Cargando…

Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery

BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dubois, Vincent, Wittles, Nadia, Lamont, Meon, Madge, Simon, Luck, Jon
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1702365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-36
_version_ 1782131255396007936
author Dubois, Vincent
Wittles, Nadia
Lamont, Meon
Madge, Simon
Luck, Jon
author_facet Dubois, Vincent
Wittles, Nadia
Lamont, Meon
Madge, Simon
Luck, Jon
author_sort Dubois, Vincent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for the nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient). METHODS: A prospective randomised masked trial was conducted comprising 130 patients with no significant ocular history undergoing elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. 65 patients had mydriatic drops (Tropicamide 1%, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Diclofenac sodium 0.1%) instilled prior to surgery, 65 had a wick soaked in the same drop mixture placed in the inferior fornix. Horizontal pupil diameters were recorded on a millimetre scale immediately prior to surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between the two groups (p = 0.255, Student's t-test). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the mydriasis obtained with the depot system compared with conventional drop application. Use of a depot mydriatic delivery system appears to be a safe and efficient method of drug delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN78047760
format Text
id pubmed-1702365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17023652006-12-15 Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery Dubois, Vincent Wittles, Nadia Lamont, Meon Madge, Simon Luck, Jon BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for the nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient). METHODS: A prospective randomised masked trial was conducted comprising 130 patients with no significant ocular history undergoing elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. 65 patients had mydriatic drops (Tropicamide 1%, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Diclofenac sodium 0.1%) instilled prior to surgery, 65 had a wick soaked in the same drop mixture placed in the inferior fornix. Horizontal pupil diameters were recorded on a millimetre scale immediately prior to surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between the two groups (p = 0.255, Student's t-test). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the mydriasis obtained with the depot system compared with conventional drop application. Use of a depot mydriatic delivery system appears to be a safe and efficient method of drug delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN78047760 BioMed Central 2006-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1702365/ /pubmed/17129389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-36 Text en Copyright © 2006 Dubois et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dubois, Vincent
Wittles, Nadia
Lamont, Meon
Madge, Simon
Luck, Jon
Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_full Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_fullStr Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_short Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
title_sort randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1702365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-36
work_keys_str_mv AT duboisvincent randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT wittlesnadia randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT lamontmeon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT madgesimon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery
AT luckjon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery