Cargando…

Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review

Three main preventive principles against milk fever were evaluated in this literature review, and the efficacy of each principle was estimated from the results of controlled investigations. Oral calcium drenching around calving apparently has a mean efficacy of 50%–60% in terms of milk fever prevent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thilsing-Hansen, T, Jørgensen, RJ, Østergaard, S
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12071112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-1
_version_ 1782131600394289152
author Thilsing-Hansen, T
Jørgensen, RJ
Østergaard, S
author_facet Thilsing-Hansen, T
Jørgensen, RJ
Østergaard, S
author_sort Thilsing-Hansen, T
collection PubMed
description Three main preventive principles against milk fever were evaluated in this literature review, and the efficacy of each principle was estimated from the results of controlled investigations. Oral calcium drenching around calving apparently has a mean efficacy of 50%–60% in terms of milk fever prevention as well as prevention of milk fever relapse after intravenous treatment with calcium solutions. However, some drenches have been shown to cause lesions in the forestomacs. When using the DCAD (dietary cation-anion difference) principle, feeding rations with a negative DCAD (measured as (Na + K) – (Cl + S)) significantly reduce the milk fever incidence. Calculating the relative risk (RR) of developing milk fever from controlled experiments results in a mean RR between 0.19 and 0.35 when rations with a negative versus positive DCAD are compared. The main drawback from the DCAD principle is a palatability problem. The principle of feeding rations low in calcium is highly efficient in milk fever prevention provided the calcium intake in the dry period is kept below 20 g per day. Calculating the relative risk (RR) of developing milk fever from controlled experiments results in a very low mean RR (between 0 and 0.20) (daily calcium intake below versus above 20 g/d). The main problem in implementing the low-Ca principle is difficulties in formulating rations sufficiently low in calcium when using commonly available feeds. The use of large doses of vitamin D metabolites and analogues for milk fever prevention is controversial. Due to toxicity problems and an almost total lack of recent studies on the subject this principle is not described in detail. A few management related issues were discussed briefly, and the following conclusions were made: It is important to supply the periparturient cow with sufficient magnesium to fulfil its needs, and to prevent the dry cows from being too fat. Available information on the influence of carbohydrate intake, and on the effect of the length of the dry period and prepartum milking, is at present insufficient to include these factors in control programmes.
format Text
id pubmed-1764183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2002
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17641832007-01-06 Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review Thilsing-Hansen, T Jørgensen, RJ Østergaard, S Acta Vet Scand Original Article Three main preventive principles against milk fever were evaluated in this literature review, and the efficacy of each principle was estimated from the results of controlled investigations. Oral calcium drenching around calving apparently has a mean efficacy of 50%–60% in terms of milk fever prevention as well as prevention of milk fever relapse after intravenous treatment with calcium solutions. However, some drenches have been shown to cause lesions in the forestomacs. When using the DCAD (dietary cation-anion difference) principle, feeding rations with a negative DCAD (measured as (Na + K) – (Cl + S)) significantly reduce the milk fever incidence. Calculating the relative risk (RR) of developing milk fever from controlled experiments results in a mean RR between 0.19 and 0.35 when rations with a negative versus positive DCAD are compared. The main drawback from the DCAD principle is a palatability problem. The principle of feeding rations low in calcium is highly efficient in milk fever prevention provided the calcium intake in the dry period is kept below 20 g per day. Calculating the relative risk (RR) of developing milk fever from controlled experiments results in a very low mean RR (between 0 and 0.20) (daily calcium intake below versus above 20 g/d). The main problem in implementing the low-Ca principle is difficulties in formulating rations sufficiently low in calcium when using commonly available feeds. The use of large doses of vitamin D metabolites and analogues for milk fever prevention is controversial. Due to toxicity problems and an almost total lack of recent studies on the subject this principle is not described in detail. A few management related issues were discussed briefly, and the following conclusions were made: It is important to supply the periparturient cow with sufficient magnesium to fulfil its needs, and to prevent the dry cows from being too fat. Available information on the influence of carbohydrate intake, and on the effect of the length of the dry period and prepartum milking, is at present insufficient to include these factors in control programmes. BioMed Central 2002-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1764183/ /pubmed/12071112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-1 Text en
spellingShingle Original Article
Thilsing-Hansen, T
Jørgensen, RJ
Østergaard, S
Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review
title Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review
title_full Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review
title_fullStr Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review
title_short Milk Fever Control Principles: A Review
title_sort milk fever control principles: a review
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12071112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-1
work_keys_str_mv AT thilsinghansent milkfevercontrolprinciplesareview
AT jørgensenrj milkfevercontrolprinciplesareview
AT østergaards milkfevercontrolprinciplesareview