Cargando…
Combining scores from different patient reported outcome measures in meta-analyses: when is it justified?
BACKGROUND: Combining outcomes and the use of standardized effect measures such as effect size and standardized response mean across instruments allows more comprehensive meta-analyses and should avoid selection bias. However, such analysis ideally requires that the instruments correlate strongly an...
Autores principales: | Puhan, Milo A, Soesilo, Irene, Guyatt, Gordon H, Schünemann, Holger J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17156420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-94 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Internal consistency reliability is a poor predictor of responsiveness
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses – Part 1: assessing risk of bias and combining outcomes
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Self-administration and interviewer-administration of the German Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire: instrument development and assessment of validity and reliability in two randomised studies
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
por: Puhan, Milo A, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Improving the interpretation of quality of life evidence in meta-analyses: the application of minimal important difference units
por: Johnston, Bradley C, et al.
Publicado: (2010)