This will facilitate comparative mapping and, eventually, identification of candidate genes in QTL studies.
format Text
id pubmed-1698487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-16984872006-12-13 A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms Guyomard, René Mauger, Stéphane Tabet-Canale, Kamila Martineau, Sylvain Genet, Carine Krieg, Francine Quillet, Edwige BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The development of large genomic resources has become a prerequisite to elucidate the wide-scale evolution of genomes and the molecular basis of complex traits. Linkage maps represent a first level of integration and utilization of such resources and the primary framework for molecular analyses of quantitative traits. Previously published linkage maps have already outlined the main peculiarities of the rainbow trout meiosis and a correspondance between linkage groups and chromosome arms has been recently established using fluorescent in situ hybridization. The number of chromosome arms which were covered by these maps remained unknown. RESULTS: We report an updated linkage map based on segregation analysis of more than nine hundred microsatellite markers in two doubled haploid gynogenetic lines. These markers segregated into 31 linkage groups spanning an approximate total map length of 2750 cM. Centromeres were mapped for all the linkage groups using meiogenetic lines. For each of the 31 linkage groups, the meta or acrocentric structure infered from centromere mapping was identical with those recently found with fluorescent in situ hybridization results. The present map is therefore assumed to cover the 52 chromosome arms which constitute the rainbow trout karyotype. Our data confirm the occurrence of a high interference level in this species. Homeologous regions were identified in eleven linkage groups, reflecting the tetraploid nature of the salmonid genome. The data supported the assumption that gene orders are conserved between duplicated groups and that each group is located on a single chromosome arm. Overall, a high congruence with already published rainbow trout linkage maps was found for both gene syntenies and orders. CONCLUSION: This new map is likely to cover the whole set of chromosome arms and should provide a useful framework to integrate existing or forthcoming rainbow trout linkage maps and other genomic resources. Since very large numbers of EST containing microsatellite sequences are available in databases, it becomes feasible to construct high-density linkage maps localizing known genes. This will facilitate comparative mapping and, eventually, identification of candidate genes in QTL studies. BioMed Central 2006-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1698487/ /pubmed/17137492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-302 Text en Copyright © 2006 Guyomard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guyomard, René
Mauger, Stéphane
Tabet-Canale, Kamila
Martineau, Sylvain
Genet, Carine
Krieg, Francine
Quillet, Edwige
A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
title A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
title_full A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
title_fullStr A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
title_full_unstemmed A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
title_short A Type I and Type II microsatellite linkage map of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
title_sort type i and type ii microsatellite linkage map of rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss) with presumptive coverage of all chromosome arms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1698487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17137492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-302
work_keys_str_mv AT guyomardrene atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT maugerstephane atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT tabetcanalekamila atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT martineausylvain atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT genetcarine atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT kriegfrancine atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT quilletedwige atypeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT guyomardrene typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT maugerstephane typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT tabetcanalekamila typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT martineausylvain typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT genetcarine typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT kriegfrancine typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms
AT quilletedwige typeiandtypeiimicrosatellitelinkagemapofrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykisswithpresumptivecoverageofallchromosomearms