Cargando…
Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk?
Progress in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been slow, perhaps in part due to the heterogeneity in the biology underlying this syndrome. Open lung biopsy is a feasible approach to define various subcategories of underlying histology. In experienced hands, with careful...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16941755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5001 |
_version_ | 1782131402724081664 |
---|---|
author | Malhotra, Atul Patel, Sanjay |
author_facet | Malhotra, Atul Patel, Sanjay |
author_sort | Malhotra, Atul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Progress in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been slow, perhaps in part due to the heterogeneity in the biology underlying this syndrome. Open lung biopsy is a feasible approach to define various subcategories of underlying histology. In experienced hands, with careful selection of patients and close attention to details of critical care management, including mechanical ventilator settings, the procedure is safe even in patients with severe disease. However, further work is needed to define which patients, if any, experience a beneficial effect on outcome from this procedure. More research is needed on assessing efficacy of potential therapies within histologically defined subgroups. In the future, various biomarkers may be available to non-invasively classify ARDS patients from the standpoint of responsiveness to various therapies, such as gluco-corticoids. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1750997 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17509972006-12-27 Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? Malhotra, Atul Patel, Sanjay Crit Care Commentary Progress in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been slow, perhaps in part due to the heterogeneity in the biology underlying this syndrome. Open lung biopsy is a feasible approach to define various subcategories of underlying histology. In experienced hands, with careful selection of patients and close attention to details of critical care management, including mechanical ventilator settings, the procedure is safe even in patients with severe disease. However, further work is needed to define which patients, if any, experience a beneficial effect on outcome from this procedure. More research is needed on assessing efficacy of potential therapies within histologically defined subgroups. In the future, various biomarkers may be available to non-invasively classify ARDS patients from the standpoint of responsiveness to various therapies, such as gluco-corticoids. BioMed Central 2006 2006-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1750997/ /pubmed/16941755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5001 Text en Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Malhotra, Atul Patel, Sanjay Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? |
title | Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? |
title_full | Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? |
title_fullStr | Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? |
title_full_unstemmed | Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? |
title_short | Lung biopsy in ARDS: is it worth the risk? |
title_sort | lung biopsy in ards: is it worth the risk? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750997/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16941755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malhotraatul lungbiopsyinardsisitworththerisk AT patelsanjay lungbiopsyinardsisitworththerisk |