Cargando…

SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to compare the discriminative ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) scoring systems with respect to hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zygun, David, Berthiaume, Luc, Laupland, Kevin, Kortbeek, John, Doig, Christopher
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5007
_version_ 1782131395538190336
author Zygun, David
Berthiaume, Luc
Laupland, Kevin
Kortbeek, John
Doig, Christopher
author_facet Zygun, David
Berthiaume, Luc
Laupland, Kevin
Kortbeek, John
Doig, Christopher
author_sort Zygun, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to compare the discriminative ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) scoring systems with respect to hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to the intensive care unit. METHOD: We performed a prospective cohort study at Foothills Medical Centre, the sole adult tertiary care trauma center servicing southern Alberta (population about 1.3 million). All patients aged 16 years or older with severe traumatic brain injury and intensive care unit length of stay greater than 48 hours between 1 May 2000 and 31 April 2003 were included. Non-neurologic organ dysfunction was measured using the SOFA and MODS scoring systems. Determination of organ dysfunction for each non-neurologic organ system was compared between the two systems by calculating the proportion of patients with SOFA and MOD component score defined organ failure. Consistent with previous literature, organ system failure was defined as a component score of three or greater. RESULTS: The odds of death and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with SOFA defined cardiovascular failure were 14.7 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9–36.3) and 7.6 times (95% CI 3.5–16.3) that of those without cardiovascular failure, respectively. The development of SOFA-defined cardiovascular failure was a reasonable discriminator of hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.75 and 0.73, respectively). The odds of death and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with MOD-defined cardiovascular failure were 2.6 times (95% CI 1.24–5.26) and 4.1 times (95% CI 1.3–12.4) that of those without cardiovascular failure, respectively. The development of MOD-defined cardiovascular failure was a poor discriminator of hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome (area under the ROC curve 0.57 and 0.59, respectively). Neither SOFA-defined nor MOD-defined respiratory failure was significantly associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with brain injury, the SOFA scoring system has superior discriminative ability and stronger association with outcome compared with the MOD scoring system with respect to hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome.
format Text
id pubmed-1750966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17509662006-12-27 SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study Zygun, David Berthiaume, Luc Laupland, Kevin Kortbeek, John Doig, Christopher Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The objective of the present study was to compare the discriminative ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) scoring systems with respect to hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to the intensive care unit. METHOD: We performed a prospective cohort study at Foothills Medical Centre, the sole adult tertiary care trauma center servicing southern Alberta (population about 1.3 million). All patients aged 16 years or older with severe traumatic brain injury and intensive care unit length of stay greater than 48 hours between 1 May 2000 and 31 April 2003 were included. Non-neurologic organ dysfunction was measured using the SOFA and MODS scoring systems. Determination of organ dysfunction for each non-neurologic organ system was compared between the two systems by calculating the proportion of patients with SOFA and MOD component score defined organ failure. Consistent with previous literature, organ system failure was defined as a component score of three or greater. RESULTS: The odds of death and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with SOFA defined cardiovascular failure were 14.7 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9–36.3) and 7.6 times (95% CI 3.5–16.3) that of those without cardiovascular failure, respectively. The development of SOFA-defined cardiovascular failure was a reasonable discriminator of hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.75 and 0.73, respectively). The odds of death and unfavorable neurologic outcome in patients with MOD-defined cardiovascular failure were 2.6 times (95% CI 1.24–5.26) and 4.1 times (95% CI 1.3–12.4) that of those without cardiovascular failure, respectively. The development of MOD-defined cardiovascular failure was a poor discriminator of hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome (area under the ROC curve 0.57 and 0.59, respectively). Neither SOFA-defined nor MOD-defined respiratory failure was significantly associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with brain injury, the SOFA scoring system has superior discriminative ability and stronger association with outcome compared with the MOD scoring system with respect to hospital mortality and unfavorable neurologic outcome. BioMed Central 2006 2006-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1750966/ /pubmed/16882348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5007 Text en Copyright © 2006 Zygun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zygun, David
Berthiaume, Luc
Laupland, Kevin
Kortbeek, John
Doig, Christopher
SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
title SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
title_full SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
title_fullStr SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
title_short SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
title_sort sofa is superior to mod score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882348
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5007
work_keys_str_mv AT zygundavid sofaissuperiortomodscoreforthedeterminationofnonneurologicorgandysfunctioninpatientswithseveretraumaticbraininjuryacohortstudy
AT berthiaumeluc sofaissuperiortomodscoreforthedeterminationofnonneurologicorgandysfunctioninpatientswithseveretraumaticbraininjuryacohortstudy
AT lauplandkevin sofaissuperiortomodscoreforthedeterminationofnonneurologicorgandysfunctioninpatientswithseveretraumaticbraininjuryacohortstudy
AT kortbeekjohn sofaissuperiortomodscoreforthedeterminationofnonneurologicorgandysfunctioninpatientswithseveretraumaticbraininjuryacohortstudy
AT doigchristopher sofaissuperiortomodscoreforthedeterminationofnonneurologicorgandysfunctioninpatientswithseveretraumaticbraininjuryacohortstudy