Cargando…

Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?

Progress in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been slow, perhaps in part due to the heterogeneity in the biology underlying this syndrome. Open lung biopsy is a feasible approach to define various subcategories of underlying histology. In experienced hands, with careful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malhotra, Atul, Patel, Sanjay
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16941755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5001
_version_ 1782131402724081664
author Malhotra, Atul
Patel, Sanjay
author_facet Malhotra, Atul
Patel, Sanjay
author_sort Malhotra, Atul
collection PubMed
description Progress in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been slow, perhaps in part due to the heterogeneity in the biology underlying this syndrome. Open lung biopsy is a feasible approach to define various subcategories of underlying histology. In experienced hands, with careful selection of patients and close attention to details of critical care management, including mechanical ventilator settings, the procedure is safe even in patients with severe disease. However, further work is needed to define which patients, if any, experience a beneficial effect on outcome from this procedure. More research is needed on assessing efficacy of potential therapies within histologically defined subgroups. In the future, various biomarkers may be available to non-invasively classify ARDS patients from the standpoint of responsiveness to various therapies, such as gluco-corticoids.
format Text
id pubmed-1750997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17509972006-12-27 Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? Malhotra, Atul Patel, Sanjay Crit Care Commentary Progress in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been slow, perhaps in part due to the heterogeneity in the biology underlying this syndrome. Open lung biopsy is a feasible approach to define various subcategories of underlying histology. In experienced hands, with careful selection of patients and close attention to details of critical care management, including mechanical ventilator settings, the procedure is safe even in patients with severe disease. However, further work is needed to define which patients, if any, experience a beneficial effect on outcome from this procedure. More research is needed on assessing efficacy of potential therapies within histologically defined subgroups. In the future, various biomarkers may be available to non-invasively classify ARDS patients from the standpoint of responsiveness to various therapies, such as gluco-corticoids. BioMed Central 2006 2006-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1750997/ /pubmed/16941755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5001 Text en Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Malhotra, Atul
Patel, Sanjay
Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
title Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
title_full Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
title_fullStr Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
title_full_unstemmed Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
title_short Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
title_sort lung biopsy in ards: is it worth the risk?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16941755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5001
work_keys_str_mv AT malhotraatul lungbiopsyinardsisitworththerisk
AT patelsanjay lungbiopsyinardsisitworththerisk