Cargando…

The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a powerful tool that has been used extensively in the assessment and monitoring of cardiovascular physiology. Gross misinterpretation of data gathered by the PAC is common, and its routine use without any specific interventions has not been shown to influence o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Takala, Jukka
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1751012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16953899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5021
_version_ 1782131406296580096
author Takala, Jukka
author_facet Takala, Jukka
author_sort Takala, Jukka
collection PubMed
description The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a powerful tool that has been used extensively in the assessment and monitoring of cardiovascular physiology. Gross misinterpretation of data gathered by the PAC is common, and its routine use without any specific interventions has not been shown to influence outcome. However, there currently is no evidence from randomized, controlled trials that any diagnostic or monitoring tool used in intensive care patients improves outcome. Studies evaluating the use of the PAC have included numerous potential confounding factors, and should be interpreted with caution. The information obtained with the PAC should be used to find better treatment strategies, and these strategies, instead of the tool itself, should be tested in clinical trials.
format Text
id pubmed-1751012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17510122006-12-27 The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool Takala, Jukka Crit Care Commentary The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) is a powerful tool that has been used extensively in the assessment and monitoring of cardiovascular physiology. Gross misinterpretation of data gathered by the PAC is common, and its routine use without any specific interventions has not been shown to influence outcome. However, there currently is no evidence from randomized, controlled trials that any diagnostic or monitoring tool used in intensive care patients improves outcome. Studies evaluating the use of the PAC have included numerous potential confounding factors, and should be interpreted with caution. The information obtained with the PAC should be used to find better treatment strategies, and these strategies, instead of the tool itself, should be tested in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2006 2006-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1751012/ /pubmed/16953899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5021 Text en Copyright © 2006 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Takala, Jukka
The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
title The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
title_full The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
title_fullStr The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
title_full_unstemmed The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
title_short The pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
title_sort pulmonary artery catheter: the tool versus treatments based on the tool
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1751012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16953899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5021
work_keys_str_mv AT takalajukka thepulmonaryarterycatheterthetoolversustreatmentsbasedonthetool
AT takalajukka pulmonaryarterycatheterthetoolversustreatmentsbasedonthetool