Cargando…

The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis

BACKGROUND: Most theories about cancer proposed during the last century share a common denominator: cancer is believed to be a biological nonsense for the organism in which it originates, since cancer cells are believed to be ones evading the rules that control normal cell proliferation and differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruggiero, Raúl A, Bustuoabad, Oscar D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-3-43
_version_ 1782131632260513792
author Ruggiero, Raúl A
Bustuoabad, Oscar D
author_facet Ruggiero, Raúl A
Bustuoabad, Oscar D
author_sort Ruggiero, Raúl A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most theories about cancer proposed during the last century share a common denominator: cancer is believed to be a biological nonsense for the organism in which it originates, since cancer cells are believed to be ones evading the rules that control normal cell proliferation and differentiation. In this essay, we have challenged this interpretation on the basis that, throughout the animal kingdom, cancer seems to arise only in injured organs and tissues that display lost or diminished regenerative ability. HYPOTHESIS: According to our hypothesis, a tumor cell would be the only one able to respond to the demand to proliferate in the organ of origin. It would be surrounded by "normal" aged cells that cannot respond to that signal. According to this interpretation, cancer would have a profound biological sense: it would be the ultimate way to attempt to restore organ functions and structures that have been lost or altered by aging or noxious environmental agents. In this way, the features commonly associated with tumor cells could be reinterpreted as progressively acquired adaptations for responding to a permanent regenerative signal in the context of tissue injury. Analogously, several embryo developmental stages could be dependent on cellular damage and death, which together disrupt the field topography. However, unlike normal structures, cancer would have no physiological value, because the usually poor or non-functional nature of its cells would make their reparative task unattainable. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis advanced in this essay might have significant practical implications. All conventional therapies against cancer attempt to kill all cancer cells. However, according to our hypothesis, the problem might not be solved even if all the tumor cells were eradicated. In effect, if the organ failure remained, new tumor cells would emerge and the tumor would reinitiate its progressive growth in response to the permanent regenerative signal of the non-restored organ. Therefore, efficient anti-cancer therapy should combine an attack against the tumor cells themselves with the correction of the organ failure, which, according to this hypothesis, is fundamental to the origin of the cancer.
format Text
id pubmed-1764731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-17647312007-01-09 The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis Ruggiero, Raúl A Bustuoabad, Oscar D Theor Biol Med Model Research BACKGROUND: Most theories about cancer proposed during the last century share a common denominator: cancer is believed to be a biological nonsense for the organism in which it originates, since cancer cells are believed to be ones evading the rules that control normal cell proliferation and differentiation. In this essay, we have challenged this interpretation on the basis that, throughout the animal kingdom, cancer seems to arise only in injured organs and tissues that display lost or diminished regenerative ability. HYPOTHESIS: According to our hypothesis, a tumor cell would be the only one able to respond to the demand to proliferate in the organ of origin. It would be surrounded by "normal" aged cells that cannot respond to that signal. According to this interpretation, cancer would have a profound biological sense: it would be the ultimate way to attempt to restore organ functions and structures that have been lost or altered by aging or noxious environmental agents. In this way, the features commonly associated with tumor cells could be reinterpreted as progressively acquired adaptations for responding to a permanent regenerative signal in the context of tissue injury. Analogously, several embryo developmental stages could be dependent on cellular damage and death, which together disrupt the field topography. However, unlike normal structures, cancer would have no physiological value, because the usually poor or non-functional nature of its cells would make their reparative task unattainable. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis advanced in this essay might have significant practical implications. All conventional therapies against cancer attempt to kill all cancer cells. However, according to our hypothesis, the problem might not be solved even if all the tumor cells were eradicated. In effect, if the organ failure remained, new tumor cells would emerge and the tumor would reinitiate its progressive growth in response to the permanent regenerative signal of the non-restored organ. Therefore, efficient anti-cancer therapy should combine an attack against the tumor cells themselves with the correction of the organ failure, which, according to this hypothesis, is fundamental to the origin of the cancer. BioMed Central 2006-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1764731/ /pubmed/17173673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-3-43 Text en Copyright © 2006 Ruggiero and Bustuoabad; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ruggiero, Raúl A
Bustuoabad, Oscar D
The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
title The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
title_full The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
title_fullStr The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
title_short The biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
title_sort biological sense of cancer: a hypothesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1764731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17173673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-3-43
work_keys_str_mv AT ruggieroraula thebiologicalsenseofcancerahypothesis
AT bustuoabadoscard thebiologicalsenseofcancerahypothesis
AT ruggieroraula biologicalsenseofcancerahypothesis
AT bustuoabadoscard biologicalsenseofcancerahypothesis