Cargando…
Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery
BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1702365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-36 |
_version_ | 1782131255396007936 |
---|---|
author | Dubois, Vincent Wittles, Nadia Lamont, Meon Madge, Simon Luck, Jon |
author_facet | Dubois, Vincent Wittles, Nadia Lamont, Meon Madge, Simon Luck, Jon |
author_sort | Dubois, Vincent |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for the nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient). METHODS: A prospective randomised masked trial was conducted comprising 130 patients with no significant ocular history undergoing elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. 65 patients had mydriatic drops (Tropicamide 1%, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Diclofenac sodium 0.1%) instilled prior to surgery, 65 had a wick soaked in the same drop mixture placed in the inferior fornix. Horizontal pupil diameters were recorded on a millimetre scale immediately prior to surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between the two groups (p = 0.255, Student's t-test). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the mydriasis obtained with the depot system compared with conventional drop application. Use of a depot mydriatic delivery system appears to be a safe and efficient method of drug delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN78047760 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1702365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17023652006-12-15 Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery Dubois, Vincent Wittles, Nadia Lamont, Meon Madge, Simon Luck, Jon BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: A prerequisite for safe cataract surgery is an adequately dilated pupil. The authors conducted a trial to assess the efficacy (in terms of pupil diameter) of a depot method of pre-operative pupil dilatation, as compared with repeated instillations of drops (which is time-consuming for the nursing staff and uncomfortable for the patient). METHODS: A prospective randomised masked trial was conducted comprising 130 patients with no significant ocular history undergoing elective clear corneal phacoemulsification. 65 patients had mydriatic drops (Tropicamide 1%, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Diclofenac sodium 0.1%) instilled prior to surgery, 65 had a wick soaked in the same drop mixture placed in the inferior fornix. Horizontal pupil diameters were recorded on a millimetre scale immediately prior to surgery. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pupil size between the two groups (p = 0.255, Student's t-test). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the mydriasis obtained with the depot system compared with conventional drop application. Use of a depot mydriatic delivery system appears to be a safe and efficient method of drug delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN78047760 BioMed Central 2006-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1702365/ /pubmed/17129389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-36 Text en Copyright © 2006 Dubois et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dubois, Vincent Wittles, Nadia Lamont, Meon Madge, Simon Luck, Jon Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
title | Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
title_full | Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
title_short | Randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
title_sort | randomised controlled single-blind study of conventional versus depot mydriatic drug delivery prior to cataract surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1702365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-36 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duboisvincent randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery AT wittlesnadia randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery AT lamontmeon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery AT madgesimon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery AT luckjon randomisedcontrolledsingleblindstudyofconventionalversusdepotmydriaticdrugdeliverypriortocataractsurgery |