Cargando…
Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity
Perspectives on the classification of eukaryotic diversity have changed rapidly in recent years, as the four eukaryotic groups within the five-kingdom classification—plants, animals, fungi, and protists—have been transformed through numerous permutations into the current system of six “supergroups.”...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1713255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220 |
_version_ | 1782131311160328192 |
---|---|
author | Parfrey, Laura Wegener Barbero, Erika Lasser, Elyse Dunthorn, Micah Bhattacharya, Debashish Patterson, David J Katz, Laura A |
author_facet | Parfrey, Laura Wegener Barbero, Erika Lasser, Elyse Dunthorn, Micah Bhattacharya, Debashish Patterson, David J Katz, Laura A |
author_sort | Parfrey, Laura Wegener |
collection | PubMed |
description | Perspectives on the classification of eukaryotic diversity have changed rapidly in recent years, as the four eukaryotic groups within the five-kingdom classification—plants, animals, fungi, and protists—have been transformed through numerous permutations into the current system of six “supergroups.” The intent of the supergroup classification system is to unite microbial and macroscopic eukaryotes based on phylogenetic inference. This supergroup approach is increasing in popularity in the literature and is appearing in introductory biology textbooks. We evaluate the stability and support for the current six-supergroup classification of eukaryotes based on molecular genealogies. We assess three aspects of each supergroup: (1) the stability of its taxonomy, (2) the support for monophyly (single evolutionary origin) in molecular analyses targeting a supergroup, and (3) the support for monophyly when a supergroup is included as an out-group in phylogenetic studies targeting other taxa. Our analysis demonstrates that supergroup taxonomies are unstable and that support for groups varies tremendously, indicating that the current classification scheme of eukaryotes is likely premature. We highlight several trends contributing to the instability and discuss the requirements for establishing robust clades within the eukaryotic tree of life. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1713255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17132552006-12-27 Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity Parfrey, Laura Wegener Barbero, Erika Lasser, Elyse Dunthorn, Micah Bhattacharya, Debashish Patterson, David J Katz, Laura A PLoS Genet Research Article Perspectives on the classification of eukaryotic diversity have changed rapidly in recent years, as the four eukaryotic groups within the five-kingdom classification—plants, animals, fungi, and protists—have been transformed through numerous permutations into the current system of six “supergroups.” The intent of the supergroup classification system is to unite microbial and macroscopic eukaryotes based on phylogenetic inference. This supergroup approach is increasing in popularity in the literature and is appearing in introductory biology textbooks. We evaluate the stability and support for the current six-supergroup classification of eukaryotes based on molecular genealogies. We assess three aspects of each supergroup: (1) the stability of its taxonomy, (2) the support for monophyly (single evolutionary origin) in molecular analyses targeting a supergroup, and (3) the support for monophyly when a supergroup is included as an out-group in phylogenetic studies targeting other taxa. Our analysis demonstrates that supergroup taxonomies are unstable and that support for groups varies tremendously, indicating that the current classification scheme of eukaryotes is likely premature. We highlight several trends contributing to the instability and discuss the requirements for establishing robust clades within the eukaryotic tree of life. Public Library of Science 2006-12 2006-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1713255/ /pubmed/17194223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220 Text en © 2006 Parfrey et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parfrey, Laura Wegener Barbero, Erika Lasser, Elyse Dunthorn, Micah Bhattacharya, Debashish Patterson, David J Katz, Laura A Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity |
title | Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity |
title_full | Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity |
title_short | Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity |
title_sort | evaluating support for the current classification of eukaryotic diversity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1713255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17194223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parfreylaurawegener evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity AT barberoerika evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity AT lasserelyse evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity AT dunthornmicah evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity AT bhattacharyadebashish evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity AT pattersondavidj evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity AT katzlauraa evaluatingsupportforthecurrentclassificationofeukaryoticdiversity |