Cargando…
A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
BACKGROUND: While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1761926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956033 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1 |
_version_ | 1782131512675663872 |
---|---|
author | Mazzi, Christian P Kidd, Michael |
author_facet | Mazzi, Christian P Kidd, Michael |
author_sort | Mazzi, Christian P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should they offer? OBJECTIVES: To examine the needs of the patient and the health care professional in an Internet-based diabetes management solution and how these needs are translated into services offered. METHODS: An evaluation framework was constructed based on a literature review that identified the requirements for an Internet-based diabetes management solution. The requirements were grouped into 5 categories: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. Two of the market leaders (myDiabetes and LifeMasters) were selected and were evaluated with the framework. The Web sites were evaluated independently by 5 raters using the evaluation framework. All evaluations were performed from November 1, 2001 through December 15, 2001. RESULTS: The agreement level between raters ranged from 60% to 100%. The multi-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.75 for myDiabetes and 0.65 for LifeMasters, indicating substantial agreement. The results of the evaluations indicate that LifeMasters is a more-complete solution than myDiabetes in all dimensions except Information, where both sites were equivalent. LifeMasters satisfied 32 evaluation criteria while myDiabetes satisfied 24 evaluation criteria, out of a possible 40 in the framework. CONCLUSIONS: The framework is based on the recognition that the management of diabetes via the Internet is based on several integrated dimensions: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. A successful diabetes management system should efficiently integrate all dimensions. The evaluation found that LifeMasters is successful in integrating the health care professional in the management of diabetes and that MyDiabetes is quite effective in providing a communication channel for community creation (however, communication with the health care professional is lacking). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1761926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-17619262007-01-03 A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management Mazzi, Christian P Kidd, Michael J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should they offer? OBJECTIVES: To examine the needs of the patient and the health care professional in an Internet-based diabetes management solution and how these needs are translated into services offered. METHODS: An evaluation framework was constructed based on a literature review that identified the requirements for an Internet-based diabetes management solution. The requirements were grouped into 5 categories: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. Two of the market leaders (myDiabetes and LifeMasters) were selected and were evaluated with the framework. The Web sites were evaluated independently by 5 raters using the evaluation framework. All evaluations were performed from November 1, 2001 through December 15, 2001. RESULTS: The agreement level between raters ranged from 60% to 100%. The multi-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.75 for myDiabetes and 0.65 for LifeMasters, indicating substantial agreement. The results of the evaluations indicate that LifeMasters is a more-complete solution than myDiabetes in all dimensions except Information, where both sites were equivalent. LifeMasters satisfied 32 evaluation criteria while myDiabetes satisfied 24 evaluation criteria, out of a possible 40 in the framework. CONCLUSIONS: The framework is based on the recognition that the management of diabetes via the Internet is based on several integrated dimensions: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. A successful diabetes management system should efficiently integrate all dimensions. The evaluation found that LifeMasters is successful in integrating the health care professional in the management of diabetes and that MyDiabetes is quite effective in providing a communication channel for community creation (however, communication with the health care professional is lacking). Gunther Eysenbach 2002-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1761926/ /pubmed/11956033 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1 Text en © Christian P Mazzi, Michael Kidd. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.1.2002. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Mazzi, Christian P Kidd, Michael A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management |
title | A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management |
title_full | A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management |
title_fullStr | A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management |
title_full_unstemmed | A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management |
title_short | A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management |
title_sort | framework for the evaluation of internet-based diabetes management |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1761926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956033 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzichristianp aframeworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement AT kiddmichael aframeworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement AT mazzichristianp frameworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement AT kiddmichael frameworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement |