Cargando…

A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance

OBJECTIVES: To pilot using a panel of members of the public to provide preference data via the Internet METHODS: A stratified random sample of members of the general public was recruited and familiarised with the standard gamble procedure using an Internet based tool. Health states were perdiodicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stein, Ken, Dyer, Matthew, Crabb, Tania, Milne, Ruairidh, Round, Alison, Ratcliffe, Julie, Brazier, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1716763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-90
_version_ 1782131327390187520
author Stein, Ken
Dyer, Matthew
Crabb, Tania
Milne, Ruairidh
Round, Alison
Ratcliffe, Julie
Brazier, John
author_facet Stein, Ken
Dyer, Matthew
Crabb, Tania
Milne, Ruairidh
Round, Alison
Ratcliffe, Julie
Brazier, John
author_sort Stein, Ken
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To pilot using a panel of members of the public to provide preference data via the Internet METHODS: A stratified random sample of members of the general public was recruited and familiarised with the standard gamble procedure using an Internet based tool. Health states were perdiodically presented in "sets" corresponding to different conditions, during the study. The following were described: Recruitment (proportion of people approached who were trained); Participation (a) the proportion of people trained who provided any preferences and (b) the proportion of panel members who contributed to each "set" of values; and Compliance (the proportion, per participant, of preference tasks which were completed). The influence of covariates on these outcomes was investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A panel of 112 people was recruited. 23% of those approached (n = 5,320) responded to the invitation, and 24% of respondents (n = 1,215) were willing to participate (net = 5.5%). However, eventual recruitment rates, following training, were low (2.1% of those approached). Recruitment from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and among ethnic minority communities was low. Eighteen sets of health state descriptions were considered over 14 months. 74% of panel members carried out at least one valuation task. People from areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation and unmarried people were less likely to participate. An average of 41% of panel members expressed preferences on each set of descriptions. Compliance ranged from 3% to 100%. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to establish a panel of members of the general public to express preferences on a wide range of health state descriptions using the Internet, although differential recruitment and attrition are important challenges. Particular attention to recruitment and retention in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and among ethnic minority communities is necessary. Nevertheless, the panel approach to preference measurement using the Internet offers the potential to provide specific utility data in a responsive manner for use in economic evaluations and to address some of the outstanding methodological uncertainties in this field.
format Text
id pubmed-1716763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17167632006-12-23 A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance Stein, Ken Dyer, Matthew Crabb, Tania Milne, Ruairidh Round, Alison Ratcliffe, Julie Brazier, John Health Qual Life Outcomes Research OBJECTIVES: To pilot using a panel of members of the public to provide preference data via the Internet METHODS: A stratified random sample of members of the general public was recruited and familiarised with the standard gamble procedure using an Internet based tool. Health states were perdiodically presented in "sets" corresponding to different conditions, during the study. The following were described: Recruitment (proportion of people approached who were trained); Participation (a) the proportion of people trained who provided any preferences and (b) the proportion of panel members who contributed to each "set" of values; and Compliance (the proportion, per participant, of preference tasks which were completed). The influence of covariates on these outcomes was investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A panel of 112 people was recruited. 23% of those approached (n = 5,320) responded to the invitation, and 24% of respondents (n = 1,215) were willing to participate (net = 5.5%). However, eventual recruitment rates, following training, were low (2.1% of those approached). Recruitment from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and among ethnic minority communities was low. Eighteen sets of health state descriptions were considered over 14 months. 74% of panel members carried out at least one valuation task. People from areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation and unmarried people were less likely to participate. An average of 41% of panel members expressed preferences on each set of descriptions. Compliance ranged from 3% to 100%. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to establish a panel of members of the general public to express preferences on a wide range of health state descriptions using the Internet, although differential recruitment and attrition are important challenges. Particular attention to recruitment and retention in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation and among ethnic minority communities is necessary. Nevertheless, the panel approach to preference measurement using the Internet offers the potential to provide specific utility data in a responsive manner for use in economic evaluations and to address some of the outstanding methodological uncertainties in this field. BioMed Central 2006-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1716763/ /pubmed/17129380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-90 Text en Copyright © 2006 Stein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Stein, Ken
Dyer, Matthew
Crabb, Tania
Milne, Ruairidh
Round, Alison
Ratcliffe, Julie
Brazier, John
A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
title A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
title_full A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
title_fullStr A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
title_full_unstemmed A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
title_short A pilot Internet "Value of Health" Panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
title_sort pilot internet "value of health" panel: recruitment, participation and compliance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1716763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17129380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-90
work_keys_str_mv AT steinken apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT dyermatthew apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT crabbtania apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT milneruairidh apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT roundalison apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT ratcliffejulie apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT brazierjohn apilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT steinken pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT dyermatthew pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT crabbtania pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT milneruairidh pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT roundalison pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT ratcliffejulie pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance
AT brazierjohn pilotinternetvalueofhealthpanelrecruitmentparticipationandcompliance