Cargando…

A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management

BACKGROUND: While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzi, Christian P, Kidd, Michael
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1761926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956033
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1
_version_ 1782131512675663872
author Mazzi, Christian P
Kidd, Michael
author_facet Mazzi, Christian P
Kidd, Michael
author_sort Mazzi, Christian P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should they offer? OBJECTIVES: To examine the needs of the patient and the health care professional in an Internet-based diabetes management solution and how these needs are translated into services offered. METHODS: An evaluation framework was constructed based on a literature review that identified the requirements for an Internet-based diabetes management solution. The requirements were grouped into 5 categories: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. Two of the market leaders (myDiabetes and LifeMasters) were selected and were evaluated with the framework. The Web sites were evaluated independently by 5 raters using the evaluation framework. All evaluations were performed from November 1, 2001 through December 15, 2001. RESULTS: The agreement level between raters ranged from 60% to 100%. The multi-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.75 for myDiabetes and 0.65 for LifeMasters, indicating substantial agreement. The results of the evaluations indicate that LifeMasters is a more-complete solution than myDiabetes in all dimensions except Information, where both sites were equivalent. LifeMasters satisfied 32 evaluation criteria while myDiabetes satisfied 24 evaluation criteria, out of a possible 40 in the framework. CONCLUSIONS: The framework is based on the recognition that the management of diabetes via the Internet is based on several integrated dimensions: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. A successful diabetes management system should efficiently integrate all dimensions. The evaluation found that LifeMasters is successful in integrating the health care professional in the management of diabetes and that MyDiabetes is quite effective in providing a communication channel for community creation (however, communication with the health care professional is lacking).
format Text
id pubmed-1761926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17619262007-01-03 A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management Mazzi, Christian P Kidd, Michael J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: While still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should they offer? OBJECTIVES: To examine the needs of the patient and the health care professional in an Internet-based diabetes management solution and how these needs are translated into services offered. METHODS: An evaluation framework was constructed based on a literature review that identified the requirements for an Internet-based diabetes management solution. The requirements were grouped into 5 categories: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. Two of the market leaders (myDiabetes and LifeMasters) were selected and were evaluated with the framework. The Web sites were evaluated independently by 5 raters using the evaluation framework. All evaluations were performed from November 1, 2001 through December 15, 2001. RESULTS: The agreement level between raters ranged from 60% to 100%. The multi-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.75 for myDiabetes and 0.65 for LifeMasters, indicating substantial agreement. The results of the evaluations indicate that LifeMasters is a more-complete solution than myDiabetes in all dimensions except Information, where both sites were equivalent. LifeMasters satisfied 32 evaluation criteria while myDiabetes satisfied 24 evaluation criteria, out of a possible 40 in the framework. CONCLUSIONS: The framework is based on the recognition that the management of diabetes via the Internet is based on several integrated dimensions: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. A successful diabetes management system should efficiently integrate all dimensions. The evaluation found that LifeMasters is successful in integrating the health care professional in the management of diabetes and that MyDiabetes is quite effective in providing a communication channel for community creation (however, communication with the health care professional is lacking). Gunther Eysenbach 2002-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1761926/ /pubmed/11956033 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1 Text en © Christian P Mazzi, Michael Kidd. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 10.1.2002. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mazzi, Christian P
Kidd, Michael
A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
title A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
title_full A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
title_fullStr A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
title_full_unstemmed A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
title_short A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management
title_sort framework for the evaluation of internet-based diabetes management
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1761926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956033
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.1.e1
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzichristianp aframeworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement
AT kiddmichael aframeworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement
AT mazzichristianp frameworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement
AT kiddmichael frameworkfortheevaluationofinternetbaseddiabetesmanagement