Cargando…
Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail?
The selection of patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) to receive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is challenging, partly because there are few reliable selection criteria. The study by Rana and colleagues in the previous issue of Critical Care identifies metabo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16879722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc4960 |
_version_ | 1782131400847130624 |
---|---|
author | Garpestad, Erik Hill, Nicholas S |
author_facet | Garpestad, Erik Hill, Nicholas S |
author_sort | Garpestad, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | The selection of patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) to receive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is challenging, partly because there are few reliable selection criteria. The study by Rana and colleagues in the previous issue of Critical Care identifies metabolic acidosis and a lower oxygenation index as predictors of NIV failure, although it is unable to identify threshold values. It also demonstrates that treating patients with NIV for ALI/ARDS and shock is an exercise in futility. Future studies need to focus on criteria that will enable selection of patients for whom NIV will have a high likelihood of success. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1750989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17509892006-12-27 Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? Garpestad, Erik Hill, Nicholas S Crit Care Commentary The selection of patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) to receive noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is challenging, partly because there are few reliable selection criteria. The study by Rana and colleagues in the previous issue of Critical Care identifies metabolic acidosis and a lower oxygenation index as predictors of NIV failure, although it is unable to identify threshold values. It also demonstrates that treating patients with NIV for ALI/ARDS and shock is an exercise in futility. Future studies need to focus on criteria that will enable selection of patients for whom NIV will have a high likelihood of success. BioMed Central 2006 2006-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC1750989/ /pubmed/16879722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc4960 Text en Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Garpestad, Erik Hill, Nicholas S Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
title | Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
title_full | Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
title_fullStr | Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
title_full_unstemmed | Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
title_short | Noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
title_sort | noninvasive ventilation for acute lung injury: how often should we try, how often should we fail? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16879722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc4960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garpestaderik noninvasiveventilationforacutelunginjuryhowoftenshouldwetryhowoftenshouldwefail AT hillnicholass noninvasiveventilationforacutelunginjuryhowoftenshouldwetryhowoftenshouldwefail |