Cargando…

Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the over-diagnosis of malaria in clinical settings in Africa. This study assessed the impact of a training programme implemented as part of an intervention trial on diagnostic behaviour of clinicians in a rural district hospital in a low-moderate malaria t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masika, Paul M, Semarundu, Waziri J, Urassa, Raymond, Mosha, Jackline, Chandramohan, Daniel, Gosling, Roly D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17166271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-120
_version_ 1782131295125504000
author Masika, Paul M
Semarundu, Waziri J
Urassa, Raymond
Mosha, Jackline
Chandramohan, Daniel
Gosling, Roly D
author_facet Masika, Paul M
Semarundu, Waziri J
Urassa, Raymond
Mosha, Jackline
Chandramohan, Daniel
Gosling, Roly D
author_sort Masika, Paul M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the over-diagnosis of malaria in clinical settings in Africa. This study assessed the impact of a training programme implemented as part of an intervention trial on diagnostic behaviour of clinicians in a rural district hospital in a low-moderate malaria transmission setting. METHODS: From the beginning of 2005, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants (IPTi) has been conducted at the study hospital. As part of the RCT, the study team offered laboratory quality assurance, and supervision and training of paediatric ward staff using information on malaria epidemiology in the community. Data on clinical and blood slide confirmed cases of malaria from 2001 to 2005 were extracted from the hospital records. RESULTS: The proportion of blood slides positive for malaria parasites had decreased from 21% in 2001 to 7% in 2005 (p < .01). The proportion of outpatient and inpatient cases diagnosed as malaria ranged between 34% and 28% from 2001 to 2004 and this decreased substantially to 17% after the introduction of the package of training and support in 2005 (p < .01). There was no clear trend in the ratio of blood slide examined versus total diagnosis of malaria. CONCLUSION: It may be possible to change the diagnostic behaviour of clinicians by rigorous training using local malaria epidemiology data and supportive supervision.
format Text
id pubmed-1712345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17123452006-12-21 Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause Masika, Paul M Semarundu, Waziri J Urassa, Raymond Mosha, Jackline Chandramohan, Daniel Gosling, Roly D Malar J Case Study BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the over-diagnosis of malaria in clinical settings in Africa. This study assessed the impact of a training programme implemented as part of an intervention trial on diagnostic behaviour of clinicians in a rural district hospital in a low-moderate malaria transmission setting. METHODS: From the beginning of 2005, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants (IPTi) has been conducted at the study hospital. As part of the RCT, the study team offered laboratory quality assurance, and supervision and training of paediatric ward staff using information on malaria epidemiology in the community. Data on clinical and blood slide confirmed cases of malaria from 2001 to 2005 were extracted from the hospital records. RESULTS: The proportion of blood slides positive for malaria parasites had decreased from 21% in 2001 to 7% in 2005 (p < .01). The proportion of outpatient and inpatient cases diagnosed as malaria ranged between 34% and 28% from 2001 to 2004 and this decreased substantially to 17% after the introduction of the package of training and support in 2005 (p < .01). There was no clear trend in the ratio of blood slide examined versus total diagnosis of malaria. CONCLUSION: It may be possible to change the diagnostic behaviour of clinicians by rigorous training using local malaria epidemiology data and supportive supervision. BioMed Central 2006-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1712345/ /pubmed/17166271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-120 Text en Copyright © 2006 Masika et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Study
Masika, Paul M
Semarundu, Waziri J
Urassa, Raymond
Mosha, Jackline
Chandramohan, Daniel
Gosling, Roly D
Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
title Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
title_full Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
title_fullStr Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
title_full_unstemmed Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
title_short Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
title_sort over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17166271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-120
work_keys_str_mv AT masikapaulm overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause
AT semarunduwazirij overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause
AT urassaraymond overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause
AT moshajackline overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause
AT chandramohandaniel overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause
AT goslingrolyd overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause