Cargando…

Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models

BACKGROUND: Resistant starch (RS) is known for potential health benefits in the human colon. To investigate these positive effects it is important to be able to predict the amount, and the structure of starch reaching the large intestine. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare two di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fässler, Caroline, Arrigoni, Eva, Venema, Koen, Hafner, Valeria, Brouns, Fred, Amadò, Renato
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Steinkopff-Verlag 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1705489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17036261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-006-0618-7
_version_ 1782131272741552128
author Fässler, Caroline
Arrigoni, Eva
Venema, Koen
Hafner, Valeria
Brouns, Fred
Amadò, Renato
author_facet Fässler, Caroline
Arrigoni, Eva
Venema, Koen
Hafner, Valeria
Brouns, Fred
Amadò, Renato
author_sort Fässler, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resistant starch (RS) is known for potential health benefits in the human colon. To investigate these positive effects it is important to be able to predict the amount, and the structure of starch reaching the large intestine. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare two different in vitro models simulating the digestibility of two RS containing preparations. METHODS: The substrates, high amylose maize (HAM) containing RS type 2, and retrograded long chain tapioca maltodextrins (RTmd) containing RS type 3 were in vitro digested using a batch and a dynamic model, respectively. Both preparations were characterized before and after digestion by using X-Ray and DSC, and by measuring their total starch, RS and protein contents. RESULTS: Using both digestion models, 60-61 g/100 g of RTmd turned out to be indigestible, which is very well in accordance with 59 g/100 g found in vivo after feeding RTmd to ileostomy patients. In contrast, dynamic and batch in vitro digestion experiments using HAM as a substrate led to 58 g/100 g and 66 g/100 g RS recovery. The degradability of HAM is more affected by differences in experimental parameters compared to RTmd. The main variations between the two in vitro digestion methods are the enzyme preparations used, incubation times and mechanical stress exerted on the substrate. However, for both preparations dynamically digested fractions led to lower amounts of analytically RS and a lower crystallinity. CONCLUSIONS: The two in vitro digestion methods used attacked the starch molecules differently, which influenced starch digestibility of HAM but not of RTmd.
format Text
id pubmed-1705489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Steinkopff-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17054892006-12-18 Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models Fässler, Caroline Arrigoni, Eva Venema, Koen Hafner, Valeria Brouns, Fred Amadò, Renato Eur J Nutr Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Resistant starch (RS) is known for potential health benefits in the human colon. To investigate these positive effects it is important to be able to predict the amount, and the structure of starch reaching the large intestine. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare two different in vitro models simulating the digestibility of two RS containing preparations. METHODS: The substrates, high amylose maize (HAM) containing RS type 2, and retrograded long chain tapioca maltodextrins (RTmd) containing RS type 3 were in vitro digested using a batch and a dynamic model, respectively. Both preparations were characterized before and after digestion by using X-Ray and DSC, and by measuring their total starch, RS and protein contents. RESULTS: Using both digestion models, 60-61 g/100 g of RTmd turned out to be indigestible, which is very well in accordance with 59 g/100 g found in vivo after feeding RTmd to ileostomy patients. In contrast, dynamic and batch in vitro digestion experiments using HAM as a substrate led to 58 g/100 g and 66 g/100 g RS recovery. The degradability of HAM is more affected by differences in experimental parameters compared to RTmd. The main variations between the two in vitro digestion methods are the enzyme preparations used, incubation times and mechanical stress exerted on the substrate. However, for both preparations dynamically digested fractions led to lower amounts of analytically RS and a lower crystallinity. CONCLUSIONS: The two in vitro digestion methods used attacked the starch molecules differently, which influenced starch digestibility of HAM but not of RTmd. Steinkopff-Verlag 2006-10-11 2006-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1705489/ /pubmed/17036261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-006-0618-7 Text en © Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 2006
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Fässler, Caroline
Arrigoni, Eva
Venema, Koen
Hafner, Valeria
Brouns, Fred
Amadò, Renato
Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
title Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
title_full Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
title_fullStr Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
title_full_unstemmed Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
title_short Digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
title_sort digestibility of resistant starch containing preparations using two in vitro models
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1705489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17036261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-006-0618-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fasslercaroline digestibilityofresistantstarchcontainingpreparationsusingtwoinvitromodels
AT arrigonieva digestibilityofresistantstarchcontainingpreparationsusingtwoinvitromodels
AT venemakoen digestibilityofresistantstarchcontainingpreparationsusingtwoinvitromodels
AT hafnervaleria digestibilityofresistantstarchcontainingpreparationsusingtwoinvitromodels
AT brounsfred digestibilityofresistantstarchcontainingpreparationsusingtwoinvitromodels
AT amadorenato digestibilityofresistantstarchcontainingpreparationsusingtwoinvitromodels