Cargando…
Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the over-diagnosis of malaria in clinical settings in Africa. This study assessed the impact of a training programme implemented as part of an intervention trial on diagnostic behaviour of clinicians in a rural district hospital in a low-moderate malaria t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17166271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-120 |
_version_ | 1782131295125504000 |
---|---|
author | Masika, Paul M Semarundu, Waziri J Urassa, Raymond Mosha, Jackline Chandramohan, Daniel Gosling, Roly D |
author_facet | Masika, Paul M Semarundu, Waziri J Urassa, Raymond Mosha, Jackline Chandramohan, Daniel Gosling, Roly D |
author_sort | Masika, Paul M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the over-diagnosis of malaria in clinical settings in Africa. This study assessed the impact of a training programme implemented as part of an intervention trial on diagnostic behaviour of clinicians in a rural district hospital in a low-moderate malaria transmission setting. METHODS: From the beginning of 2005, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants (IPTi) has been conducted at the study hospital. As part of the RCT, the study team offered laboratory quality assurance, and supervision and training of paediatric ward staff using information on malaria epidemiology in the community. Data on clinical and blood slide confirmed cases of malaria from 2001 to 2005 were extracted from the hospital records. RESULTS: The proportion of blood slides positive for malaria parasites had decreased from 21% in 2001 to 7% in 2005 (p < .01). The proportion of outpatient and inpatient cases diagnosed as malaria ranged between 34% and 28% from 2001 to 2004 and this decreased substantially to 17% after the introduction of the package of training and support in 2005 (p < .01). There was no clear trend in the ratio of blood slide examined versus total diagnosis of malaria. CONCLUSION: It may be possible to change the diagnostic behaviour of clinicians by rigorous training using local malaria epidemiology data and supportive supervision. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1712345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17123452006-12-21 Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause Masika, Paul M Semarundu, Waziri J Urassa, Raymond Mosha, Jackline Chandramohan, Daniel Gosling, Roly D Malar J Case Study BACKGROUND: Recent studies have highlighted the over-diagnosis of malaria in clinical settings in Africa. This study assessed the impact of a training programme implemented as part of an intervention trial on diagnostic behaviour of clinicians in a rural district hospital in a low-moderate malaria transmission setting. METHODS: From the beginning of 2005, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in infants (IPTi) has been conducted at the study hospital. As part of the RCT, the study team offered laboratory quality assurance, and supervision and training of paediatric ward staff using information on malaria epidemiology in the community. Data on clinical and blood slide confirmed cases of malaria from 2001 to 2005 were extracted from the hospital records. RESULTS: The proportion of blood slides positive for malaria parasites had decreased from 21% in 2001 to 7% in 2005 (p < .01). The proportion of outpatient and inpatient cases diagnosed as malaria ranged between 34% and 28% from 2001 to 2004 and this decreased substantially to 17% after the introduction of the package of training and support in 2005 (p < .01). There was no clear trend in the ratio of blood slide examined versus total diagnosis of malaria. CONCLUSION: It may be possible to change the diagnostic behaviour of clinicians by rigorous training using local malaria epidemiology data and supportive supervision. BioMed Central 2006-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1712345/ /pubmed/17166271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-120 Text en Copyright © 2006 Masika et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Study Masika, Paul M Semarundu, Waziri J Urassa, Raymond Mosha, Jackline Chandramohan, Daniel Gosling, Roly D Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
title | Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
title_full | Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
title_fullStr | Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
title_full_unstemmed | Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
title_short | Over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
title_sort | over-diagnosis of malaria is not a lost cause |
topic | Case Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1712345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17166271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masikapaulm overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause AT semarunduwazirij overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause AT urassaraymond overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause AT moshajackline overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause AT chandramohandaniel overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause AT goslingrolyd overdiagnosisofmalariaisnotalostcause |